Facts of the Case
John Kelly, acting on behalf of New York residents receiving financial assistance either under the federally-assisted program for Families with Dependent Children or under New York State's home relief program, challenged the constitutionality of procedures for notice and termination of such aid. Although originally offering no official notice or opportunity for hearings to those whose aid was scheduled for termination, the State of New York implemented a hearing procedure after commencement of Kelly's litigation.
Questions
Does a state's termination of public aid, without affording the beneficiary a hearing prior to termination, violate notions of procedural due process as set out in the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause?
Conclusions
-
Yes. In a 5-to-3 decision, the Court held that states must afford public aid recipients a pre-termination evidentiary hearing before discontinuing their aid. Noting that welfare benefits are statutory entitlements, rather than "privileges," the Court weighed welfare recipients' need for procedural due process against the competing considerations of the possible harm they might suffer from discontinuation and the government's interest in summary adjudication. The Court concluded that state interests in conserving administrative costs are not sufficient to override public aid recipients' interest in procedural due process. With respect to New York's newly implemented hearings, the Court found them deficient insofar as they did not permit recipients to present evidence, be heard orally in person or through counsel, or cross-examine adverse witnesses.
Can Americans Reconcile Our Constitutional System With an Expansive Administrative State?
Federalist Society Review, Volume 19
A review of: Bureaucracy in America: The Administrative State’s Challenge to Constitutional Government, by Joseph...
No Fly, No Buy (And No Due Process)
If you have been following the Democratic primaries or keeping up with President Obama’s recent...
Conservative & Libertarian Legal Scholarship: Administrative & Regulatory Practice
VI. Administrative & Regulatory Practice
[Return to Table of Contents] VI. Administrative & Regulatory Practice Introductory Materials Peter Schuck, Foundations...
Redressing Politicized Spending
Engage Volume 15, Issue 1 February 2014
Note from the Editor: This article is about politicized spending in the federal discretionary budget. ...
Did the Law Cause Columbine?
Transcript
APPEARANCES:JUDGE GEORGE NICHOLSON (Court of Appeals, State of California)PANELISTS:MR. TROY EID (Discussion Leader) (Chief Counsel...
