Facts of the Case
In 1970, Jane Roe (a fictional name used in court documents to protect the plaintiff’s identity) filed a lawsuit against Henry Wade, the district attorney of Dallas County, Texas, where she resided, challenging a Texas law making abortion illegal except by a doctor’s orders to save a woman’s life. In her lawsuit, Roe alleged that the state laws were unconstitutionally vague and abridged her right of personal privacy, protected by the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments.
Questions
Does the Constitution recognize a woman's right to terminate her pregnancy by abortion?
Conclusions
-
Inherent in the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is a fundamental “right to privacy” that protects a pregnant woman’s choice whether to have an abortion. However, this right is balanced against the government’s interests in protecting women's health and protecting “the potentiality of human life.” The Texas law challenged in this case violated this right.
Justice Harry Blackmun delivered the opinion for the 7-2 majority of the Court.
First, the Court considered whether the case was moot, concluding that it was not. When the subject of litigation is “capable of repetition yet evading review,” a case need not be dismissed as moot. Pregnancy is a “classic justification for a conclusion of nonmootness.”
The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protects against state action the right to privacy, and a woman’s right to choose to have an abortion falls within that right to privacy. A state law that broadly prohibits abortion without respect to the stage of pregnancy or other interests violates that right. Although the state has legitimate interests in protecting the health of pregnant women and the “potentiality of human life,” the relative weight of each of these interests varies over the course of pregnancy, and the law must account for this variability.
In the first trimester of pregnancy, the state may not regulate the abortion decision; only the pregnant woman and her attending physician can make that decision. In the second trimester, the state may impose regulations on abortion that are reasonably related to maternal health. In the third trimester, once the fetus reaches the point of “viability,” a state may regulate abortions or prohibit them entirely, so long as the laws contain exceptions for cases when abortion is necessary to save the life or health of the mother.
Bad Judicial Medicine
This post originally appeared in American Reformer. President Biden and Senator Majority Leader Chuck Schumer recently announced...
Declaring Independence to Secure Integrity: The Supreme Court Justices' Code of Conduct
Federalist Society Review, Volume 25
[T]he judiciary is beyond comparison the weakest of the three departments of power; that it...
A Response to the Constitution's Critics
Federalist Society Review, Volume 25
A review of Dennis Hale and Marc Landy, Keeping the Republic: A Defense of American...
.jpg)
Litigation Update: Arizona Supreme Court Opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Mayes / Hazelrigg
Throughout Arizona’s history as a state, the criminal code authorized penalties against any person who...
Litigation Update: Arizona Supreme Court Opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Mayes / Hazelrigg
Throughout Arizona’s history as a state, the criminal code authorized penalties against any person who...
The Supreme Court of Texas Addresses Exception to State Anti-Abortion Law
In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 reversal of Roe v. Wade,[1] the...
Georgia Supreme Court Rules that State’s Heartbeat Law Is Not Void Ab Initio
In Georgia v. SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective,[1] the Georgia Supreme Court ruled that...
Supreme Court to Decide Whether EMTALA Preempts State Abortion Laws: Idaho v. U.S. and Moyle v. U.S.
Abortion is before the Supreme Court once again. This month, the Court granted certiorari in...
Groff v. DeJoy: The Death of the “De Minimis” Test Breathes Life Back into Religious Accommodation
Federalist Society Review, Volume 24
In a unanimous decision last June, the Supreme Court in Groff v. DeJoy heightened the...
Iowa Supreme Court Leaves in Place Injunction of Fetal Heartbeat Law, New One Passed Weeks Later
In Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, Inc. v. Reynolds (Planned Parenthood IV), the Supreme Court...
A Federal Gestational Age Abortion Ban is the Wrong (and Unconstitutional) Hill for the Pro-Life Movement to Die On
In Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, decided in June 2022, the Supreme Court overruled...
A Federal Gestational Age Abortion Ban is the Wrong (and Unconstitutional) Hill for the Pro-Life Movement to Die On
In Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, decided in June 2022, the Supreme Court overruled...
Tyler v. Hennepin County: Why This Seemingly Innocent Decision is Disquieting
A Supreme Court ruling, like many other things, may not be quite what it seems....
Abortion Laws In Oklahoma Subject of Fractured Decision at State Supreme Court
Immediately after the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization,[1]...
Supreme Court of Texas Says Calling Abortion Murder Is Protected Speech, Not Defamation
In Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity v. Dickson, the Supreme Court of Texas held that...
North Dakota Supreme Court Concludes State Constitution Protects the Right to Abortions to Preserve Life or Health
In Wrigley v. Romanick,[1] the North Dakota Supreme Court addressed a trigger law that criminalized...
Originalism Carries On
Federalist Society Review, Volume 24
A review of Erwin Chemerinsky, A Momentous Year in the Supreme Court: October Term 2021...
Special Session I: Dobbs, Roe, Casey, and the Rule of Law
2022 National Lawyers Convention
On June 24, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court released a 6-3 decision in Dobbs v....
Special Session I: Dobbs, Roe, Casey, and the Rule of Law
2022 National Lawyers Convention
On June 24, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court released a 6-3 decision in Dobbs v....
Rights to Privacy and Life Were Compatible until Roe
Half a century ago, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a federal constitutional right...
Rights to Privacy and Life Were Compatible until Roe
Half a century ago, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a federal constitutional right...
Department of Veterans Affairs Interim Final Rule on Abortion
Since the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization overturning Roe v....
Rights Talk in a Post-Liberal Age: Mary Ann Glendon's Enduring Insight Into the American Rights Tradition
Federalist Society Review, Volume 23
Gross human rights violations occur every day, often invisibly to most of us. Media coverage...
A Discussion on Dobbs
Please join the Federalist Society's Practice Groups for a virtual event on Dobbs v. Jackson...
A Discussion on Dobbs
Please join the Federalist Society's Practice Groups for a virtual event on Dobbs v. Jackson...
An Emergency of Abortion Misinformation
The moment the U.S. Supreme Court decided Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization and held...
The Biden Administration’s Post-Dobbs, Post-Roe Response
On June 24, 2022, in a landmark decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization,...
Are We Still One People? Do We Hold These Truths?
Much has been written, published and broadcast about a Divided America—especially now, with the Dobbs...
Are We Still One People? Do We Hold These Truths?
Much has been written, published and broadcast about a Divided America—especially now, with the Dobbs...
Courthouse Steps Decision Webinar: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
On June 24, 2022, the US Supreme Court decided Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. In...
Courthouse Steps Decision Webinar: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
On June 24, 2022, the US Supreme Court decided Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. In...
Dobbs: Looking Back, Looking Forward
Dobbs was a major decision and has created much discussion. The Federalist Society has covered...
Religious Liberty Update on Congressional and Executive Branch Actions
Congress 1. In the wake of the unprecedented leak of the draft Dobbs decision on...
How Would Burke Decide Dobbs?
Edmund Burke is getting a revival these days in the Supreme Court. The Chief cited...
How Would Burke Decide Dobbs?
Edmund Burke is getting a revival these days in the Supreme Court. The Chief cited...
Bargaining Rights Gone Wrong: How State Courts Invented a Constitutional Duty to Bargain and How It Harms Individual Workers
Federalist Society Review, Volume 23
Constitutions often give you the right to do things. They give you the right to...
Against Living Common Goodism
Federalist Society Review, Volume 23
Today I want to discuss a new version of an old debate. In 1985, then-Attorney...
Principles of State Constitutional Interpretation
Federalist Society Review, Volume 23
State constitutionalism—the practice of state courts deciding cases on independent state constitutional grounds—is a vital...
Legal Review: Dobbs and the Holdings of Roe and Casey
Before the Supreme Court this term is the question of whether all pre-viability bans on...
James Madison And The Fight For The Constitution
A FedSoc Films Production
Discover the story of James Madison, the Founding Father who gave us the Constitution and...
James Madison And The Fight For The Constitution
A FedSoc Films Production
Discover the story of James Madison, the Founding Father who gave us the Constitution and...
The Religious Question and Abortion
Yesterday the Supreme Court heard argument in Dobbs et al., v. Jackson Women’s Health, a...
Dyer and Cooper Take on Mississippi's Historical Case
As many readers have probably noticed, tomorrow is a signal moment in our nation. The...
Dyer and Cooper Take on Mississippi's Historical Case
As many readers have probably noticed, tomorrow is a signal moment in our nation. The...
In Dobbs v. Jackson, History is On Mississippi's Side
This post originally appeared at Newsweek and is being republished here with permission. The Supreme...
In Dobbs v. Jackson, History is On Mississippi's Side
This post originally appeared at Newsweek and is being republished here with permission. The Supreme...
Courthouse Steps Pre-Argument Webinar: Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
A Federalist Society Webinar
On December 1, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization,...
Courthouse Steps Pre-Argument Webinar: Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
A Federalist Society Webinar
On December 1, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization,...
The Gordian Knot of Abortion Jurisprudence
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
On December 1, the Supreme Court will hear argument in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health...
The Gordian Knot of Abortion Jurisprudence
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
On December 1, the Supreme Court will hear argument in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health...
Should the “Hollow Core” of Constitutional Theory Be Filled with the Framers’ Intentions?
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
A Review of The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers, by...
The Equal Rights Amendment, Then and Now – Part II
Recap In 1920, the U.S. Constitution was amended to extend to women the right to...
How the Founders’ Natural Law Theory Illuminates the Original Meaning of Free Exercise
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
In Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, the Supreme Court will consider whether Philadelphia’s 2018 policy...
![Click to play: Roe v. Wade: A Legal History [Full Documentary]](https://img.youtube.com/vi/cRAlc0NrlNQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Roe v. Wade: A Legal History [Full Documentary]
Documentary by FedSoc Films and Coronation Media
As one of the most consequential decisions in the history of the Supreme Court, Roe...
Roe v. Wade: A Legal History [Full Documentary]
Documentary by FedSoc Films and Coronation Media
As one of the most consequential decisions in the history of the Supreme Court, Roe...
Book Review: The Law of Law School, by Andrew Guthrie Ferguson and Jonathan Yusef Newton
Mentoring law students and advising people considering law school about the pros and cons of...
A Circuit Split Emerges on Post-June Medical Abortion Standards
The Federalist Society is pleased to announce its Student Blog Initiative, a project of the...
A Circuit Split Emerges on Post-June Medical Abortion Standards
The Federalist Society is pleased to announce its Student Blog Initiative, a project of the...
Unleashed and Unbound: Living Textualism in Bostock v. Clayton County
Federalist Society Review, Volume 21
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
![Click to play: Roe v. Wade: Abortion in New York [Short Film]](https://img.youtube.com/vi/iaPg9yCGgRs/mqdefault.jpg)
Roe v. Wade: Abortion in New York [Short Film]
Documentary short from Coronation Media and FedSoc Films
As one of the first states to repeal its abortion statute before Roe v. Wade legalized...
Roe v. Wade: Abortion in New York [Short Film]
Documentary short from Coronation Media and FedSoc Films
As one of the first states to repeal its abortion statute before Roe v. Wade legalized...
NY v. HHS and the Challenge of Protecting Conscience Rights in Healthcare
Federalist Society Review, Volume 21
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
![Click to play: Roe v. Wade: The Power of a Law Review [Short Film]](https://img.youtube.com/vi/tIe-Rj_2yB8/mqdefault.jpg)
Roe v. Wade: The Power of a Law Review [Short Film]
Documentary short from Coronation Media and FedSoc Films
How did a law review article impact one of the most famous cases in Supreme...
Roe v. Wade: The Power of a Law Review [Short Film]
Documentary short from Coronation Media and FedSoc Films
How did a law review article impact one of the most famous cases in Supreme...
Roe v. Wade: A Legal History | Part Three: The Decision
Documentary short from Coronation Media and FedSoc Films
The majority opinion written by Justice Blackmun in Roe v. Wade declared that abortion was a...
Roe v. Wade: A Legal History | Part Three: The Decision
Documentary short from Coronation Media and FedSoc Films
The majority opinion written by Justice Blackmun in Roe v. Wade declared that abortion was a...
The Supreme Court Takes Up Abortion: What You Need to Know About June Medical Services v. Gee
Federalist Society Review, Volume 20
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
The Supreme Court Takes Up Abortion: What You Need to Know About June Medical Services v. Gee
Federalist Society Review, Volume 20
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
The Future of the Federal Judiciary
Federalist Society Review, Volume 20
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
Roe v. Wade: A Legal History | Part Two: The Right to Privacy
Documentary short from Coronation Media and FedSoc Films
Though it is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, the concept of a fundamental right...
Roe v. Wade: A Legal History | Part Two: The Right to Privacy
Documentary short from Coronation Media and FedSoc Films
Though it is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, the concept of a fundamental right...
Roe v. Wade: A Legal History | Part One: To the Court
Documentary short from Coronation Media and FedSoc Films
As one of the most consequential decisions in the history of the Supreme Court, Roe...
Roe v. Wade: A Legal History | Part One: To the Court
Documentary short from Coronation Media and FedSoc Films
As one of the most consequential decisions in the history of the Supreme Court, Roe...
"Uncommonly Silly"—and Correctly Decided: The Right and Wrong of Griswold v. Connecticut and Why It Matters Today
It is one of the Supreme Court’s most consequential and controversial decisions, and no one should...
The Resurgence of Campaign Finance Regulation, Trumped?
Last March, during a Federalist Society teleforum discussing the Supreme Court’s 4-4 decision in Friedrichs v. California...
Size Doesn't Matter: Why Shrinking the Supreme Court Won't Promote Constitutionally Limited Government
The Supreme Court needs to be cut down to size. So argues Professor Michael Stokes...
Trump Trumps Ginsburg
In an astonishing editorial – astounding because of its source, not its content – entitled...
Trump Trumps Ginsburg
In an astonishing editorial – astounding because of its source, not its content – entitled...
Book Review: The Right to Try
Engage, Volume 17, Issue 1
Note from the Editor: This book review discusses the controversial concept of the constitutional “right...
Docs, Glocks, and "Gay Conversion Therapy"
The Eleventh Circuit recently upheld a Florida statute that restricted the freedom of doctors to...
Countdown to the National Lawyers Convention: What's "Conservative" about the "Roberts" Court?
Next week, I will participate in the Federalist Society’s National Lawyers Convention, in Washington, D.C.,...
Abuse of Discretion: The Inside Story of Roe v. Wade - Podcast
Religious Liberties Practice Group Podcast
Based on 20 years of research, including an examination of the papers of eight of...
Abuse of Discretion: The Inside Story of Roe v. Wade - Podcast
Religious Liberties Practice Group Podcast
Based on 20 years of research, including an examination of the papers of eight of...
Book Review: Cosmic Constitutional Theory: Why Americans Are Losing Their Inalienable Right to Self-Governance
Engage Volume 14, Issue 2 July 2013
Other Reviews of Cosmic Constitutional Theory: •Marc O. Degirolami, The New Republic, Sept. 2012: http://www.newrepublic.com/book/review/cosmic-constitutional-theory-judicial-restraint...
“Conscience Exemptions”
Engage Volume 14, Issue 1 February 2013
Note from the Editor: This paper discusses the meaning, history, and present application of conscience...
Oklahoma Supreme Court Strikes Down Informed Consent Law
State Court Docket Watch Article, Spring 2013
On December 4, 2012, in Nova Health Systems v. Pruitt, 2012 OK 103 (Okla. 2012),...
Uncommon Knowledge with Justice Antonin Scalia
Silicon Valley Lawyers Chapter and the Hoover Institution
On October 19, the Silicon Valley Lawyers Chapter and the Hoover Institution's Uncommon Knowledge hosted Supreme...
Solicitor General Kagan’s Confirmation Hearing
Online Debate
UPDATED: 11 AM, July 8, 2010 On May 10, 2010 President Obama nominated Solicitor General Elena...
Health Care Reform
Online Debate
Last Updated at 11:00 AM, Friday, October 27, 2009 The current debate about health care reform...
Conscience Protection in Health and Human Services
On August 21, 2008, Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Mike Leavitt proposed regulations...
The Sotomayor Nomination, Part III
Online Debate
On May 26th, President Obama nominated Sonia Sotomayor to replace David Souter as an Associate...
The Sotomayor Nomination, Part I
Online Debate
On May 26, President Obama nominated Sonia Sotomayor to replace David Souter as an Associate...
The Unbearable Wrongness of Roe v. Wade
Fordham Student Chapter
The following audio and video were recorded on March 5, 2009. This event was co-sponsored with the Catholic...
Bar Watch Bulletin August 9 & 10, 2008
SCOTUS Review, American Press & War, the 14th Amendment, Human Rights, Climate Change, Women in Law, and Immigration
The American Bar Association's Annual Meeting will be taking place from August 7-12 in New...
Same Sex Marriage
Online Debate
University of Minnesota Law's Dale Carpenter, Colorado Law's Robert Nagel, Northwestern University Law's Andy Koppelman, and the University...
Forum on Judge Bork's Article: "Individual Liberty and the Constitution"
Online Debate
In a recent article in "The American Spectator" Judge Bork set out some thoughts on individual liberty and...
Medellin v. Texas - Part II: Presidential & Congressional Power
Online Debate
On March 25, 2008 the Supreme Court decided the Medellin v. Texas case. The Court ruled...
Medellin v. Texas - Part I: Self-Execution
Online Debate
On March 25, 2008 the Supreme Court decided the Medellin v. Texas case. The Court ruled...
SCOTUS term
Online Debate
On June 28, 2007, the Supreme Court handed down its last decisions of the Spring...
Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act
Online Debate
On April 18, 2007, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban...
Abortion and the Courts
Online Debate
The Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act, passed by...
Bar Watch Bulletin February 2007
Preview of ABA Midyear Meeting, Interviews with Bill Neukom and Michael Wallace
Once again, ABA Watch will be reporting live from the ABA’s Midyear meetings, which are...
Bar Watch Bulletin August 9, 2004
Civil Rights panels, Torture Resolution Debate
ABA WATCH will be reporting daily from the American Bar Association's Annual meeting in Atlanta...
2003 Barbara K. Olson Memorial Lecture - Transcript
Address by Robert H. Bork, Senior Fellow, American Enterprise Instituteand Co-Chairman, Federalist Society Board of...
Hot Topics: Judicial Activism
When President George W. Bush announced his first nominations for the federal bench, he declared,...
Reflections on Judicial Independence
Federalism & Separation of Powers Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 2, Issue 1, Spring 1998
Before I address judicial independence, I want to recognize the tremendous contribution that the Federalist...
Whether There is a Constitutional Right to Die
Criminal Law & Procedure Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 1, Issue 2, Spring 1997
The existence of a constitutional right to die is currently under consideration by the United...
Romer v. Evans: The Supreme Court's Assault on Popular Sovereignty
Civil Rights Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 1, Issue 1, Fall 1996
Four years ago, the voters of Colorado enacted by referendum a state constitutional amendment (known...
Special Session I: Dobbs, Roe, Casey, and the Rule of Law
2022 National Lawyers Convention
The Mayflower Hotel1127 Connecticut Ave NW
Washington, DC 20006
2022 National Lawyers Convention
The Current State of the Legal Profession
The Mayflower Hotel1127 Connecticut Ave NW
Washington, DC 20006
