Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public policy matters. Any expressions of opinion are those of the author. We welcome responses to the views presented here. To join the debate, please email us at [email protected].
Topics
Navigating a TCPA Minefield: Understanding the “Quiet Hours” Rule
Regulations should be clear and predictable. Businesses should be able to operate with a reasonable...
Remembering Manny Klausner
In my early days at the Federalist Society, I sent letters to a few people...
Topics
ABA Responds to AG Bondi on Standard 206
As noted in a previous post, on February 22, the Council of the ABA Section of...
Topics
Will Gail Slater Bring Fairness Back to the Antitrust Division?
“Ensure the law is enforced both vigorously and fairly, with clear rules.” That’s how Gail...
Topics
Education Department Dear Colleague Letter Implements Trump Administration Anti-Discrimination Policies in Education
Time’s up. Schools throughout the country were fighting the calendar after a recent Dear Colleague...
Topics
Article III and the Canal Zone District Court: What Does the Constitution Require of Territorial Courts?
With President Donald Trump’s pledge to take back the Panama Canal, it’s worth looking back...
Topics
Supreme Court Agrees to Take Case Challenging State Law Restricting Counselor’s Speech
On March 10, the Supreme Court granted review in a case likely to become the...
Topics
How FCC v. Consumers’ Research Could Sink Proposals to Reform Labor Law
On its face, FCC v. Consumers’ Research seems to have nothing to do with labor...
Topics
Should Lower Courts Continue to Apply Employment Division v. Smith?
The Supreme Court in 1990 in Employment Division v. Smith held that a rational regulation...
Topics
Two Supreme Court Justices Challenge “Confusing” McDonnell Douglas Employment Discrimination Framework
On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari in Hittle v. City of Stockton, California,...