Brown v. Board of Education | The Federalist Society

Facts of the Case

Provided by Oyez

This case was the consolidation of cases arising in Kansas, South Carolina, Virginia, Delaware, and Washington D.C. relating to the segregation of public schools on the basis of race. In each of the cases, African American students had been denied admittance to certain public schools based on laws allowing public education to be segregated by race. They argued that such segregation violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The plaintiffs were denied relief in the lower courts based on Plessy v. Ferguson, which held that racially segregated public facilities were legal so long as the facilities for blacks and whites were equal. (This was known as the “separate but equal” doctrine.)

Questions

Does the segregation of public education based solely on race violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?

Conclusions

Separate but equal educational facilities for racial minorities is inherently unequal, violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Chief Justice Earl Warren delivered the opinion of the unanimous Court. The Supreme Court held that “separate but equal” facilities are inherently unequal and violate the protections of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court reasoned that the segregation of public education based on race instilled a sense of inferiority that had a hugely detrimental effect on the education and personal growth of African American children. Warren based much of his opinion on information from social science studies rather than court precedent. The decision also used language that was relatively accessible to non-lawyers because Warren felt it was necessary for all Americans to understand its logic.

Apr 10 2024

Racial Preferences in Economic Benefits: From Widely Accepted to Legally Indefensible

George R. La Noue

Federalist Society Review, Volume 25

As the United States began to emerge from its long history of legal segregation and...

Dec 20 2023

A Deeper Originalism: From Court-Centered Jurisprudence to Constitutional Self-Government

Johnathan O'Neill

Federalist Society Review, Volume 24

Originalism has substantially reoriented constitutional discourse since it first reemerged in response to the Warren...

Aug 23 2023

What Is Conservative Constitutionalism? A Fractured History Reveals an Uncertain Path Forward

Bradley C. S. Watson

Federalist Society Review, Volume 24

A review of Johnathan O’Neill, Conservative Thought and American Constitutionalism Since the New Deal (Johns Hopkins...

Apr 18 2023

Dept. of Ed. v. Brown & Biden v. Nebraska - Post-Argument SCOTUScast

Mark Chenoweth

On February 28, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in two cases challenging the...

Feb 28 2023

Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Dept. of Ed. v. Brown & Biden v. Nebraska

Mark Chenoweth

February 28, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral argument in two cases challenging...

Feb 28 2023

Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Dept. of Ed. v. Brown & Biden v. Nebraska

Mark Chenoweth

February 28, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral argument in two cases challenging...

Feb 1 2023

The Chief Justice at His Best and Worst

GianCarlo Canaparo

Sometimes Chief Justice John Roberts writes beautifully. When he does, his writing is understated; he...

Jan 18 2023

Supreme Court to Hear Two Challenges to President Biden’s Student Loan Forgiveness Program

Karen Harned

In December, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in two cases challenging the student loan forgiveness...

Aug 4 2022

What Adam Liptak Doesn’t Know about Brown v. Board and Originalism

GianCarlo Canaparo, Jack Fitzhenry

Adam Liptak, the New York Times’ Supreme Court reporter, recently published an article in which...

Aug 4 2022

What Adam Liptak Doesn’t Know about Brown v. Board and Originalism

GianCarlo Canaparo, Jack Fitzhenry

Adam Liptak, the New York Times’ Supreme Court reporter, recently published an article in which...

Mar 24 2022

Principles of State Constitutional Interpretation

Clint Bolick

Federalist Society Review, Volume 23

State constitutionalism—the practice of state courts deciding cases on independent state constitutional grounds—is a vital...

Mar 24 2022

Principles of State Constitutional Interpretation

Clint Bolick

Federalist Society Review, Volume 23

State constitutionalism—the practice of state courts deciding cases on independent state constitutional grounds—is a vital...

Aug 20 2021