Facts of the Case
Responding to a reported weapons disturbance in a private residence, Houston police entered John Lawrence's apartment and saw him and another adult man, Tyron Garner, engaging in a private, consensual sexual act. Lawrence and Garner were arrested and convicted of deviate sexual intercourse in violation of a Texas statute forbidding two persons of the same sex to engage in certain intimate sexual conduct. In affirming, the State Court of Appeals held that the statute was not unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, with Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986), controlling.
Questions
Do the criminal convictions of John Lawrence and Tyron Garner under the Texas "Homosexual Conduct" law, which criminalizes sexual intimacy by same-sex couples, but not identical behavior by different-sex couples, violate the Fourteenth Amendment guarantee of equal protection of laws? Do their criminal convictions for adult consensual sexual intimacy in the home violate their vital interests in liberty and privacy protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment? Should Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986), be overruled?
Conclusions
-
No, yes, and yes. In a 6-3 opinion delivered by Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, the Court held that the Texas statute making it a crime for two persons of the same sex to engage in certain intimate sexual conduct violates the Due Process Clause. After explaining what it deemed the doubtful and overstated premises of Bowers, the Court reasoned that the case turned on whether Lawrence and Garner were free as adults to engage in the private conduct in the exercise of their liberty under the Due Process Clause. "Their right to liberty under the Due Process Clause gives them the full right to engage in their conduct without intervention of the government," wrote Justice Kennedy. "The Texas statute furthers no legitimate state interest which can justify its intrusion into the personal and private life of the individual," continued Justice Kennedy. Accordingly, the Court overruled Bowers. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Justices Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia, with whom Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and Justices Thomas joined, filed dissents.
Gay Marriage and the Federal Judicial Confirmation Process
Last year saw momentous advances in civil rights for homosexual persons. First, in Lawrence v....
The Separation of Powers, "Stare Decisis," and the Constitution
Because the U.S. Constitution is dedicated to liberty through limited government, power is divided between...
"Uncommonly Silly"—and Correctly Decided: The Right and Wrong of Griswold v. Connecticut and Why It Matters Today
It is one of the Supreme Court’s most consequential and controversial decisions, and no one should...
The Sovereignty Implications of Two Recent Supreme Court Decisions
The Supreme Court, in two recent cases (Lawrence v. Texas and Atkins v. Virginia) is continuing...
Forum on Judge Bork's Article: "Individual Liberty and the Constitution"
Online Debate
In a recent article in "The American Spectator" Judge Bork set out some thoughts on individual liberty and...
History and Recent Development in Same-Sex Marriage Litigation
Engage Volume 15, Issue 1
Note from the Editor: The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive national survey...
Same-Sex Marriage: A Variety of Perspectives on United States v. Windsor and Hollingsworth v. Perry
Engage Volume 14, Issue 1 February 2013
Decoding the Constitutional Challenges to Traditional Marriage By John C. Eastman* On December 7, 2012,...
Perry, Same-Sex Marriage, and Federal Constitutional Guarantees
Engage Volume 12, Issue 3, November 2011
Note from the Editor: This article and the article in this issue by George W....
State Court Docket Watch: Woods v. Seattle Union Gospel Mission
Washington Supreme Court Issues Mixed Ruling on Religious Employer Exemption
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
Conservative & Libertarian Legal Scholarship: Family Law
XIII. Family Law
[Return to Table of Contents] XIII. Family Law Philosophical Underpinnings Individual Responsibility and the Law,...
Perry v. Schwarzenegger: Is Traditional Marriage Unconstitutional?
Engage Volume 12, Issue 3, November 2011
Note from the Editor: This article and the article in this issue by Mark Strasser...
Barwatch Bulletin from August 11, 2007
August 11, 2007
ABA Opening AssemblyJustice Stephen Breyer offered remarks at the ABA Opening Assembly. He opened by...
Bullet-Point Summary of Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Comm’n.
SCOTUS decided Masterpiece Cakeshop this morning. The opinion may be found here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-111_j4el.pdf (1) The vote...
Which Rights Are We Mediating?
Federalist Society Review, Volume 21
A review of How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights Is Tearing America...
Book Review: Our Republican Constitution: Securing the Liberty and Sovereignty of We the People
Federalist Society Review, Volume 17, Issue 2
Note from the Editor: This article favorably reviews Randy Barnett’s new book about the Constitution....
Protecting Economic Liberty in the Federal Courts: Theory, Precedent, Practice
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
The 14th Amendment meaningfully protects economic liberty. While this protection was originally housed in the...
Unleashed and Unbound: Living Textualism in Bostock v. Clayton County
Federalist Society Review, Volume 21
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
Conservative & Libertarian Legal Scholarship: Constitutional Law
V. Constitutional Law
[Return to Table of Contents] V. Constitutional Law Note: The Heritage Foundation has published a...
Book Review: Cosmic Constitutional Theory: Why Americans Are Losing Their Inalienable Right to Self-Governance
Engage Volume 14, Issue 2 July 2013
Other Reviews of Cosmic Constitutional Theory: •Marc O. Degirolami, The New Republic, Sept. 2012: http://www.newrepublic.com/book/review/cosmic-constitutional-theory-judicial-restraint...
Bar Watch Bulletin November 2003
Spirit of Excellence Awardees
--The ABA has announced its "Spirit of Excellence Awards" which will be presented by the...
The Employment Non-Discrimination Act
New Federal Initiatives Project
Brought to you by the Religious Liberties Practice Group The "Employment Non-Discrimination Act" ("ENDA") would amend...
Why the NSA Data Seizures Are Unconstitutional
The Tamps Club Bank of America Plaza 101 East Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 4200 (813) 229-6028Tampa, 33602