Neil Chilson is a Senior Research Fellow for Technology and Innovation at the Charles Koch Institute. In this position, he will help spearhead the Institute’s continued efforts to foster an environment that encourages innovation and the individual and societal progress it makes possible.
Mr. Chilson was appointed the Federal Trade Commision’s (FTC) acting chief technologist in July 2017. His work focused on understanding the economics of privacy, convening a workshop on informational injury, and establishing the FTC’s Blockchain Working Group, among other things. Prior to his appointment, he was an advisor to then-Acting FTC Chairman Maureen K. Ohlhausen. In both roles he advised Chairman Ohlhausen and worked with Commission staff on nearly every major technology-related case, report, workshop, or other proceeding since January 2014, when he joined her office. Before he joined the FTC, Mr. Chilson practiced telecommunications law at Wilkinson Barker Knauer, LLP.
Mr. Chilson holds a law degree from the George Washington University Law School, a master’s degree in computer science from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, and a bachelor’s degree in computer science from Harding University.
*****
A person listed as a contributor has spoken or otherwise participated in Federalist Society events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on this list does not imply any other endorsement or relationship between the person and the Federalist Society. In most cases, the biographical information on a person's "contributor" page is provided directly by the person, and the Federalist Society does not edit or otherwise endorse that information. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues. All expressions of opinion by a contributor are those of the contributor.
Shapers of Cyber Speech – Silicon Valley and American Discourse
A Regulatory Transparency Project Webinar
Zoom WebinarDeep Dive Episode 117 – How to Approach Data Collection and Breaches in the Age of COVID-19
Regulatory Transparency Project Teleforum
TeleforumDeep Dive Episode 109 – Regulating by Consent Agreement: Examining FTC’s YouTube Settlement and Beyond
Executive Branch Review Week Teleforum
TeleforumSection 230 of the Communications Decency Act
A Capitol Hill Chapter Teleforum
TeleforumShould Big Tech Platforms Be Viewpoint Neutral? Should the Government Care?
Penn Law Federalist Society Symposium: Regulating Big Tech
Penn Law3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
Deep Dive Episode 163 – Shapers of Cyber Speech: Silicon Valley and American Discourse
Regulatory Transparency Project's Fourth Branch Podcast
In January, Twitter and Facebook removed President Trump and many of his followers' accounts while...
Shapers of Cyber Speech – Silicon Valley and American Discourse
A Regulatory Transparency Project Webinar
In January, Twitter and Facebook removed President Trump and many of his followers' accounts while...
The DOJ’s Weak Case Against Google
That's Debatable is a new blog initiative bringing together legal and policy experts with differing...
Explainer Episode 16 – An Update on Antitrust and Big Tech
Regulatory Transparency Project's Fourth Branch Podcast
Recent weeks have been chock-full of headlines regarding antitrust and big tech companies, from the House...
The Price of Privacy: A Debate over Corporate Surveillance
Regulatory Transparency Project's Fourth Branch Video
Data is being collected on each of us every day by the apps that we...