Facts of the Case
This case was the consolidation of cases arising in Kansas, South Carolina, Virginia, Delaware, and Washington D.C. relating to the segregation of public schools on the basis of race. In each of the cases, African American students had been denied admittance to certain public schools based on laws allowing public education to be segregated by race. They argued that such segregation violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The plaintiffs were denied relief in the lower courts based on Plessy v. Ferguson, which held that racially segregated public facilities were legal so long as the facilities for blacks and whites were equal. (This was known as the “separate but equal” doctrine.)
Questions
Does the segregation of public education based solely on race violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?
Conclusions
-
Separate but equal educational facilities for racial minorities is inherently unequal, violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Chief Justice Earl Warren delivered the opinion of the unanimous Court. The Supreme Court held that “separate but equal” facilities are inherently unequal and violate the protections of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court reasoned that the segregation of public education based on race instilled a sense of inferiority that had a hugely detrimental effect on the education and personal growth of African American children. Warren based much of his opinion on information from social science studies rather than court precedent. The decision also used language that was relatively accessible to non-lawyers because Warren felt it was necessary for all Americans to understand its logic.
Supreme Court to Hear Two Challenges to President Biden’s Student Loan Forgiveness Program
In December, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in two cases challenging the student loan forgiveness...
What Adam Liptak Doesn’t Know about Brown v. Board and Originalism
Adam Liptak, the New York Times’ Supreme Court reporter, recently published an article in which...
Principles of State Constitutional Interpretation
Federalist Society Review, Volume 23
State constitutionalism—the practice of state courts deciding cases on independent state constitutional grounds—is a vital...
Should the “Hollow Core” of Constitutional Theory Be Filled with the Framers’ Intentions?
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
A Review of The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers, by...
Learning to Change: New Takes on Education Reform
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
A Review of: The Choice We Face: How Segregation, Race, and Power Have Shaped America’s...
Should the Supreme Court Take Note of “Th’ Iliction Returns” Next Time It Addresses Race-Preferential Admissions Policies?
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
“[N]o matter whether th’ constitution follows th’ flag or not, th’ Supreme Court follows th’...
Hamlet Without the Prince
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
A review of The Second Founding: An Introduction to the Fourteenth Amendment, by Ilan Wurman...
Affirmative Action Confusion at the College of Charleston
Fast Action! On July 29, 2018, the Charleston Post and Courier ran a story entitled Affirmative...
Liberty Month Revisited: The Separation of Powers, Stare Decisis, and the Constitution
This month we are sharing a selection of paired pieces from The Federalist Society's Liberty...
Supremacy and the Supreme Court
Since Marbury v. Madison in 1803, it’s been “settled law” that the Supreme Court is...
Bar Watch Bulletin for August 9, 2011
House of Delegates, ABA President-Elect
Reporting live from the ABA Meetings in Toronto. House of Delegates Recommendation 10B, proposed by...
Clint Bolick Reviews # Educational Freedom in Urban America: Brown v. Board After Half a Century by David Salisbury and Casey Lartigue Jr.
Last year our nation celebrated the 50th anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education—and lamented...
Sordid Business: The Supreme Court Confronts the Constitutionality of Racial Preferences in K-12 Education
It is a sordid business, this divvying us up by race.—Chief Justice Roberts The...
School Desegregation In 1999
Civil Rights Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 2, Issue 3, Winter 1998
Reproduced below is a recent letter that Linda Chavez, president of the Center for Equal...
The Conservative Case for an Activist Judiciary
Goodwin Hotel One Haynes StreetHartford,
2004 National Lawyers Convention
Celebrating Brown v. Board of Education's Promise of Equality: How Well Are We Doing Fifty Years Later?
The Mayflower Hotel1127 Connecticut Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20036