University Professor Nelson Lund is the author of Rousseau’s Rejuvenation of Political Philosophy: A New Introduction. He has also written widely in the field of constitutional law, including articles on constitutional interpretation, federalism, separation of powers, the Second Amendment, the Commerce Clause, the Speech or Debate Clause, the Equal Protection Clause, and the Uniformity Clause. In addition, he has published articles in the fields of employment discrimination and civil rights, the legal regulation of medical ethics, and the application of economic analysis to legal institutions and legal ethics.
Professor Lund graduated from St. John's College in Annapolis, Maryland, after which he received an MA in philosophy from the Catholic University of America and a PhD in political science from Harvard University. He left the faculty of the University of Chicago to attend its law school, where he served as executive editor of the University of Chicago Law Review and chapter chairman of the Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies. After law school, he held positions at the United States Department of Justice in the Office of the Solicitor General and the Office of Legal Counsel. He also served as a law clerk to the Honorable Patrick E. Higginbotham of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and to the Honorable Sandra Day O'Connor of the United States Supreme Court. Following his clerkship with Justice O'Connor, Professor Lund served in the White House as associate counsel to the president from 1989 to 1992.
Since joining the faculty at George Mason University's Antonin Scalia Law School, Professor Lund has taught Constitutional Law, Legislation, Federal Election Law, Employment Discrimination, State and Local Government, and seminars on the Second Amendment and on a variety of topics in Jurisprudence.
*****
A person listed as a contributor has spoken or otherwise participated in Federalist Society events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on this list does not imply any other endorsement or relationship between the person and the Federalist Society. In most cases, the biographical information on a person's "contributor" page is provided directly by the person, and the Federalist Society does not edit or otherwise endorse that information. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues. All expressions of opinion by a contributor are those of the contributor.
The Second Amendment and SCOTUS: A Debate Over Text & History
Columbus Lawyers Chapter
The Athletic Club of Columbus - Crystal Room, 2nd Floor136 East Broad Street
Columbus, OH 43215
Bruen and the Future Of 2nd Amendment Rights
George Mason Student Chapter
Scalia Law School3301 Fairfax Dr
Arlington, VA 22206
McCulloch v. Maryland: A Debate
George Mason Student Chapter
Antonin Scalia Law School3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen
Will the Supreme Court Recognize a Right to Bear Arms in Public?
TeleforumA Specious Form of Judicial Restraint
When eight members of our disputatious Supreme Court join an opinion on a controversial topic...
Remembering Justice Sandra Day O'Connor
Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, for whom I was a law clerk in 1987-1988, was the...
The Second Amendment, From Bruen to Rahimi
On November 7, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in United States v....
A Response to Stephen Halbrook’s Response on Bruen
Stephen P. Halbrook is a giant in the field of Second Amendment studies, and I...
Bruen’s Preliminary Preservation of the Second Amendment
Federalist Society Review, Volume 23
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right...