Anastasia P. Boden

Senior Attorney, Pacific Legal Foundation

Topics: Civil Rights • Constitution • Due Process • Federal Courts • Federalism • Federalism & Separation of Powers • Federalist Society • First Amendment • Founding Era & History • Fourteenth Amendment • Jurisprudence • Law & Economics • Litigation • Philosophy • Politics • Regulatory Transparency Project • Separation of Powers • State Governments • Supreme Court

Anastasia Boden is a senior attorney in the Pacific Legal Foundation's Economic Liberty Project, where she challenges anti-competitive licensing laws and laws that restrict freedom of speech.

Anastasia’s practice largely consists of representing entrepreneurs and small businesses who find themselves in a bureaucratic nightmare when simply trying to earn an honest living. One of the most egregious examples of the laws she challenges are Competitor’s Veto laws, which essentially require entrepreneurs to get permission from their competitors before opening their doors. Anastasia has represented moving, limousine and shuttle companies in Competitor’s Veto lawsuits across the country, achieving legislative reform in Montana, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia.

In addition to litigating, Anastasia testifies before legislatures on the impact of occupational licensing on entrepreneurship. Her writings on all matters of law and liberty have been featured in the Washington Post, the Chicago Tribune, Forbes, and more. In 2015, Anastasia was selected for the Claremont Institute’s prestigious John Marshall Fellowship.

A southern-California native, Anastasia earned her B.A. with Dean’s Honors from the University of California, Santa Barbara. She was drawn east to attend law school at Georgetown, where she was Research Assistant to Professor Randy E. Barnett (aka the “Godfather” of the Obamacare challenge). Prior to joining PLF, she worked at the Cato Institute’s Center for Constitutional Studies and at Washington Legal Foundation.

When not lawyering, Anastasia can be found playing classical piano, competing at board games, or watching Jeopardy! She wants everyone to know that the Beatles are better than the Stones.

Deep Dive Episode 192 – Gender Based Board Quotas, the Fourteenth Amendment, and Meland v. Weber

Deep Dive Episode 192 – Gender Based Board Quotas, the Fourteenth Amendment, and Meland v. Weber

Regulatory Transparency Project's Fourth Branch Podcast

On June 21, 2021, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled a shareholder-plaintiff...

Gender Based Board Quotas, the Fourteenth Amendment, and Meland v. Weber

Gender Based Board Quotas, the Fourteenth Amendment, and Meland v. Weber

In-House Counsel Working Group, Civil Rights Practice Group, and Regulatory Transparency Project Teleforum

On June 21, 2021, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled a shareholder-plaintiff...

Click to play: Gender Based Board Quotas, the Fourteenth Amendment, and Meland v. Weber

Gender Based Board Quotas, the Fourteenth Amendment, and Meland v. Weber

In-House Counsel Working Group, Civil Rights Practice Group, and Regulatory Transparency Project Teleforum

On June 21, 2021, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled a shareholder-plaintiff...

Explainer Episode 27 – Occupational Regulations in the Beauty Industry

Explainer Episode 27 – Occupational Regulations in the Beauty Industry

Regulatory Transparency Project's Fourth Branch Podcast

In this episode, Anastasia P. Boden interviews Daniel Greenberg about his new article, "Regulating Glamour: A Quantitative Analysis...