Paul Ray leads The Heritage Foundation’s work on regulatory and economic policy as director of the Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies.
Ray brings to the role wide experience at the highest levels of government and private practice, including service as the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs—the federal “regulations czar”—within the White House’s Office of Management and Budget, to which position he was confirmed by the U.S. Senate in January 2020. As Administrator, Ray supervised the review of hundred of regulations and led federal efforts on regulatory reform.
Before his time at OIRA, Ray served as counselor to the U.S. Secretary of Labor and an attorney specializing in administrative appellate law. He began his legal career with clerkships for Judge Debra Ann Livingston of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and for Justice Samuel A. Alito of the United States Supreme Court.
Ray’s research focuses on administrative law and policy, the American Founding and constitutional order, and political philosophy, with a special focus on subsidiarity and the common good. He is a frequent speaker in Washington and around the country on the federal regulatory system.
In addition to his work at Heritage, Ray is a member of the Executive Committee of the Federalist Society’s Administrative Law Practice Group. He also serves on the Board of Innovations in Peacebuilding International, which promotes peaceful, ground-up solutions in war-torn regions.
Ray is a graduate of Harvard Law School, where he served on the Harvard Law Review, and holds a bachelor's degree from Hillsdale College. Hailing from Chattanooga, Tennessee, Ray currently resides in Washington, D.C.
*****
A person listed as a contributor has spoken or otherwise participated in Federalist Society events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on this list does not imply any other endorsement or relationship between the person and the Federalist Society. In most cases, the biographical information on a person's "contributor" page is provided directly by the person, and the Federalist Society does not edit or otherwise endorse that information. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues. All expressions of opinion by a contributor are those of the contributor.
FTC Negative Option, Junk Fee, and Commercial Surveillance Rulemakings
Weighing Costs, Benefits and Litigation Risk in a Post-Chevron Environment
A Conversation with Hon. Paul J. Ray
Indiana-Bloomington Student Chapter
Indiana University Maurer School of Law211 S Indiana Ave
Bloomington, IN 47405
The Administrative State and the Good Life
Hillsdale Student Chapter
Lane Hall33 East College St.
Hillsdale, MI 49242
West Virginia v. EPA, Two Years Later: Updates on the Major Questions Doctrine
Experts will examine the major questions doctrine, its role in regulatory litigation, and its place...
West Virginia v. EPA, Two Years Later: Updates on the Major Questions Doctrine
Experts will examine the major questions doctrine, its role in regulatory litigation, and its place...
FTC Negative Option, Junk Fee, and Commercial Surveillance Rulemakings
Weighing Costs, Benefits and Litigation Risk in a Post-Chevron Environment
Former FTC and OMB officials, joined by a longtime FTC practitioner, will discuss the current...
FTC Negative Option, Junk Fee, and Commercial Surveillance Rulemakings
Weighing Costs, Benefits and Litigation Risk in a Post-Chevron Environment
Former FTC and OMB officials, joined by a longtime FTC practitioner, will discuss the current...
Welcome: Opening Address & Is the Whole of Government Greater Than the Sum of its Parts?
EBRXII
During its first hours, the Biden Administration promised a Whole of Government approach to implementing...