Facts of the Case
Two counselors for a private drug rehabilitation organization ingested peyote -- a powerful hallucinogen -- as part of their religious ceremonies as members of the Native American Church. As a result of this conduct, the rehabilitation organization fired the counselors. The counselors filed a claim for unemployment compensation. The government denied them benefits because the reason for their dismissal was considered work-related "misconduct." The state appellate court reversed the denial of benefits, finding that the denial violated their First Amendment right to the free exercise of religion. The state supreme court affirmed the appellate court. The U.S. Supreme Court vacated the Oregon Supreme Court's judgment against the disgruntled employees, and returned the case to the Oregon courts to determine whether or not sacramental use of illegal drugs violated Oregon's state drug laws (485 U.S. 660 (1988)). On remand, the Oregon Supreme Court concluded that while Oregon drug law prohibited the consumption of illegal drugs for sacramental religious uses, this prohibition violated the Free Exercise Clause. The case returned to the U.S. Supreme Court in this new posture.
Questions
Can a state deny unemployment benefits to a worker fired for using illegal drugs for religious purposes?
Conclusions
-
Yes. Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority, observed that the Court has never held that an individual's religious beliefs excuse him from compliance with an otherwise valid law prohibiting conduct that government is free to regulate. Allowing exceptions to every state law or regulation affecting religion "would open the prospect of constitutionally required exemptions from civic obligations of almost every conceivable kind." Scalia cited as examples compulsory military service, payment of taxes, vaccination requirements, and child-neglect laws.
Plenary Panel 4: Justice Alito’s Impact on Religious Liberties & Speech
An Examination of the Jurisprudence of Supreme Court Associate Justice Samuel Alito
This panel will analyze Justice Alito’s contributions to the Supreme Court’s religious liberty and free...
Structure Over Spectacle: The Supreme Court's 2024 Term
Federalist Society Review, Volume 26
After several years of headline-grabbing decisions that reshaped national political debate—from abortion and affirmative action...
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections and Public Safety
Damon Landor, a state prisoner and practicing Rastafarian, refused to cut his hair as an...
A Seat at the Sitting - November 2025
The November Docket in 90 Minutes or Less
Each month, a panel of constitutional experts convenes to discuss the Court’s upcoming docket sitting...
Litigation Update: Miller v. McDonald
All fifty states mandate certain vaccinations for schoolchildren. Forty-six of them allow religious exemptions. New...
Litigation Update: Etienne v. Ferguson
The ongoing case of Etienne v. Ferguson raises profound questions about the interplay between religious...
Is Locke the Next Supreme Court Decision the Lower Courts Should Ignore?
I observed in a recent blog that the Supreme Court has begun to chide the...
Litigation Update: S.E. v. Grey
Encinitas Unified School District required two fifth-grade boys and their assigned kindergarten buddies to read...
A Significant Year for Religious Liberty?
An Update on the 2024-2025 Supreme Court Term
For the first time in years, the U.S. Supreme Court is addressing questions of religious...
The Roots, Applications, and Trajectory of the Church Autonomy Doctrine
The First Amendment’s Religion Clauses guarantee religious entities the freedom to make certain internal governance...
Litigation Update: Smith v. City of Atlantic City
The Atlantic City Fire Department requires all personnel who respond to fires or other emergencies...
Religious Liberty and the Court: Looking Ahead to the 2024-2025 Term
The Federalist Society is proud to host Mark Rienzi, President of the Becket Fund and...
A Religious Charter School? A Discussion on the Limits of State Action and Demands of the Free Exercise Clause
On June 25, 2024, the Oklahoma Supreme Court ruled that the nation’s first religious charter...
Daniel Webster Debate Series: Should the Court Overturn Smith?
The Federalist Society's Georgetown Law Chapter's Daniel Webster Debate Series
The Federalist Society's Georgetown Law Chapter'sDaniel Webster Debate Series presents Daniel Webster Debate Series:Should the...
Free Exercise, History and Tradition, and Preferred Pronouns: Key Takeaways from Vlaming v. West Point School Board
High school French teacher Peter Vlaming was fired from his job in West Point, Virginia,...
Free Exercise, History and Tradition, and Preferred Pronouns: Key Takeaways from Vlaming v. West Point School Board
High school French teacher Peter Vlaming was fired from his job in West Point, Virginia,...
Free Exercise, History and Tradition, and Preferred Pronouns: Key Takeaways from Vlaming v. West Point School Board
High school French teacher Peter Vlaming was fired from his job in West Point, Virginia,...
Litigation Update: Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v. Vullo
In 2017, New York passed a law requiring employers to cover abortions in their health...
Religious Liberty Apologetics
Federalist Society Review, Volume 25
Nick Reaves and Matthew Krauter have written a fine review, in this journal,[1] of my...
303 Creative, Masterpiece Cakeshop, and the Fate of Free Exercise for Wedding Vendors
Over the past decade, the tension between First Amendment rights and public accommodations laws has...
303 Creative, Masterpiece Cakeshop, and the Fate of Free Exercise for Wedding Vendors
Over the past decade, the tension between First Amendment rights and public accommodations laws has...
303 Creative, Masterpiece Cakeshop, and the Fate of Free Exercise for Wedding Vendors
Over the past decade, the tension between First Amendment rights and public accommodations laws has...
Virginia Supreme Court Rules State Constitution Includes Expansive Protections of Religious Exercise
In Vlaming v. West Point School Board, a former teacher’s lawsuit was given new life...
Challenges to Originalism V: Originalism is Not Up to the Task of Dealing with Modern Problems
The Federalist Society's Student Division & University of South Dakota School of Law Student...
Three Decades On: RFRA's Modern Pressure Points
In-person registration is now closed Livestream is available for virtual attendees. Join us on Wednesday,...
Litigation Update: OKPLAC, Inc. v. Statewide Virtual Charter School Board
After Carson v. Makin (2023) --a U.S. Supreme Court case holding that Maine may not...
Litigation Update: FCA v San Jose Unified School Dist.
Fellowship of Christian Athletes v. San Jose Unified School District concerned a Christian student club's...
Talks with Authors: Agreeing to Disagree: How the Establishment Clause Protects Religious Diversity and Freedom of Conscience
Agreeing to Disagree: How the Establishment Clause Protects Religious Diversity and Freedom of Conscience investigates...
Litigation Update: Bates v. Pakseresht
In Bates v. Pakseresht, Oregon mother-of-5 Jessica Bates is challenging the Oregon Department of Human...
Panel II: U.S. Supreme Court Review
2023 Florida Young Lawyers Summit
Featuring: Zack Smith, Legal Fellow and Manager, Supreme Court and Appellate Advocacy Program, Meese Center, The...
Panel I: Recent Developments on Parental Rights
Anxiety regarding parental rights in American healthcare and education is at an all time high. ...
Litigation Update: Apache Stronghold v. United States Goes En Banc at the Ninth Circuit
This case presents an intersection between Native Americans’ free exercise rights and the Government’s power...
Litigation Update: Apache Stronghold v. United States Goes En Banc at the Ninth Circuit
This case presents an intersection between Native Americans’ free exercise rights and the Government’s power...
Litigation Update: Apache Stronghold v. United States Goes En Banc at the Ninth Circuit
This case presents an intersection between Native Americans’ free exercise rights and the Government’s power...
A Cord of Three Strands: How Kennedy v. Bremerton School District Changed Free Exercise, Establishment, and Free Speech Clause Doctrine
Federalist Society Review, Volume 24
In 2015, Bremerton High School football coach Joseph Kennedy lost his job for kneeling at...
Apache Stronghold Pursues Claims That Conflict With Precedent
At the heart of our nation is a constitutional reverence that not only provides the...
Litigation Update: Groff v. DeJoy: Religious Liberty in the Workplace?
Join Stephanie Taub, Bruce Cameron, Blaine Hutchinson for discussion on Groff v. Dejoy, which was...
Gender Identity Policy Under the Biden Administration
Federalist Society Review, Volume 23
On the campaign trail, President Joe Biden said one of his top legislative priorities for...
Revisiting Jacobson
In 1905, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Jacobson v. Massachusetts, upholding a state's ability to enforce compulsory...
A Case that Could Bring Great Clarity to Religious Jurisprudence
303 Creative v. Elenis
Free Exercise jurisprudence is a complete mess right now. Since Employment Division v. Smith, lower...
Religious Liberty after Fulton v. City of Philadelphia
2021 National Lawyers Convention
The 2021 National Lawyers Convention took place November 11-13, 2021 at the Mayflower Hotel in...
Religious Liberty after Fulton v. City of Philadelphia
2021 National Lawyers Convention
The 2021 National Lawyers Convention took place November 11-13, 2021 at the Mayflower Hotel in...
“Yet what should replace Smith?” How the question of what comes next exposed an ideological divide in the new SCOTUS majority.
When the Supreme Court handed down Fulton v. Philadelphia last summer, the 9–0 decision came...
The Search for a Workable Free Exercise Framework
Under Employment Division v. Smith, the Free Exercise Clause functions more like an antidiscrimination statute...
An Extended Essay on Church Autonomy
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
The doctrine of church autonomy[1] is distinct from the two more familiar lines of cases...
In the Shadow of Sherbert: An Understanding of Smith as Judicial Codification
Like all of the rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights, the right to freely...
Religious Schools, Collective Bargaining, & the Constitutional Legacy of NLRB v. Catholic Bishop
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
It would be difficult to find a corner of American labor law more anomalous than...
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia - Post-Decision SCOTUScast
Featuring Mark L. Rienzi
On June 17th, 2021 the Supreme Court unanimously decided Fulton v. City of Philadelphia for...
From Employment Division v. Smith to Fulton v. City of Philadelphia: The Free Exercise Clause in 2021
Chattanooga and Nashville Lawyers Chapter - Online Event
On May 19, 2021 the Nashville and Chattanooga Lawyers Chapters co-hosted a discussion on the...
From Employment Division v. Smith to Fulton v. City of Philadelphia: The Free Exercise Clause in 2021
Chattanooga and Nashville Lawyers Chapter - Online Event
On May 19, 2021 the Nashville and Chattanooga Lawyers Chapters co-hosted a discussion on the...
Does The First Amendment Allow States To Require Religious Organizations To Pay for Abortions?
New York issued a new mandate that requires houses of worship to pay for abortions....
Litigation Update: Meriwether v. Hartop
In a decision issued on March 26, 2021, the Sixth Circuit held Professor Nicholas Meriwether,...
Litigation Update: Meriwether v. Hartop
In a decision issued on March 26, 2021, the Sixth Circuit held Professor Nicholas Meriwether,...
Litigation Update: Wisconsin Equal Protection and Race Based Scholarships
A biracial Wisconsin couple—Konkanok Rabieba and Richard Freihoefer—is suing the state of Wisconsin over its Minority Grant...
We Are Free for a Reason
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
A review of Free to Believe: The Battle Over Religious Liberty in America, by Luke...
Litigation Update: Jack Phillips and Masterpiece Cakeshop
Jack Phillips, of Masterpiece Cakeshop fame, is back in court for the third time since the Supreme...
States have been violating religious schools’ First Amendment rights for decades. The Supreme Court may be about to stop them.
The Supreme Court rarely goes out of its way to make sweeping pronouncements. The Justices...
How the Founders’ Natural Law Theory Illuminates the Original Meaning of Free Exercise
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
In Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, the Supreme Court will consider whether Philadelphia’s 2018 policy...
Welcome & Luncheon Debate: Resolved: Employment Division v. Smith Should be Overruled
23rd Annual Federalist Society Faculty Conference
Welcome12:00 pm - 12:15pm Hon. Lee Liberman Otis, The Federalist Society Luncheon Debate: Resolved: Employment...
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument Teleforum: Fulton v. City of Philadelphia
This teleforum reviews the November 4 oral argument in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia. In March...
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
featuring Mark Rienzi
On November 4, 2020, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Fulton v. City of...
NLC Panel of Interest: Religious Liberty and the New Court
A few days ago, on November 4, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a...
After Espinoza, What’s Left of the Establishment Clause?
Federalist Society Review, Volume 21
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
A Fulfillment of Judicial Prophecy: The Clash Between Religious Liberty and Nondiscrimination Law Reaches the Supreme Court
Catholic Social Services (CSS) of Philadelphia has offered services to needy children and families since...
Former Attorney General Meese Op-Ed on Fulton v. Philadelphia
Today, former Attorney General Ed Meese published an op-ed with Newsweek concerning a...
Credentials Not Required: Why an Employee’s Significant Religious Functions Should Suffice to Trigger the Ministerial Exception
Federalist Society Review, Volume 20
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
Will the Supreme Court Revisit Employment Division v. Smith?
In 1990, the Supreme Court startled the nation with a decision in Employment Division v....
Top Scholars, Diverse Religious Groups Ask SCOTUS to Reconsider Employment Division v. Smith—Again.
Twenty-nine years ago, a large and diverse group of legal scholars and religious organizations joined...
Can a New Establishment Clause Jurisprudence Succeed in Protecting Religious Minorities Where Lemon Has Failed?
Federalist Society Review, Volume 20
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
Panel 3: Religious Liberty after the USCCR Report
2017 National Student Symposium
In September, 2016, the United States Commission on Civil Rights released a report entitled Peaceful Coexistence: Reconciling...
Panel 3: Religious Liberty after the USCCR Report
2017 National Student Symposium
In September, 2016, the United States Commission on Civil Rights released a report entitled Peaceful Coexistence: Reconciling...
Religious Liberties: Is the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) the Future of Religious Liberty?
2016 National Lawyers Convention
In his seminal decision in Employment Division v. Smith in 1990, Justice Antonin Scalia held...
Religious Liberties: Is the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) the Future of Religious Liberty?
2016 National Lawyers Convention
In his seminal decision in Employment Division v. Smith in 1990, Justice Antonin Scalia held...
Stormans v. Wiesman: Paths to Strict Scrutiny in Religious Free Exercise Cases
Federalist Society Review, Volume 17, Issue 2
Note from the Editor: This article is about Stormans v. Wiesman, a case from the 9th...
Religious Liberty after Scalia
Some people opine that Antonin Scalia was not a friend of religious liberty, and that...
Trinity Lutheran Church v. Pauley
The U.S. Supreme Court recently agreed to review the Eighth Circuit’s decision in Trinity Lutheran...
Does the Establishment Clause Require Broad Restrictions on Religious Expression As Recommended By President Obama’s Faith-Based Advisory Council?
New Federal Initiatives Project
Brought to you by the Religious Liberties Practice GroupThe Federalist Society takes no position on particular...
Federalism Revived? The Printz and City of Boerne Decisions
Federalism & Separation of Powers Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 2, Issue 1, Spring 1998
The following program was sponsored by the Federalism and Separation of Powers Practice Group at...
The RFRA Decision: A Blow for Judicial Supremacy and Against Religious Freedom
Federalism & Separation of Powers Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 1, Issue 3, Fall 1997
It does not often happen that a "conservative" Supreme Court manages, in a single decision,...
Religious Liberty after Fulton v. City of Philadelphia
2021 National Lawyers Convention
The Mayflower Hotel1127 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
Stuart Lark is a partner in the firm's Colorado Springs office. He concentrates on corporate, tax, constitutional and transactional matters for nonprofit organizations. His experience includes joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions, tax exempt financing, corporate structure, IRS rulings, private foundations, unrelated trade or business income tax, property and sales tax, international structure and transactions, planned giving, government funding for religious organizations, faith-based employment rights, immigration, church property disputes and other religious liberty issues. He has published articles and given presentations on many of these issues. 
