Rutledge v. Pharm. Care Management Association - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
featuring Max Schulman
featuring Max Schulman
On October 6, 2020, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments for Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Association. The issue in this case is whether states have the right to regulate pharmacy benefit managers, or PBM’s. Leslie Rutledge, Arkansas’s Attorney General, has petitioned the court to overturn the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth District’s prior decision to maintain Arkansas’ statute regulating PBMs’ drug reimbursement rates. Rutledge argues the statute is preempted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.
Max Schulman joins us to discuss this case’s oral arguments. Schulman is an associate in the Washington, D.C. office of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher.
Associate Attorney, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
Max Schulman is an associate in the Washington, D.C. office of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher. He practices in the firm’s Litigation Department.
Before joining the firm, Mr. Schulman served as a law clerk to the Honorable Gregory G. Katsas of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and the Honorable Sidney H. Stein of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Mr. Schulman earned his J.D. magna cum laude in 2017 from Harvard Law School, where he was an Articles Editor of the Harvard Law Review. He graduated cum laude in 2013 from Harvard College with an A.B. in Social Studies.
Mr. Schulman is admitted to practice in Maryland and the District of Columbia, and before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.