Professor Bruce N. Cameron teaches Employment Discrimination with a Focus on Faith, Labor Law, and administers the Right to Work Practicum. Prior to coming to Regent, he spent over 30 years litigating religious freedom and constitutional law cases in the employment context. During that time, he never lost a Title VII religious accommodation case in court. He counseled employees in virtually every state as to their rights and formally represented clients in administrative or judicial proceedings in at least 25 states. Cameron is currently on staff with the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation. This is his 47th year with the Foundation and his 16th year teaching at Regent Law.
Cameron was an Andrews Scholar, an intern with the U.S. Attorney’s Office, and a member of the U.S. Department of Justice Honors Program. He was a member of the Virginia State Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (2015-2019). He is a member of the Accrediting Association of Seventh-day Adventist Schools, Colleges, and Universities; the Federalist Society, the Christian Legal Society, several state bars, and a number of federal bars, including the Bar of the U.S. Supreme Court. He has appeared frequently on television and radio shows, including appearances on Dr. Dobson’s Focus on the Family. His hobbies over the years are sports cars, motorcycles, sailing, and studying and teaching the Bible.
Litigation Update: Groff v. DeJoy: Religious Liberty in the Workplace?
TeleforumTopics
Second Circuit Hears Preemption Challenge to New York’s Broadband Rate Regulation Law
On January 12, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held oral argument...
Supreme Court Round Up
Indiana-Indianapolis Student Chapter
Indianapolis, INTopics
Victory for Common Sense: Federal Court Holds Title IX Religious Exemption Not Discriminatory
Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 is the little statute inviting big...
Panel Four: Three Perspectives on the Independent State Legislature Doctrine - Moore v. Harper
Charles T. Canady, Derek T. Muller, Daniel E. Nordby, Edward Mark Wenger
Under the U.S. Constitution, does the state legislative body, independent of any constraints by state...
Panel Four: Three Perspectives on the Independent State Legislature Doctrine - Moore v. Harper
Ninth Annual Florida Chapters Conference
Lake Buena Vista, FLTopics
Humane Society v. USDA Breathes Life into Unpublished Administrative Rules
On July 22, 2022, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia...
SCOTUS vs. The Internet
Oklahoma City Student Chapter
OKC, OKTopics
Gonzalez, Google, and Section 230: All on the same side?
After avoiding Section 230 for thirty years, the Supreme Court will finally hear oral arguments...
Arbitration and the Supremes: A Roundup of Recent and Anticipated Supreme Court Arbitration Precedents
Manuel Farach, Harout J. Samra, Joshua B. Simmons
Domestic and international arbitration has been the subject of considerable activity before the U.S. Supreme...