Facts of the Case
Several suits were filed against Chicago and Oak Park in Illinois challenging their gun bans after the Supreme Court issued its opinion in District of Columbia v. Heller. In that case, the Supreme Court held that a District of Columbia handgun ban violated the Second Amendment. There, the Court reasoned that the law in question was enacted under the authority of the federal government and, thus, the Second Amendment was applicable. Here, plaintiffs argued that the Second Amendment should also apply to the states. The district court dismissed the suits. On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed.
Questions
Does the Second Amendment apply to the states because it is incorporated by the Fourteenth Amendment's Privileges and Immunities or Due Process clauses and thereby made applicable to the states?
Conclusions
-
The Supreme Court reversed the Seventh Circuit, holding that the Fourteenth Amendment makes the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms for the purpose of self-defense applicable to the states. With Justice Samuel A. Alito writing for the majority, the Court reasoned that rights that are "fundamental to the Nation's scheme of ordered liberty" or that are "deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition" are appropriately applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court recognized in Heller that the right to self-defense was one such "fundamental" and "deeply rooted" right. The Court reasoned that because of its holding in Heller, the Second Amendment applied to the states. Here, the Court remanded the case to the Seventh Circuit to determine whether Chicago's handgun ban violated an individual's right to keep and bear arms for self-defense.
Justice Alito, writing in the plurality, specified that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment incorporates the Second Amendment right recognized in Heller. He rejected Justice Clarence Thomas's separate claim that the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment more appropriately incorporates the Second Amendment against the states. Alito stated that the Court's decision in the Slaughterhouse Cases -- rejecting the use of the Privileges or Immunities Clause for the purpose of incorporation -- was long since decided and the appropriate avenue for incorporating rights was through the Due Process Clause.
Justice Antonin Scalia concurred. He agreed with the Court's opinion, but wrote separately to disagree with Justice John Paul Stevens' dissent. Justice Clarence Thomas concurred and concurred in the judgment. He agreed that the Fourteenth Amendment incorporates the Second Amendment against the states, but disagreed that the Due Process Clause was the appropriate mechanism. Instead, Justice Thomas advocated that the Privileges or Immunities Clause was the more appropriate avenue for rights incorporation. Justice John Paul Stevens dissented. He disagreed that the Fourteenth Amendment incorporates the Second Amendment against the states. He argued that owning a personal firearm was not a "liberty" interest protected by the Due Process Clause. Justice Stephen G. Breyer, joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor, also dissented. He argued that there is nothing in the Second Amendment's "text, history, or underlying rationale" that characterizes it as a "fundamental right" warranting incorporation through the Fourteenth Amendment.
The Supreme Court's 2023 Term: Return to Original Meaning or a Dangerous "Paradigm Shift"?
Federalist Society Review, Volume 26
Each Supreme Court term over the past several years seems to produce more momentous decisions...
Originalism Carries On
Federalist Society Review, Volume 24
A review of Erwin Chemerinsky, A Momentous Year in the Supreme Court: October Term 2021...
Bruen’s Preliminary Preservation of the Second Amendment
Federalist Society Review, Volume 23
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right...
The False Halcyon of Heller: The Federal Juridical Response to Second Amendment Rights
On the narrowest reading, District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. City of Chicago...
Principles of State Constitutional Interpretation
Federalist Society Review, Volume 23
State constitutionalism—the practice of state courts deciding cases on independent state constitutional grounds—is a vital...
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen
Will the Supreme Court Recognize a Right to Bear Arms in Public?
In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010), the Supreme Court decided for...
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen
Will the Supreme Court Recognize a Right to Bear Arms in Public?
In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010), the Supreme Court decided for...
West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish [SCOTUSbrief]
Short video featuring David Bernstein
In 1936, Elsie Parrish and her husband sued the hotel where she worked, alleging that...
Protecting Economic Liberty in the Federal Courts: Theory, Precedent, Practice
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
The 14th Amendment meaningfully protects economic liberty. While this protection was originally housed in the...
Banning America's Rifle: An Assault on the Second Amendment?
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
The AR-15 rifle has aptly been called “America’s Rifle.” It is the most popular rifle...
Incorporation through the Privileges or Immunities Clause
Since the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868, the Supreme Court has incrementally incorporated...
Incorporation through the Privileges or Immunities Clause
Since the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868, the Supreme Court has incrementally incorporated...
State Court Docket Watch: State of Ohio v. Weber
At 4:00 a.m. on February 17, 2018, Frederick Weber’s wife called the police to report...
McDonald v. City of Chicago, Illinois [SCOTUSbrief]
Short video featuring Joyce Lee Malcolm
When Chicago resident Otis McDonald attempted to purchase a handgun, he was turned down because...
McDonald v. City of Chicago, Illinois [SCOTUSbrief]
Short video featuring Joyce Lee Malcolm
When Chicago resident Otis McDonald attempted to purchase a handgun, he was turned down because...
How the Founders’ Natural Law Theory Illuminates the Original Meaning of Free Exercise
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
In Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, the Supreme Court will consider whether Philadelphia’s 2018 policy...
Supreme Silence: A Decade of Second Amendment Litigation in the Circuits
The Federalist Society is pleased to announce its Student Blog Initiative, a project of the...
Second Amendment Historian Stephen Halbrook Demonstrates that Americans Have—and Always Had—a Fundamental Right to Carry Firearms Outside of the Home
Stephen Halbrook’s recent, important paper in the Federalist Society Review, To Bear Arms for Self-Defense:...
To Bear Arms for Self-Defense: A “Right of the People” or a Privilege of the Few? Part 2
Federalist Society Review, Volume 21
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
To Bear Arms for Self-Defense: A “Right of the People” or a Privilege of the Few? Part 2
Federalist Society Review, Volume 21
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
To Bear Arms for Self-Defense: A “Right of the People” or a Privilege of the Few? Part 1
Federalist Society Review, Volume 21
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
To Bear Arms for Self-Defense: A “Right of the People” or a Privilege of the Few? Part 1
Federalist Society Review, Volume 21
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
Originalism, Populism, and the Second Amendment Right to Keep and Bear Arms
2019 National Lawyers Convention
On November 15, 2019, the Federalist Society's practice groups hosted a special session for the...
Courthouse Steps Preview: NYSRPA v. City of NY
Civil Rights Practice Group Teleforum
New York City issues permits allowing authorized persons to register guns to keep at home...
Panel 1: The Original Understanding of “Privileges or Immunities”
2019 National Student Symposium
On March 15-16, 2019, the Federalist Society's student chapter at the ASU Sandra Day O'Connor...
Panel 1: The Original Understanding of “Privileges or Immunities”
2019 National Student Symposium
On March 15-16, 2019, the Federalist Society's student chapter at the ASU Sandra Day O'Connor...
Second Amendment Returns to Supreme Court in New York State Rifle
The U.S. Supreme Court is taking up a Second Amendment case for oral argument for...
New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. City of New York
For the first time in a decade, the Supreme Court has decided to hear a...
New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. City of New York
For the first time in a decade, the Supreme Court has decided to hear a...
Second Amendment Rights: Litigation & Legislation Update
Civil Rights Practice Group Podcast
The conclusion of the coming Supreme Court term will see the tenth anniversary of District of...
The CFPB, Justice Scalia, and Lone Dissents
This past Tuesday, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit—in arguably its...
Peruta, Flanagan, and the Right to Bear Arms in the Ninth Circuit
On June 9, 2016, an en banc panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals...
Caetano v. Massachusetts - Post-Decision SCOTUScast
SCOTUScast 4-20-16 featuring Nelson Lund
On March 21, 2016, the Supreme Court decided Caetano v. Massachusetts without oral argument. Jamie Caetano...
Caetano v. Massachusetts - Post-Decision SCOTUScast
SCOTUScast 4-20-16 featuring Nelson Lund
On March 21, 2016, the Supreme Court decided Caetano v. Massachusetts without oral argument. Jamie Caetano...
A Stunning Development in Second Amendment Jurisprudence?: Caetano v. Massachusetts - Podcast
Civil Rights Practice Group Podcast
In a per curiam opinion issued on March 21, 2016, the Supreme Court vacated and...
Massachusetts Stun Gun Laws at SCOTUS
On Monday, in Caetano v. Massachusetts, the Supreme Court issued a per curiam opinion vacating...
The Second Amendment and the Post-Scalia Court
The Second Amendment has suddenly been placed in jeopardy with the unexpected passing of Justice...
No Fly, No Buy (And No Due Process)
If you have been following the Democratic primaries or keeping up with President Obama’s recent...
The Circuit Splits Are Out There—and the Court Should Resolve Them
Engage Volume 16, Issue 2
Note from the Editor: This article argues that the U.S. Supreme Court should resolve a...
Illinois Supreme Court Ruling Explores Scope of Second Amendment
State Court Docket Watch Article
On September 12, 2013, in People v. Aguilar, the Illinois Supreme Court held that Illinois’s...
Book Review: Cosmic Constitutional Theory: Why Americans Are Losing Their Inalienable Right to Self-Governance
Engage Volume 14, Issue 2 July 2013
Other Reviews of Cosmic Constitutional Theory: •Marc O. Degirolami, The New Republic, Sept. 2012: http://www.newrepublic.com/book/review/cosmic-constitutional-theory-judicial-restraint...
Challenges to Illinois Gun Control Policy: People v. Aguilar - Podcast
Criminal Law & Procedure Practice Group Podcast
On September 12, 2013, the Illinois State Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in People...
Mandatory Liability Insurance for Firearm Owners: Design Choices and Second Amendment Limits
Engage Volume 14, Issue 1 February 2013
Some twenty-five years ago, one of us sketched out a rationale for using mandatory liability...
Mandatory Liability Insurance for Firearm Owners: Design Choices and Second Amendment Limits
Engage Volume 14, Issue 1 February 2013
Some twenty-five years ago, one of us sketched out a rationale for using mandatory liability...
Firearms Law and the Second Amendment - Faculty Book Podcast
Faculty Division Podcast 08-07-12 featuring Nicholas Johnson, Michael O'Shea and Adam Winkler
This podcast discusses Firearms Law and the Second Amendment: Regulation, Rights and Policy by authors...
Firearms Law and the Second Amendment - Faculty Book Podcast
Faculty Division Podcast 08-07-12 featuring Nicholas Johnson, Michael O'Shea and Adam Winkler
This podcast discusses Firearms Law and the Second Amendment: Regulation, Rights and Policy by authors...
No Conservative Consensus Yet: Douglas Ginsburg, Brett Kavanaugh, and Diane Sykes on the Second Amendment
Engage Volume 13, Issue 2, July 2012
Note from the Editor: This paper examines the largely unexplored subject of the different approaches...
Does the Fourteenth Amendment Protect Unenumerated Rights?
Engage Volume 12, Issue 2, September 2011
The current debates over the incorporation of the Second Amendment have reignited interest in the...
Does the Fourteenth Amendment Protect Unenumerated Rights?
Engage Volume 12, Issue 2, September 2011
The current debates over the incorporation of the Second Amendment have reignited interest in the...
McDonald v. City of Chicago - Post-Decision SCOTUScast
SCOTUScast 07-02-2010 featuring Steven G. Calabresi
On June 28, 2010, the Supreme Court announced its decision in McDonald v. City of...
Engage Volume 11, Issue 1, March 2010
*Online-Only Issue* ADMINISTRATIVE LAW & REGULATION The Regulation of Prescription Drug and Restricted Medical Device...
McDonald v. Chicago, the Meaning-Application Distinction, and "Of" in the Privileges or Immunities Clause
Engage: Volume 11, Issue 1
In McDonald v. Chicago, the Supreme Court will consider whether the Second Amendment right of...
Engage Volume 11, Issue 1, March 2010
*Online-Only Issue* ADMINISTRATIVE LAW & REGULATION The Regulation of Prescription Drug and Restricted Medical Device...
McDonald v. Chicago, the Meaning-Application Distinction, and "Of" in the Privileges or Immunities Clause
Engage: Volume 11, Issue 1
In McDonald v. Chicago, the Supreme Court will consider whether the Second Amendment right of...
McDonald v. City of Chicago – Post-Argument Debate SCOTUScast
SCOTUScast 03-03-10 featuring J. Gordon Hylton, Clark Neily, & Steven G. Calabresi
On March 2, 2010, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in McDonald v. City of...
McDonald v. City of Chicago – Cert Granted SCOTUScast Debate
SCOTUScast 11-09-2009 featuring Kurt Lash, Nelson Lund, and Clark Neily
On September 30, 2009, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case of McDonald v....
The Second Amendment and the Puerto Rico Weapons Act of 2020
Puerto Rico Lawyers Chapter
Hard Rock Cafe (Second Floor)1214 Ashford Ave
San Juan, PR 00917
Dialogue on Second Amendment Rights
Widener Law School, Harrisburg Library Building, Room L204 3800 Vartan WayHarrisburg, 19803