James E. Pfander has focused his teaching and research on the role of the federal judiciary under Article III of the Constitution. His latest book, Constitutional Torts and the War on Terror (Oxford U. Press 2017), documents and evaluates the failure of the federal courts to address the merits of the claims of individuals who were subjected to extraordinary rendition, military detention, and torture during the Bush Administration’s war on terror. Other books include Civil Procedure: A Modern Approach (7th ed. 2018) (with Marcus, Redish & Sherman); Federal Courts: Cases, Comments, and Questions (8th ed. 2018) (with Redish & Sherry), Principles of Federal Jurisdiction (3d ed. 2017).
Pfander’s recent scholarship explores the role of non-contentious jurisdiction in a federal system otherwise largely devoted to the resolution of disputes between adverse parties; the forgotten distinction between “cases” and “controversies” in defining the work of the federal judiciary; the lessons available from Scotland’s civil-law-inflected approach to the problem of litigant standing; the origins and meaning of the anti-injunction act of 1793; and the possible influence of the Scottish judicial system on the structure of the federal court system.
A member of the American Law Institute, Pfander recently concluded his work as reporter/consultant to the Federal-State Jurisdiction Committee of the Judicial Conference of the United States. He has served as chair of both the federal courts and civil procedure sections of the Association of American Law Schools.
*****
A person listed as a contributor has spoken or otherwise participated in Federalist Society events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on this list does not imply any other endorsement or relationship between the person and the Federalist Society. In most cases, the biographical information on a person's "contributor" page is provided directly by the person, and the Federalist Society does not edit or otherwise endorse that information. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues. All expressions of opinion by a contributor are those of the contributor.
When, if Ever, are Nationwide Injunctions Appropriate?
Northwestern Student Chapter
Northwestern Pritzker School of Law375 E. Chicago Ave.
Chicago, IL 60611
Civil Juries: A Vital Right or an Unhealthy Romance?
Northwestern Student Chapter
Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law375 E Chicago Ave
Chicago, IL 60611
Is It Time to End Life Tenure for Federal Judges?
2019 National Lawyers Convention
The Mayflower Hotel1127 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
2019 National Lawyers Convention
Originalism
The Mayflower Hotel1127 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
The Constitutional Power of Lower Court Judges to Disregard Precedent
Northwestern Student Chapter
Northwestern Law.
Chicago, IL 60611
Is It Time to End Life Tenure for Federal Judges?
2019 National Lawyers Convention
On November 14, 2019, the Federalist Society's Litigation Practice Group hosted a panel for the...
Is It Time to End Life Tenure for Federal Judges?
2019 National Lawyers Convention
On November 14, 2019, the Federalist Society's Litigation Practice Group hosted a panel for the...
A Distinct Judicial Power - Faculty Book Podcast
Faculty Division Podcast 05-22-12 featuring Scott Gerber and Jim Pfander
This Federalist Society Faculty Book Podcast features Professor Scott Gerber’s new book, A Distinct Judicial...