Tara Leigh Grove is the Vinson & Elkins Chair in Law at the University of Texas School of Law. Grove graduated summa cum laude from Duke University and magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, where she served as the Supreme Court Chair of the Harvard Law Review. Grove clerked for Judge Emilio Garza on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and then spent four years as an attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, where she argued fifteen cases in the courts of appeals.
Grove’s research focuses on the federal judiciary, interpretive theory, and the constitutional separation of powers. She has published with such prestigious law journals as the Harvard Law Review, the Yale Law Journal, the Columbia Law Review, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, the New York University Law Review, the University of Chicago Law Review, the Virginia Law Review, the Texas Law Review, the Cornell Law Review, the Northwestern University Law Review, and the Vanderbilt Law Review. Grove has received awards for both her research and her teaching.
In 2021, Grove served on the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, a bipartisan commission created by President Biden and charged with examining proposals for Supreme Court reform. Since 2022, Grove has worked on the Princeton Initiative on Reclaiming the Constitutional Powers of Congress, which brings together former members of Congress, political scientists, and law professors. Grove serves as the Co-Chair of the section on the Appointments Process for the Princeton Initiative. Grove is a co-author of Low & Jeffries' Federal Courts and the Law of Federal-State Relations, a leading federal courts casebook, and she has served as the Chair of the Federal Courts Section of the Association of American Law Schools. Grove has been a visiting professor at both Harvard Law School and Northwestern Pritzker School of Law.
Environmental Law After West Virginia v. EPA: Can the Biden Administration’s “Whole of Government” Approaches Survive Judicial Review?
Sean H. Donahue, Lisa Heinzerling, Derrick Morgan, Lindsay See, Lawrence VanDyke
The Biden Administration began with executive orders on an environmental policy agenda, directing a “whole...
Environmental Law After West Virginia v. EPA: Can the Biden Administration’s “Whole of Government” Approaches Survive Judicial Review?
2022 National Lawyers Convention
Washington, DCShowcase Panel I: The Legal Profession and Constitutional Culture
2022 National Lawyers Convention
Washington, DCTopics
Environmental Law After West Virginia v. EPA: Can the Biden Administration’s “Whole of Government” Approaches Survive Judicial Review?
On Saturday morning, a panel of distinguished scholars and practitioners will debate whether the Biden...
Bruen’s Preliminary Preservation of the Second Amendment
Nelson Lund
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right...
Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
Tony Francois, Damien Michael Schiff, William Snape, Matthew Z. Leopold
One of the longest-standing environmental law challenges is how to define the scope of waters...
Feddie Night Frights: Return of the Living Constitution?
Eric J. Segall, Ilan Wurman
The Federalist Society’s Student Division &Boston University School of Law Chapter present Feddie Night Frights:Return...
Feddie Night Frights: Return of the Living Constitution?
It's on!
Kennedy v. Bremerton School District and the Future of the Establishment Clause
Silicon Valley Lawyers Chapter and Stanford Student Chapter
Stanford, CADeep Dive Episode 240 - Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency
Tony Francois, Damien Michael Schiff, William Snape, Matthew Z. Leopold
One of the longest-standing environmental law challenges is how to define the scope of waters...