Matthew Cavedon is the Director of the Cato Institute’s Project on Criminal Justice. He focuses on reforming plea-driven mass adjudication, ensuring police accountability, and defending constitutional criminal originalism. Cavedon’s scholarship has been published (or is forthcoming in) publications including the Arizona State Law Journal, Cato Supreme Court Review, Seattle University Law Review, and Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy. Formerly a Georgia public defender and fellow at the Institute for Justice, Cavedon has taught law school courses on criminal law and procedure, as well as the First Amendment. Cavedon clerked for a U.S. district court and the Supreme Court of Georgia. He came to Cato following a fellowship at the Emory University Center for the Study of Law and Religion.
*****
A person listed on this page has spoken or otherwise participated in Federalist Society events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on this list does not imply any other endorsement or relationship between the person and the Federalist Society. In most cases, the biographical information on a person's bio page is provided directly by the person, and the Federalist Society does not edit or otherwise endorse that information. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues. All expressions of opinion by a speaker or author are those of the individual.
From Pretended Offences to Real Rights: Revolutionary Inspirations for Constitutional Criminal Protections
Charleston Lawyer Chapter
Turner Padget40 Calhoun St #200
Charleston, SC 29401
FACE Act
Friend or Foe?
Is the FACE Act being enforced as Congress originally intended or has its selected application...
FACE Act
Friend or Foe?
Is the FACE Act being enforced as Congress originally intended or has its selected application...
Courthouse Steps Decision: Ellingburg v. United States
Ellingburg v. United States concerned whether forced restitution under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996...
Courthouse Steps Decision: Ellingburg v. United States
Ellingburg v. United States concerned whether forced restitution under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996...
A Seat at the Sitting - October 2025
The October Docket in 90 Minutes or Less
Each month, a panel of constitutional experts convenes to discuss the Court’s upcoming docket sitting...