Tara Leigh Grove is the Vinson & Elkins Chair in Law at the University of Texas School of Law. Grove graduated summa cum laude from Duke University and magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, where she served as the Supreme Court Chair of the Harvard Law Review. Grove clerked for Judge Emilio Garza on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and then spent four years as an attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, where she argued fifteen cases in the courts of appeals.
Grove’s research focuses on the federal judiciary, interpretive theory, and the constitutional separation of powers. She has published with such prestigious law journals as the Harvard Law Review, the Yale Law Journal, the Columbia Law Review, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, the New York University Law Review, the University of Chicago Law Review, the Virginia Law Review, the Texas Law Review, the Cornell Law Review, the Northwestern University Law Review, and the Vanderbilt Law Review. Grove has received awards for both her research and her teaching.
In 2021, Grove served on the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, a bipartisan commission created by President Biden and charged with examining proposals for Supreme Court reform. Since 2022, Grove has worked on the Princeton Initiative on Reclaiming the Constitutional Powers of Congress, which brings together former members of Congress, political scientists, and law professors. Grove serves as the Co-Chair of the section on the Appointments Process for the Princeton Initiative. Grove is a co-author of Low & Jeffries' Federal Courts and the Law of Federal-State Relations, a leading federal courts casebook, and she has served as the Chair of the Federal Courts Section of the Association of American Law Schools. Grove has been a visiting professor at both Harvard Law School and Northwestern Pritzker School of Law.
Binding Dicta in the Ninth Circuit
Stanford Student Chapter
Stanford, CAThe Conservative Case for Class Actions
Milwaukee Lawyers Chapter
Milwaukee, WITopics
Eighth Circuit Hears Major Pesticide Case
On December 15, 2022, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit heard...
Measuring and Evaluating Public Responses to Religious Rights Rulings
Creighton Roland Meland, Stephen Cranney
The story of Jack Phillips and his cake shop—Masterpiece Cakeshop—is by now familiar. Jack Phillips...
Free Speech, Wokeness, and Cancel Culture in the Legal Profession
Milwaukee Lawyers Chapter
Milwaukee, WIShowcase Panel I: The Legal Profession and Constitutional Culture
Patrick J. Bumatay, Jamal Greene, Tara Leigh Grove, Ashley Keller, John O. McGinnis
Lawyers and judges play an important role in a democratic republic like the United States. ...
Showcase Panel I: The Legal Profession and Constitutional Culture
Patrick J. Bumatay, Jamal Greene, Tara Leigh Grove, Ashley Keller, John O. McGinnis
Lawyers and judges play an important role in a democratic republic like the United States. ...
Topics
Is Colorado’s Compelling Interest in Eliminating Discrimination Sufficient to Overcome a Designer’s First Amendment Claims?
In 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, one of the marquee cases of the current Supreme...
Topics
Wilkins v. United States: Is the Quiet Title Act’s Statute of Limitations Jurisdictional, and How Does the Answer Affect Property Rights?
An age-old legal maxim—going back to Blackstone—states, “where there is a right, there must be...
Environmental Law After West Virginia v. EPA: Can the Biden Administration’s “Whole of Government” Approaches Survive Judicial Review?
Sean H. Donahue, Lisa Heinzerling, Derrick Morgan, Lindsay See, Lawrence VanDyke
The Biden Administration began with executive orders on an environmental policy agenda, directing a “whole...