The Federalist Society

Optional Login

Have an account?

Sign in

Email

Password


Forgot password?

Proceed as Guest

Continue

Dred Scott v. Sandford

Facts of the Case

Provided by Oyez

Dred Scott was a slave in Missouri. From 1833 to 1843, he resided in Illinois (a free state) and in the Louisiana Territory, where slavery was forbidden by the Missouri Compromise of 1820. After returning to Missouri, Scott filed suit in Missouri court for his freedom, claiming that his residence in free territory made him a free man. After losing, Scott brought a new suit in federal court. Scott's master maintained that no “negro” or descendant of slaves could be a citizen in the sense of Article III of the Constitution.

Questions

  1. Was Dred Scott free or a slave?

Conclusions

  1. The majority held that “a negro, whose ancestors were imported into [the U.S.], and sold as slaves,” whether enslaved or free, could not be an American citizen and therefore did not have standing to sue in federal court. Because the Court lacked jurisdiction, Taney dismissed the case on procedural grounds.

    Taney further held that the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was unconstitutional and foreclose Congress from freeing slaves within Federal territories. The opinion showed deference to the Missouri courts, which held that moving to a free state did not render Scott emancipated. Finally, Taney ruled that slaves were property under the Fifth Amendment, and that any law that would deprive a slave owner of that property was unconstitutional. 

    In dissent, Benjamin Robbins Curtis criticized Taney for addressing the claim’s substance after finding the Court lacked jurisdiction. He pointed out that invalidating the Missouri Compromise was not necessary to resolve the case, and cast doubt on Taney’s position that the Founders categorically opposed anti-slavery laws. 

    John McLean echoed Curtis, finding the majority improperly reviewed the claim’s substance when its holding should have been limited to procedure. He also argued that men of African descent could be citizens because they already had the right to vote in five states.

Justice Alito Reviews "The Constitution: An Introduction" by Michael Stokes Paulsen & Luke Paulsen
Federalist Society Review

Justice Alito Reviews "The Constitution: An Introduction" by Michael Stokes Paulsen & Luke Paulsen

Samuel A. Alito

Engage Volume 16, Issue 1

The Constitution: An Introduction by Michael Stokes Paulsen & Luke Paulsen   Reviewed by Justice Samuel...

Justice Alito Reviews "The Constitution: An Introduction" by Michael Stokes Paulsen & Luke Paulsen
Federalist Society Review

Justice Alito Reviews "The Constitution: An Introduction" by Michael Stokes Paulsen & Luke Paulsen

Samuel A. Alito

Engage Volume 16, Issue 1

The Constitution: An Introduction by Michael Stokes Paulsen & Luke Paulsen   Reviewed by Justice Samuel...

View more