Facts of the Case
Two counselors for a private drug rehabilitation organization ingested peyote -- a powerful hallucinogen -- as part of their religious ceremonies as members of the Native American Church. As a result of this conduct, the rehabilitation organization fired the counselors. The counselors filed a claim for unemployment compensation. The government denied them benefits because the reason for their dismissal was considered work-related "misconduct." The state appellate court reversed the denial of benefits, finding that the denial violated their First Amendment right to the free exercise of religion. The state supreme court affirmed the appellate court. The U.S. Supreme Court vacated the Oregon Supreme Court's judgment against the disgruntled employees, and returned the case to the Oregon courts to determine whether or not sacramental use of illegal drugs violated Oregon's state drug laws (485 U.S. 660 (1988)). On remand, the Oregon Supreme Court concluded that while Oregon drug law prohibited the consumption of illegal drugs for sacramental religious uses, this prohibition violated the Free Exercise Clause. The case returned to the U.S. Supreme Court in this new posture.
Questions
Can a state deny unemployment benefits to a worker fired for using illegal drugs for religious purposes?
Conclusions
-
Yes. Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority, observed that the Court has never held that an individual's religious beliefs excuse him from compliance with an otherwise valid law prohibiting conduct that government is free to regulate. Allowing exceptions to every state law or regulation affecting religion "would open the prospect of constitutionally required exemptions from civic obligations of almost every conceivable kind." Scalia cited as examples compulsory military service, payment of taxes, vaccination requirements, and child-neglect laws.
A Case that Could Bring Great Clarity to Religious Jurisprudence
303 Creative v. Elenis
Free Exercise jurisprudence is a complete mess right now. Since Employment Division v. Smith, lower...
“Yet what should replace Smith?” How the question of what comes next exposed an ideological divide in the new SCOTUS majority.
When the Supreme Court handed down Fulton v. Philadelphia last summer, the 9–0 decision came...
The Search for a Workable Free Exercise Framework
Under Employment Division v. Smith, the Free Exercise Clause functions more like an antidiscrimination statute...
An Extended Essay on Church Autonomy
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
The doctrine of church autonomy[1] is distinct from the two more familiar lines of cases...
In the Shadow of Sherbert: An Understanding of Smith as Judicial Codification
Like all of the rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights, the right to freely...
Does The First Amendment Allow States To Require Religious Organizations To Pay for Abortions?
New York issued a new mandate that requires houses of worship to pay for abortions....
States have been violating religious schools’ First Amendment rights for decades. The Supreme Court may be about to stop them.
The Supreme Court rarely goes out of its way to make sweeping pronouncements. The Justices...
How the Founders’ Natural Law Theory Illuminates the Original Meaning of Free Exercise
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
In Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, the Supreme Court will consider whether Philadelphia’s 2018 policy...
NLC Panel of Interest: Religious Liberty and the New Court
A few days ago, on November 4, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a...
After Espinoza, What’s Left of the Establishment Clause?
Federalist Society Review, Volume 21
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
A Fulfillment of Judicial Prophecy: The Clash Between Religious Liberty and Nondiscrimination Law Reaches the Supreme Court
Catholic Social Services (CSS) of Philadelphia has offered services to needy children and families since...
Top Scholars, Diverse Religious Groups Ask SCOTUS to Reconsider Employment Division v. Smith—Again.
Twenty-nine years ago, a large and diverse group of legal scholars and religious organizations joined...
Can a New Establishment Clause Jurisprudence Succeed in Protecting Religious Minorities Where Lemon Has Failed?
Federalist Society Review, Volume 20
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
Religious Liberty after Scalia
Some people opine that Antonin Scalia was not a friend of religious liberty, and that...
The RFRA Decision: A Blow for Judicial Supremacy and Against Religious Freedom
Federalism & Separation of Powers Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 1, Issue 3, Fall 1997
It does not often happen that a "conservative" Supreme Court manages, in a single decision,...
From Employment Division v. Smith to Fulton v. City of Philadelphia: The Free Exercise Clause in 2021
Chattanooga and Nashville Lawyers Chapter - Online Event
Zoom Webinar
Does Fulton Mean the End of Employment Division v Smith?
Texas Student Chapter
Zoom Webinar -- University of Texashttps://us02web.zoom.us/j/87420307831
Austin, TX 78705
