Facts of the Case
In 1958, two residents of Virginia, Mildred Jeter, a black woman, and Richard Loving, a white man, were married in the District of Columbia. The Lovings returned to Virginia shortly thereafter. The couple was then charged with violating the state's antimiscegenation statute, which banned inter-racial marriages. The Lovings were found guilty and sentenced to a year in jail (the trial judge agreed to suspend the sentence if the Lovings would leave Virginia and not return for 25 years).
Questions
Did Virginia's antimiscegenation law violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?
Conclusions
-
Yes. In a unanimous decision, the Court held that distinctions drawn according to race were generally "odious to a free people" and were subject to "the most rigid scrutiny" under the Equal Protection Clause. The Virginia law, the Court found, had no legitimate purpose "independent of invidious racial discrimination." The Court rejected the state's argument that the statute was legitimate because it applied equally to both blacks and whites and found that racial classifications were not subject to a "rational purpose" test under the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court also held that the Virginia law violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. "Under our Constitution," wrote Chief Justice Earl Warren, "the freedom to marry, or not marry, a person of another race resides with the individual, and cannot be infringed by the State."
Principles of State Constitutional Interpretation
Federalist Society Review, Volume 23
State constitutionalism—the practice of state courts deciding cases on independent state constitutional grounds—is a vital...
Principles of State Constitutional Interpretation
Federalist Society Review, Volume 23
State constitutionalism—the practice of state courts deciding cases on independent state constitutional grounds—is a vital...
The Race Card in ARPA’s Food Supply Deck
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
It is an old aphorism that a prudent person should not watch the making of...
Liberty Month Revisited: The Separation of Powers, Stare Decisis, and the Constitution
This month we are sharing a selection of paired pieces from The Federalist Society's Liberty...
Book Review: The Right to Try
Engage, Volume 17, Issue 1
Note from the Editor: This book review discusses the controversial concept of the constitutional “right...
Book Review: The Right to Try
Engage, Volume 17, Issue 1
Note from the Editor: This book review discusses the controversial concept of the constitutional “right...
The Separation of Powers, "Stare Decisis," and the Constitution
Because the U.S. Constitution is dedicated to liberty through limited government, power is divided between...
The Separation of Powers, "Stare Decisis," and the Constitution
Because the U.S. Constitution is dedicated to liberty through limited government, power is divided between...
History and Recent Development in Same-Sex Marriage Litigation
Engage Volume 15, Issue 1
Note from the Editor: The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive national survey...
Same-Sex Marriage: A Variety of Perspectives on United States v. Windsor and Hollingsworth v. Perry
Engage Volume 14, Issue 1 February 2013
Decoding the Constitutional Challenges to Traditional Marriage By John C. Eastman* On December 7, 2012,...
Perry, Same-Sex Marriage, and Federal Constitutional Guarantees
Engage Volume 12, Issue 3, November 2011
Note from the Editor: This article and the article in this issue by George W....
Perry v. Schwarzenegger: Is Traditional Marriage Unconstitutional?
Engage Volume 12, Issue 3, November 2011
Note from the Editor: This article and the article in this issue by Mark Strasser...
Perry, Same-Sex Marriage, and Federal Constitutional Guarantees
Engage Volume 12, Issue 3, November 2011
Note from the Editor: This article and the article in this issue by George W....
Perry v. Schwarzenegger: Is Traditional Marriage Unconstitutional?
Engage Volume 12, Issue 3, November 2011
Note from the Editor: This article and the article in this issue by Mark Strasser...
Forum on Judge Bork's Article: "Individual Liberty and the Constitution"
Online Debate
In a recent article in "The American Spectator" Judge Bork set out some thoughts on individual liberty and...
Forum on Judge Bork's Article: "Individual Liberty and the Constitution"
Online Debate
In a recent article in "The American Spectator" Judge Bork set out some thoughts on individual liberty and...
Abortion and the Courts
Online Debate
The Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act, passed by...
Abortion and the Courts
Online Debate
The Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act, passed by...