Facts of the Case
The state of New York enacted a statute known as the Bakeshop Act, which forbid bakers to work more than 60 hours a week or 10 hours a day. Lochner was accused of permitting an employee to work more than 60 hours in one week. The first charge resulted in a fine of $25, and a second charge a few years later resulted in a fine of $50. While Lochner did not challenge his first conviction, he appealed the second, but was denied in state court. Before the Supreme Court, he argued that the Fourteenth Amendment should have been interpreted to contain the freedom to contract among the rights encompassed by substantive due process.
Questions
Does the Bakeshop Act violate the liberty protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?
Conclusions
-
The Court invalidated the New York law. The majority maintained that the statute interfered with the freedom of contract, and thus the Fourteenth Amendment's right to liberty afforded to employer and employee. The Court further held that the New York law failed the rational basis test for determining whether government action is constitutional. The majority reasoned that the Bakeshop Act had no rational basis because long working hours did not dramatically undermine the health of employees, and baking is not particularly dangerous. Broadly interpreting state authority to regulate under its police powers, Justice Harlan in his dissent articulated reasoning that would inform later decisions in the post-Lochner era. Rather than requiring the government to prove that a law had a rational basis, he would require the party challenging the law to prove that the test was not met. (This is the current rule.)
Does the Original Meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment Protect a Right to Work?
Recent scholarship says yes. At least one federal judge agrees. And soon, we may have an answer from the U.S. Supreme Court.
The story of unenumerated rights is a familiar one. Most law students learn it in...
Against Living Common Goodism
Federalist Society Review, Volume 23
Today I want to discuss a new version of an old debate. In 1985, then-Attorney...
Principles of State Constitutional Interpretation
Federalist Society Review, Volume 23
State constitutionalism—the practice of state courts deciding cases on independent state constitutional grounds—is a vital...
What Happened to Natural Law in American Jurisprudence?
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
A Review of The Decline of Natural Law: How American Lawyers Once Used Natural Law and...
What Happened to Natural Law in American Jurisprudence?
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
A Review of The Decline of Natural Law: How American Lawyers Once Used Natural Law and...
Protecting Economic Liberty in the Federal Courts: Theory, Precedent, Practice
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
The 14th Amendment meaningfully protects economic liberty. While this protection was originally housed in the...
Mediating Rights: Anthony Sanders reviews Jamal Greene’s new book, How Rights Went Wrong
In a new Federalist Society Review article, Which Rights Are We Mediating? Anthony Sanders,...
Which Rights Are We Mediating?
Federalist Society Review, Volume 21
A review of How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights Is Tearing America...
State Court Docket Watch: Ladd v. Real Estate Commission
State Court Docket Watch: 2020 Edition
In Ladd v. Real Estate Commission,[1] the plaintiff Sarah Ladd was an entrepreneur who used...
State Court Docket Watch: Ladd v. Real Estate Commission
State Court Docket Watch: 2020 Edition
In Ladd v. Real Estate Commission,[1] the plaintiff Sarah Ladd was an entrepreneur who used...
The Mythical McCulloch
Federalist Society Review, Volume 21
A Review of The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of...
Originalism and Constitutional Property Rights Jurisprudence
2019 National Lawyers Convention
On November 16, 2019, the Federalist Society's Environmental Law & Property Rights Practice Group hosted...
Are Property Rights Protected Under the Constitution?
NLC Convention Panel: Environmental Law & Property Rights Practice Group
At this year’s National Lawyer’s Convention, the Property and Environmental Law Practice Group is hosting...
Are Property Rights Protected Under the Constitution?
NLC Convention Panel: Environmental Law & Property Rights Practice Group
At this year’s National Lawyer’s Convention, the Property and Environmental Law Practice Group is hosting...
The Federalist Paper, Summer 2019
On March 15–16, the Federalist Society student chapter at Arizona State University’s Sandra Day O’Connor College...
The Federalist Paper, Summer 2019
On March 15–16, the Federalist Society student chapter at Arizona State University’s Sandra Day O’Connor College...
Opening Remarks and Welcome to Arizona
2019 National Student Symposium
On March 15-16, 2019, the Federalist Society's student chapter at the ASU Sandra Day O'Connor...
Liberty Month Revisited: America is Exceptional—For Now
This month we are sharing a selection of paired pieces from The Federalist Society's Liberty...
Tenth Annual Rosenkranz Debate: Lochner v. New York
2017 National Lawyers Convention
RESOLVED: Lochner v. New York: Still Crazy After All These Years. The Tenth Annual Rosenkranz Debate was...
Tenth Annual Rosenkranz Debate: Lochner v. New York
2017 National Lawyers Convention
RESOLVED: Lochner v. New York: Still Crazy After All These Years. The Tenth Annual Rosenkranz Debate was...
2017 National Lawyers Convention Live Stream
Thank you for joining us online for the 2017 National Lawyers Convention. Below is...
NLC: The Tenth Annual Rosenkranz Debate
Since 2008, the Annual Rosenkranz Debate has been the Saturday centerpiece of the National Lawyers...
Differing Levels of Scrutiny for Economic Regulations: "Anything Goes" Rational Basis v. Rational Basis "With Bite"
Recently, the South Carolina Supreme Court issued a decision striking down a state law that...
Differing Levels of Scrutiny for Economic Regulations: "Anything Goes" Rational Basis v. Rational Basis "With Bite"
Recently, the South Carolina Supreme Court issued a decision striking down a state law that...
"Uncommonly Silly"—and Correctly Decided: The Right and Wrong of Griswold v. Connecticut and Why It Matters Today
It is one of the Supreme Court’s most consequential and controversial decisions, and no one should...
"Uncommonly Silly"—and Correctly Decided: The Right and Wrong of Griswold v. Connecticut and Why It Matters Today
It is one of the Supreme Court’s most consequential and controversial decisions, and no one should...
Book Review: The Right to Try
Engage, Volume 17, Issue 1
Note from the Editor: This book review discusses the controversial concept of the constitutional “right...
Book Review: The Right to Try
Engage, Volume 17, Issue 1
Note from the Editor: This book review discusses the controversial concept of the constitutional “right...
America Is Exceptional—For Now
American exceptionalism—and America is exceptional—is a result of the Scottish Enlightenment, the waves of immigration...
Panel I: Economic Theory, Civic Virtue and the Meaning of the Constitution
2011 National Student Symposium
Justice Holmes' dissent in Lochner v. New York is well-known for the statement, "[A] constitution is not...
Panel I: Economic Theory, Civic Virtue and the Meaning of the Constitution
2011 National Student Symposium
Justice Holmes' dissent in Lochner v. New York is well-known for the statement, "[A] constitution is not...
Forum on Judge Bork's Article: "Individual Liberty and the Constitution"
Online Debate
In a recent article in "The American Spectator" Judge Bork set out some thoughts on individual liberty and...
Forum on Judge Bork's Article: "Individual Liberty and the Constitution"
Online Debate
In a recent article in "The American Spectator" Judge Bork set out some thoughts on individual liberty and...
SCOTUS term
Online Debate
On June 28, 2007, the Supreme Court handed down its last decisions of the Spring...
Abortion and the Courts
Online Debate
The Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act, passed by...
Lochner v. New York – Does it Still need Rehab? The Longstanding Controversy Over Protecting Liberty via the Fourteenth Amendment
West Palm Beach Marriott Hotel 1001 Okeechobee BoulevardWest Palm Beach, 33401