Professor Candeub joined the MSU Law faculty in fall 2004. He is also a Fellow with MSU's Institute of Public Utilities. Prior to joining MSU, he served as an advisor at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). From 1998 to 2000, Professor Candeub was a litigation associate for the Washington D.C. firm of Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue and also has served as a corporate associate with Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton, also in Washington, D.C. Immediately following law school, he clerked for Chief Judge J. Clifford Wallace, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. While in law school, Professor Candeub was an articles editor for the University of Pennsylvania Law Review.
Professor Candeub's scholarly interests focus on the law and regulation of communications, internet, technology. His numerous law review articles and scholarly papers have placed him at the center of legal and policy controversies, and he often writes for popular outlets such as the Wall Street Journal and US News. Federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, have cited and relied upon his work.
He joined the Trump administration in 2019 as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Telecommunications and Information and assumed the role of Acting Assistant Secretary. He later joined the Department of Justice as Deputy Associate Attorney General.
Professor Candeub is a senior fellow at the D.C.-based Center of Renewing America.
*****
A person listed as a contributor has spoken or otherwise participated in Federalist Society events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on this list does not imply any other endorsement or relationship between the person and the Federalist Society. In most cases, the biographical information on a person's "contributor" page is provided directly by the person, and the Federalist Society does not edit or otherwise endorse that information. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues. All expressions of opinion by a contributor are those of the contributor.
Panel 3: Corporate Speech and the First Amendment
State Power Review Conference
The Mayflower Hotel1127 Connecticut Ave NW
Washington, DC 20036
Red Flag Laws: The Good, The Bad, and The Patently Unconstitutional
Michigan State Student Chapter
Michigan State University College of Law648 E. Shaw Lane
East Lansing, MI 48824
State Regulation of Social Media
Suffolk Student Chapter
Suffolk Law School120 Tremont Street
Boston, MA 02108
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Murthy v. Missouri
Murthy v. Missouri, originally filed as Missouri v. Biden, concerns whether federal government officials had...
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Murthy v. Missouri
Murthy v. Missouri, originally filed as Missouri v. Biden, concerns whether federal government officials had...
Two Conservative Visions of the First Amendment: Social Media Anti-Discrimination Law at the Supreme Court
Last month, the Supreme Court granted certiorari to review the Fifth Circuit’s decision upholding Texas’s...
Age Verification for Social Media: A Constitutional and Reasonable Regulation
In March, the Utah Social Media Regulation Act, S.B. 152, became law. It adopts almost...
Panel 3: Corporate Speech and the First Amendment
State Power Review Conference
How does the First Amendment apply to corporations? Do First Amendment interests and protections apply...