Tara Leigh Grove is the Vinson & Elkins Chair in Law at the University of Texas School of Law. Grove graduated summa cum laude from Duke University and magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, where she served as the Supreme Court Chair of the Harvard Law Review. Grove clerked for Judge Emilio Garza on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and then spent four years as an attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, where she argued fifteen cases in the courts of appeals.
Grove’s research focuses on the federal judiciary, interpretive theory, and the constitutional separation of powers. She has published with such prestigious law journals as the Harvard Law Review, the Yale Law Journal, the Columbia Law Review, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, the New York University Law Review, the University of Chicago Law Review, the Virginia Law Review, the Texas Law Review, the Cornell Law Review, the Northwestern University Law Review, and the Vanderbilt Law Review. Grove has received awards for both her research and her teaching.
In 2021, Grove served on the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, a bipartisan commission created by President Biden and charged with examining proposals for Supreme Court reform. Since 2022, Grove has worked on the Princeton Initiative on Reclaiming the Constitutional Powers of Congress, which brings together former members of Congress, political scientists, and law professors. Grove serves as the Co-Chair of the section on the Appointments Process for the Princeton Initiative. Grove is a co-author of Low & Jeffries' Federal Courts and the Law of Federal-State Relations, a leading federal courts casebook, and she has served as the Chair of the Federal Courts Section of the Association of American Law Schools. Grove has been a visiting professor at both Harvard Law School and Northwestern Pritzker School of Law.
Topics
Should Lower Courts Continue to Apply Employment Division v. Smith?
The Supreme Court in 1990 in Employment Division v. Smith held that a rational regulation...
Lackey v. Stinnie - Post-Decision SCOTUScast
William R. Maurer
On February 25, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court issued their 7-2 opinion in Lackey v. Stinnie. The...
Topics
Two Supreme Court Justices Challenge “Confusing” McDonnell Douglas Employment Discrimination Framework
On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari in Hittle v. City of Stockton, California,...
Panel: The Future of Administrative Statutes
Eric R. Bolinder, Tara Leigh Grove, Joshua Kleinfeld, Brian Gary Slocum, Ilan Wurman
This panel will explore the Court’s recent decision in Loper Bright as well as its...
Luncheon Panel: Abortion Law After Dobbs
Stephanie Barclay, Sherif Girgis, Rachel Rebouché, Stephen E. Sachs, Mary Ziegler
Featuring: Prof. Stephanie Barclay, Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center Dean Rachel Rebouché,...
Panel: Regulation of Algorithms
Adam Candeub, Gregory Dickinson, Dhruva Krishna, Christina M. Mulligan, Saurabh Vishnubhakat, Eugene Volokh
Opaque algorithms shape what news stories you see on social media, dictate how artificial intelligence...
Luncheon Discussion: South Africa v. Israel Case: Allegations of Israeli Genocide in Gaza
Samuel Estreicher, Chimène Keitner, David R. Stras
Featuring: Prof. Sam Estreicher, Dwight D. Opperman Professor of Public Law, New York University...
Disinformation in Broadcasting and the Public Interest Standard
Robert Corn-Revere, David Gibber, Patricia J. Paoletta, Daniel Suhr
The Communications Act of 1934 requires that licensees operate consistent with the “public interest convenience...
Topics
The Poison Pill in the Peanut Butter: A Culture-War Lawsuit Quietly Threatens Disability Rights
When a dog doesn’t want to take a pill, you coat it in peanut butter....
Jewish, Greek, and Roman Influences on Western Legal Tradition
Roy Kalman Altman, Nicholas Cole, Josh Hammer
Join us for an examination of the contributions of Jewish, Greek, and Roman influences and...