Prof. Emily Bremer

Associate Professor of Law, University of Notre Dame Law School

Emily Bremer teaches and writes in the areas of administrative law, civil procedure, and business associations. Her scholarship focuses primarily on matters of procedural design and issues that arise at the intersection of public law and private ordering, with a particular focus on the use of privately developed technical standards in governmental regulation. Bremer serves as a Public Member of the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS), a small, free standing federal agency charged with improving government processes, procedures, and performance, and as a Council Member of the American Bar Association’s Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice. She is a regular contributor to the Yale Journal on Regulation’s Notice & Comment blog.

Bremer earned her B.A. in Politics, magna cum laude, from New York University and her J.D. from New York University School of Law, where she was was the Executive Notes Editor of the NYU Journal of Law & Liberty and a student editor for the International Journal of Constitutional Law. After law school, she clerked for Hon. Andrew J. Kleinfeld on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. She also practiced law as an associate in the telecommunications and appellate litigation group of Wiley Rein LLP in Washington, DC and served as the Research Chief of ACUS (after first joining the agency as an Attorney Advisor).


A person listed as a contributor has spoken or otherwise participated in Federalist Society events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on this list does not imply any other endorsement or relationship between the person and the Federalist Society. In most cases, the biographical information on a person's "contributor" page is provided directly by the person, and the Federalist Society does not edit or otherwise endorse that information. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues. All expressions of opinion by a contributor are those of the contributor.