Facts of the Case
Adeil Sherbert, a member of the Seventh-day Adventist Church, was fired from her job after she refused to work on Saturday, the Sabbath Day of her faith. The Employment Security Commission ruled that she could not receive unemployment benefits because her refusal to work on Saturday constituted a failure without good cause to accept available work. Under South Carolina law, employers were not allowed to require employees to work on Sunday.
Questions
Did the denial of unemployment compensation violate the First and Fourteenth Amendments?
Conclusions
-
The Free Exercise Clause prohibits the government from setting unemployment benefits eligibility requirements such that a person cannot properly observe key religious principles. In a majority opinion written by Justice Brennan, the Court held that the state's eligibility restrictions for unemployment compensation imposed a significant burden on Sherbert's ability to freely exercise her faith. Furthermore, there was no compelling state interest which justified such a substantial burden on this basic First Amendment right. Justices Douglas and Stewart concurred in separate opinions. Justice Harlan, joined by Justice White, dissented on the ground that Seventh-Day Adventist was unavailable for Saturday work just as anyone who refuses Saturday work for personal reasons is unavailable, and that the effect of the Court's decision was to require South Carolina to make an exception in favor of those whose unavailability for work stems from religious convictions.
Virginia Supreme Court Rules State Constitution Includes Expansive Protections of Religious Exercise
In Vlaming v. West Point School Board, a former teacher’s lawsuit was given new life...
In the Shadow of Sherbert: An Understanding of Smith as Judicial Codification
Like all of the rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights, the right to freely...
In the Shadow of Sherbert: An Understanding of Smith as Judicial Codification
Like all of the rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights, the right to freely...
Religious Schools, Collective Bargaining, & the Constitutional Legacy of NLRB v. Catholic Bishop
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
It would be difficult to find a corner of American labor law more anomalous than...
Religious Schools, Collective Bargaining, & the Constitutional Legacy of NLRB v. Catholic Bishop
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
It would be difficult to find a corner of American labor law more anomalous than...
We Are Free for a Reason
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
A review of Free to Believe: The Battle Over Religious Liberty in America, by Luke...
We Are Free for a Reason
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
A review of Free to Believe: The Battle Over Religious Liberty in America, by Luke...
Can a New Establishment Clause Jurisprudence Succeed in Protecting Religious Minorities Where Lemon Has Failed?
Federalist Society Review, Volume 20
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
Can a New Establishment Clause Jurisprudence Succeed in Protecting Religious Minorities Where Lemon Has Failed?
Federalist Society Review, Volume 20
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
Religious Liberties: Is the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) the Future of Religious Liberty?
2016 National Lawyers Convention
In his seminal decision in Employment Division v. Smith in 1990, Justice Antonin Scalia held...
Religious Liberties: Is the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) the Future of Religious Liberty?
2016 National Lawyers Convention
In his seminal decision in Employment Division v. Smith in 1990, Justice Antonin Scalia held...
Religious Exemptions and Third-Party Harms
Federalist Society Review, Volume 17, Issue 3
Note from the Editor: This article discusses the effect that third-party harms should have on religious...
Religious Exemptions and Third-Party Harms
Federalist Society Review, Volume 17, Issue 3
Note from the Editor: This article discusses the effect that third-party harms should have on religious...
Stormans v. Wiesman: Paths to Strict Scrutiny in Religious Free Exercise Cases
Federalist Society Review, Volume 17, Issue 2
Note from the Editor: This article is about Stormans v. Wiesman, a case from the 9th...
Stormans v. Wiesman: Paths to Strict Scrutiny in Religious Free Exercise Cases
Federalist Society Review, Volume 17, Issue 2
Note from the Editor: This article is about Stormans v. Wiesman, a case from the 9th...
Religious Liberty after Scalia
Some people opine that Antonin Scalia was not a friend of religious liberty, and that...
Horne v. United States Department of Agriculture: The Takings Clause and the Administrative State
Engage Volume 16, Issue 3
Note from the Editor: This article discusses and praises Horne v. United States Department of...
Horne v. United States Department of Agriculture: The Takings Clause and the Administrative State
Engage Volume 16, Issue 3
Note from the Editor: This article discusses and praises Horne v. United States Department of...
Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
Engage Volume 15, Issue 1 February 2014
Note from the Editor: This article is a discussion about the Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby...
Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
Engage Volume 15, Issue 1 February 2014
Note from the Editor: This article is a discussion about the Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby...
Arkansas Supreme Court Strikes Down Ban on Adoption by Unmarried Cohabitating Couples
State Court Docket Watch Fall 2011
In a unanimous opinion handed down on April 7, 2011, the Arkansas Supreme Court invalidated—on...
Arkansas Supreme Court Strikes Down Ban on Adoption by Unmarried Cohabitating Couples
State Court Docket Watch Fall 2011
In a unanimous opinion handed down on April 7, 2011, the Arkansas Supreme Court invalidated—on...
Courthouse Steps Decision Webinar: Fulton v. City of Philadelphia
Religious Liberties Practice Group Teleforum
Teleforum2016 National Lawyers Convention
The Jurisprudence and Legacy of Justice Scalia
The Mayflower Hotel1127 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036