Anya Bidwell (née Cherkasova) leads IJ’s Project on Immunity and Accountability (“PIA”). Through this project, Anya works to promote judicial engagement and ensure that government officials are held to account when they violate individuals’ constitutional rights. Anya also serves as an adviser on the American Law Institute’s Restatement of the Law, Constitutional Torts project.
One of Anya’s PIA cases—Gonzalez v. Trevino—was heard by the United States Supreme Court on March 20, 2024. She argued the case for the petitioner, with the goal of convincing the Justices that retaliatory arrests not involving on-the-spot decisions by police officers should be actionable under the First Amendment regardless of probable cause. The decision is expected in June.
This was Anya’s third appearance before the U.S. Supreme Court. She second-chaired Brownback v. King (an excessive force case) and Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Association v. Thomas (a commerce clause case) in November 2020 and January 2019 respectfully.
Before joining IJ, Anya worked for a top national law firm, handling cases in trial and appellate courts. She earned her J.D. with honors from the University of Texas. Two years prior to entering law school, Anya received a master’s degree in Global Policy Studies, also from the University of Texas, and wrote a thesis on asymmetric warfare.
Anya spent her childhood in Ukraine and Kyrgyzstan. At 16, she left her family behind and came to America on a university scholarship. Her upbringing motivated her to study law and become an advocate for a strong, independent judiciary.
Anya’s work has been featured in numerous publications, including the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, USA Today, and the Guardian. She is also the host of live recordings of our Short Circuit podcast and a co-producer of our documentary-style podcast Bound by Oath.
*****
A person listed on this page has spoken or otherwise participated in Federalist Society events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on this list does not imply any other endorsement or relationship between the person and the Federalist Society. In most cases, the biographical information on a person's bio page is provided directly by the person, and the Federalist Society does not edit or otherwise endorse that information. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues. All expressions of opinion by a speaker or author are those of the individual.
Qualified Immunity and Remedies for Constitutional Violations: What is the Law and Does It Work?
Utah Lawyer Chapter
Foley and Lardner95 S State St, Suite 2500
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
"Picking the Man and Then Searching the Lawbooks": Probable Cause, Qualified Immunity, and Local Governments Illegally Silencing Critics
Stanford Student Chapter
Stanford Law School559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305
Does One Size Fit All? Qualified Immunity Inside and Outside Split-Second Policing Decisions
Qualified immunity shields all government officials from suit when the constitutional rights they violate are...
Does One Size Fit All? Qualified Immunity Inside and Outside Split-Second Policing Decisions
Qualified immunity shields all government officials from suit when the constitutional rights they violate are...
The Supreme Court’s Three Cheers for Free Speech
The Supreme Court has recently issued rulings in three cases involving speech-based arrests, demonstrating increased...
The Supreme Court’s Three Cheers for Free Speech
The Supreme Court has recently issued rulings in three cases involving speech-based arrests, demonstrating increased...
Courthouse Steps Decision: Gonzalez v. Trevino
In Gonzalez v. Trevino, the plaintiff, Sylvia Gonzalez, argued that her arrest was a retaliatory...