Dan Farber is the Sho Sato Professor of Law at the University of California, Berkeley. He is also the Co-Director of the Center for Law, Energy, and the Environment. Professor Farber serves on the editorial board of Foundation Press. He is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and a Life Member of the American Law Institute. He is the editor of Issues in Legal Scholarship.
Professor Farber is a graduate of the University of Illinois, where he earned his B.A., M.A., and J.D. degrees. He graduated, summa cum laude, from the College of Law, where he was the class valedictorian and served as Editor-in-Chief of the University of Illinois Law Review. After graduation from law school, he was a law clerk for Judge Philip W. Tone of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and then for Justice John Paul Stevens of the Supreme Court of the United States. Professor Farber practiced law with Sidley & Austin, where he primarily worked on energy issues, before joining the University of Illinois College of Law faculty in 1978. He was a member of the University of Minnesota Law School faculty from1981 to 2002, where he was the McKnight Presidential Professor of Public Law. He also has been a Visiting Professor at the Stanford Law School, Harvard Law School, and the University of Chicago Law School.
Among Professor Farber’s eighteen books are RESEARCH HANDBOOK ON PUBLIC CHOICE AND PUBLIC LAW (Elgar 2010) (with A. O’Connell); JUDGMENT CALLS: POLITICS AND PRINCIPLE IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (Oxford University Press 2008) (with S. Sherry); RETAINED BY THE PEOPLE: THE “SILENT” NINTH AMENDMENT AND THE RIGHTS AMERICANS DON’T KNOW THEY HAVE (Basic Books 2007); and LINCOLN’S CONSTITUTION (University of Chicago Press 2003).
*****
A person listed as a contributor has spoken or otherwise participated in Federalist Society events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on this list does not imply any other endorsement or relationship between the person and the Federalist Society. In most cases, the biographical information on a person's "contributor" page is provided directly by the person, and the Federalist Society does not edit or otherwise endorse that information. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues. All expressions of opinion by a contributor are those of the contributor.
West Virginia v. EPA and the Major Questions Doctrine
A Regulatory Transparency Project Webinar
TeleforumDobbs and the Supreme Court
TeleforumJurisdiction Stripping: Fact & Fiction Flowing Through the Mountain Valley Pipeline Case
Generally, when Congress strips courts of jurisdiction, it does so by implementing broad, forward-looking, statutory...
Jurisdiction Stripping: Fact & Fiction Flowing Through the Mountain Valley Pipeline Case
Generally, when Congress strips courts of jurisdiction, it does so by implementing broad, forward-looking, statutory...
Title IX and the Major Questions Doctrine
In West Virginia v. EPA, the Supreme Court held that the major questions doctrine requires...
Title IX and the Major Questions Doctrine
In West Virginia v. EPA, the Supreme Court held that the major questions doctrine requires...
Deep Dive Episode 231 - West Virginia v. EPA and the Major Questions Doctrine
Regulatory Transparency Project's Fourth Branch Podcast
In the historic decision of West Virginia v. EPA, the Supreme Court held that the Clean...