Paul Avelar is the Managing Attorney of the Institute for Justice Arizona Office. He joined the Institute in March 2010 and litigates free speech, property rights, economic liberty, school choice and other constitutional cases in federal and state courts.
As the head of IJ’s national Braiding Freedom Initiative, Paul represents natural hair braiders across the country to protect their right to earn an honest living. The Initiative uses lawsuits, activism and research to remove laws that require potential braiders to undergo hundreds of costly training hours just to braid hair. Since IJ launched the Braiding Freedom Initiative in 2014, 12 additional states have freed braiders from unnecessary licensing burdens. Paul drafted the model Natural Hair Braiding Protection Act, which has been adopted in Arkansas, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Nebraska, New Hampshire, Texas and South Dakota. He is currently representing braiders in Missouri, where state laws infringe upon their right to earn an honest living.
In his free speech work, Paul has challenged numerous laws that trample First Amendment rights. In Arizona Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett, he represented candidates and independent groups in a successful U.S. Supreme Court challenge to the “matching funds” provision of Arizona’s publicly financed elections system. He represented grassroots groups and individuals in Arizona, Mississippi and Washington, where state laws burdened their political speech by requiring them to register with the government, to navigate complex regulations and to face fines and possible criminal penalties merely because they talked about political issues. In Washington, Paul protected a lawyer’s right to defend, pro-bono, the First Amendment rights of political speakers. Through litigation and legislation, Paul leads the fight against abusive civil forfeiture laws in Arizona and elsewhere.
Paul also co-authored the most comprehensive published study of economic liberty protections in the Arizona Constitution. The Chief Justice of the Arizona Supreme Court appointed Paul to the Task Force on the Review of the Role and Governance Structure of the State Bar of Arizona, where he dissented from the majority report and called on leaders to substantially reform the Bar and state regulation of the practice of law. He often speaks at law schools across the country about constitutional issues and his work at IJ.
Prior to joining IJ-AZ, Paul worked as an attorney in Philadelphia. He clerked for Judge Roger Miner on the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Justice Andrew Hurwitz on the Arizona Supreme Court, and Judge Daniel Barker on the Arizona Court of Appeals.
Paul graduated manga cum laude from the Arizona State University College of Law in 2004 and was elected to the Order of the Coif. He received his undergraduate degree from Princeton University in 2000.
2020 SCOTUS Review
Phoenix Lawyers Chapter
Why the Bar Exam Should Be Eliminated and Other Ways to Free Labor Markets
Faulkner Student Chapter
Zoom Webinar -- Faulknern/a
n/a, AL 36109
Beer: the Barriers of Entry into the Marketplace
North Carolina Student Chapter
UNC School of Law160 Ridge Road
Chapel Hill, NC 27517
Law and Innovation and Microbreweries (and Microdistilleries)
Concordia Student Chapter
Concordia School of Law501 West Front St.
Boise, ID 83702
Regulations and Microbreweries: Does Big Government Like Big Beer? Do They Still Like Big Beer?
Montana Student Chapter
Alexander Blewett III School of Law23 Campus Dr.
Missoula, MT 59812
The Issue of Occupational Speech in Masterpiece & NILF
It is not often that the Supreme Court takes two cases addressing an ever more...
Should You Need a License to Massage a Horse?
Regulatory Transparency Project's Fourth Branch Video
In 2012, Celeste Kelly received a cease-and-desist letter from the Arizona State Veterinary Medical Examining...
Litigating State Constitutional Issues
2017 Annual Western Chapters Conference
The past forty years have seen a surge in efforts to litigate under state constitutional provisions...
Litigating State Constitutional Issues
2017 Annual Western Chapters Conference
The past forty years have seen a surge in efforts to litigate under state constitutional provisions...
Panel Two: How do we balance disclosure with maintaining the privacy of participants in contentious issues?
2014 Annual Western Chapters Conference
Supporters of Proposition 8 have invoked NAACP v. Alabama to support their claims for anonymity,...