Keir Lamont, CIPP/US, is a Senior Counsel with the Future of Privacy Forum’s U.S. legislation team. In this role he supports policymaker education and independent analysis concerning federal, state, and local consumer privacy laws and regulations. Keir previously held positions at the Computer & Communications Industry Association and the Program on Data and Governance at Ohio State University. Keir holds a J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center and a B.A. in Political Science & Economics from the University of Florida.
Panel Three: Tech / Consumer Protection & Data Privacy
Columbus, OHDeep Dive Episode 213 – After California and Virginia, What’s Next? Examining the State of State Data Privacy Legislation
Daniel Castro, Keir Lamont, Jennifer Huddleston
Data privacy and data security are tech policy concerns that resonate with many voters and...
After California and Virginia, What’s Next?: Examining the State of State Data Privacy Legislation in 2022
A Regulatory Transparency Project Teleforum
TeleforumOpioid Litigations and Public Nuisance: Updates From California, Oklahoma, and Ohio
John Shu
On February 25, 2022, Johnson & Johnson, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., McKesson Corp., Cardinal Health,...
Opioid Litigations and Public Nuisance: Updates From California, Oklahoma, and Ohio
TeleforumTech Roundup Episode 14 – Telematics in Cars and the Regulation of Auto Insurance
Ian David Adams
Ian Adams joined the podcast to break down the policy aspects of a recent Twitter...
Cochran v. SEC: Vindicating Article III Jurisdiction over the Structural Constitution and ALJs
Gregory G. Garre, Margaret A. Little
In Cochran v. SEC the Fifth Circuit court of appeals sitting en banc opened the doors...
Cochran v. SEC: Vindicating Article III Jurisdiction over the Structural Constitution and ALJs
Gregory G. Garre, Margaret A. Little
In Cochran v. SEC the Fifth Circuit court of appeals sitting en banc opened the doors...
For Cybersecurity, Is the Best Defense a Good Offense?
Atherton, CACochran v. SEC: Vindicating Article III Jurisdiction over the Structural Constitution and ALJs