Navarette v. California - Post-Decision SCOTUScast
SCOTUScast 5-9-14 featuring Erin Sheley
SCOTUScast 5-9-14 featuring Erin Sheley
On April 22, 2014 the Supreme Court issued its decision in Navarette v. California. The question in this case was whether the Fourth Amendment requires an officer who receives an anonymous tip regarding a drunk or reckless driver to corroborate dangerous driving before stopping the vehicle.
In a 5-4 decision delivered by Justice Thomas, the Court held that the traffic stop in this case complied with the Fourth Amendment because, under the totality of the circumstances, the officer had reasonable suspicion that the truck’s driver was intoxicated. Chief Justice Roberts as well as Justices Kennedy, Breyer, and Alito joined the opinion of the Court. Justice Scalia filed a dissenting opinion, which Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined. The judgment of the Court of Appeal of the State of California, First Appellate District, was affirmed.
To discuss the case, we have Erin Sheley, who is a Visiting Associate Professor at the George Washington University School of Law.
[Return to the SCOTUScast menu]
Prof. Sheley joined the College of Law in 2018. Before coming to OU she was an Assistant Professor at the University of Calgary Faculty of Law. She has also served as a Visiting Associate Professor at the George Washington University Law School and an Olin-Searle Fellow at Georgetown University Law Center. Prior to academia she practiced for several years in the litigation group of the Washington, D.C. offices of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. While in practice she was commended by the Humane Society of the United States for her pro bono work in the prosecution of dog fighting sponsors. She is proud to have served on the Board of Directors of the Alberta Animal Rescue Crew Society.