Anastasia Boden is Director of Constitutional Scholarship at Pacific Legal Foundation, where she leads the organization’s Supreme Court commentary and directs scholarly analysis in support of the firm’s litigation. She has represented entrepreneurs and small businesses nationwide in challenges to onerous licensing regimes, anti-competitive titling restrictions, Certificate of Need (“competitor’s veto”) laws, and other forms of unnecessary red tape that block economic opportunity.
Prior to this role, Anastasia developed nearly a dozen constitutional challenges to Certificate of Need laws across the country, helping spur legislative reform in Montana, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia. Her victories include a ruling invalidating Houston’s busking restrictions, multiple appellate decisions expanding access to the courts for civil rights plaintiffs, and the legislative repeal of Virginia’s happy-hour advertising ban.
Her writings on law and liberty have been featured in USA Today, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, the Los Angeles Times, the Chicago Tribune, Forbes, and more, and she has appeared on Headline News, CBS News, Fox News, ReasonTV, Newsmax, and John Stossel. In 2020, she was featured on Libertarian Party presidential candidate Jo Jorgensen’s Supreme Court shortlist.
Anastasia earned her BA with dean’s honors from the University of California, Santa Barbara, and her JD from Georgetown University Law Center, where she was research assistant to Professor Randy E. Barnett—the “intellectual godfather” of the constitutional challenge to Obamacare. She is the co-creator of the podcast Dissed, about infamous Supreme Court dissents. She authors the biweekly newsletter SCOTUS Scoop and the column, “In Dissent” for SCOTUSblog.
*****
A person listed on this page has spoken or otherwise participated in Federalist Society events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on this list does not imply any other endorsement or relationship between the person and the Federalist Society. In most cases, the biographical information on a person's bio page is provided directly by the person, and the Federalist Society does not edit or otherwise endorse that information. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues. All expressions of opinion by a speaker or author are those of the individual.
Supreme Court Preview - NM
New Mexico Lawyer Chapter
Indian Pueblo Cultural Center2401 12th Street Northwest, Silver Room
Albuquerque, NM 87104
Restoring The Constitution’s Original Meaning Through The Declaration of Independence
Fresno Lawyer Chapter
Law Offices of McCormick Barstow7647 N Fresno St
Fresno, CA 93720
Panel 1: America 250: The Declaration of Independence and American Sovereignty
2026 Third Circuit Chapters Conference
Philadelphia, PAConstitutional Battle: Economic Liberties vs. State Police Power
Utah Lawyer Chapter
Kirton McConkie, 20th Floor36 S. State Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
Supreme Court Preview - Sacramento
Sacramento Lawyer Chapters
Camden Spit & Larder555 Capitol Mall #100
Sacramento, CA 95813
Panel II: Amending the Florida Constitution: Ballot Initiatives and Judicial Review
2024 Florida Chapters Conference
The citizen-initiative process allows the People of Florida to propose amendments to the state constitution,...
Panel II: Amending the Florida Constitution: Ballot Initiatives and Judicial Review
2024 Florida Chapters Conference
The citizen-initiative process allows the People of Florida to propose amendments to the state constitution,...
Virginia’s New Approach to Regulatory Modernization
A Regulatory Transparency Project Webinar
Regulatory modernization has been a topic of nationwide interest in recent months. With its recently...
Virginia’s New Approach to Regulatory Modernization
A Regulatory Transparency Project Webinar
Regulatory modernization has been a topic of nationwide interest in recent months. With its recently...
A Seat at the Sitting - April 2023
The April Docket in 90 Minutes or Less
Each month, a panel of constitutional experts convenes to discuss the Court’s upcoming docket sitting...