Sep 14 2014 Video Event Videos Panel IV: Passion and Prudence in the Political Process: The Debate Over Federal Civil Rights Policy Robert Barnes, Diana Furchtgott-Roth, Gail L. Heriot, Lara S. Kaufmann Civil Rights in the United States Emotions sometimes run high in the public debates over race and gender issues. Some claim...
Sep 14 2014 Podcast Panel IV: Passion and Prudence in the Political Process: The Debate Over Federal Civil Rights Policy Robert Barnes, Diana Furchtgott-Roth, Gail L. Heriot, Lara S. Kaufmann Civil Rights in the United States Emotions sometimes run high in the public debates over race and gender issues. Some claim...
May 14 2014 Video Event Videos Disparate Impact Analysis Gail L. Heriot, Peter Kirsanow, Adam Liptak, Theodore M. Shaw Second Annual Executive Branch Review Conference Under disparate impact analysis, certain practices might be considered discriminatory if they have a disproportionate...
May 14 2014 Podcast Disparate Impact Analysis Gail L. Heriot, Peter Kirsanow, Adam Liptak, Theodore M. Shaw Second Annual Executive Branch Review Conference Under disparate impact analysis, certain practices might be considered discriminatory if they have a disproportionate...
Mar 20 2014 Podcast Is the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Act in Part Unconstitutional? - Podcast Jennifer Mason McAward, Gail L. Heriot Civil Rights Practice Group Podcast Congress premised the part of the Hate Crimes Prevention Act banning crimes based on race...
Jan 6 2014 Publication Federalist Society Review The Parade of Horribles Lives: Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration, and Immigrant Rights and Fight for Equality By Any Means Necessary Gail L. Heriot Engage Volume 14, Issue 3 October 2013 Note from the Editor: This article is about the U.S. Supreme Court case Schuette v....
Jul 16 2013 Podcast Supreme Court Update: Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin - Podcast Peter Kirsanow, Gail L. Heriot, Dean Reuter Civil Rights Practice Group Podcast The affirmative action case, Fisher v. University of Texas, was decided, 7-1, by the U.S....
Jun 25 2013 Podcast Fisher v. University of Texas - Post-Decision SCOTUScast Gail L. Heriot, Peter Kirsanow SCOTUScast 6-25-13 featuring Gail Heriot and Peter Kirsanow On June 24, 2013 the Supreme Court announced its decision in Fisher v. University of...
Feb 12 2013 Publication Federalist Society Review Sleeping Giant?: Section Two of the Thirteenth Amendment, Hate Crimes Legislation, and Academia’s Favorite New Vehicle for the Expansion of Federal Power Gail L. Heriot, Alison E. Somin Engage Volume 13, Issue 3 October 2012 A brief look at the Thirteenth Amendment might suggest that it has rather limited application...
Nov 19 2012 Video Event Videos Civil Rights: Who Benefits from Affirmative Action and Race and Gender Consciousness? Carlos T. Bea, Martin Castro, Gail L. Heriot, Theodore M. Shaw, Stuart S. Taylor 2012 National Lawyers Convention The Civil Rights Practice Group hosted this panel on "Who Benefits from Affirmative Action and...
Panel IV: Passion and Prudence in the Political Process: The Debate Over Federal Civil Rights Policy
Robert Barnes, Diana Furchtgott-Roth, Gail L. Heriot, Lara S. Kaufmann
Civil Rights in the United States
Emotions sometimes run high in the public debates over race and gender issues. Some claim...
Panel IV: Passion and Prudence in the Political Process: The Debate Over Federal Civil Rights Policy
Robert Barnes, Diana Furchtgott-Roth, Gail L. Heriot, Lara S. Kaufmann
Civil Rights in the United States
Emotions sometimes run high in the public debates over race and gender issues. Some claim...
Disparate Impact Analysis
Gail L. Heriot, Peter Kirsanow, Adam Liptak, Theodore M. Shaw
Second Annual Executive Branch Review Conference
Under disparate impact analysis, certain practices might be considered discriminatory if they have a disproportionate...
Disparate Impact Analysis
Gail L. Heriot, Peter Kirsanow, Adam Liptak, Theodore M. Shaw
Second Annual Executive Branch Review Conference
Under disparate impact analysis, certain practices might be considered discriminatory if they have a disproportionate...
Is the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Act in Part Unconstitutional? - Podcast
Jennifer Mason McAward, Gail L. Heriot
Civil Rights Practice Group Podcast
Congress premised the part of the Hate Crimes Prevention Act banning crimes based on race...
The Parade of Horribles Lives: Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration, and Immigrant Rights and Fight for Equality By Any Means Necessary
Gail L. Heriot
Engage Volume 14, Issue 3 October 2013
Note from the Editor: This article is about the U.S. Supreme Court case Schuette v....
Supreme Court Update: Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin - Podcast
Peter Kirsanow, Gail L. Heriot, Dean Reuter
Civil Rights Practice Group Podcast
The affirmative action case, Fisher v. University of Texas, was decided, 7-1, by the U.S....
Fisher v. University of Texas - Post-Decision SCOTUScast
Gail L. Heriot, Peter Kirsanow
SCOTUScast 6-25-13 featuring Gail Heriot and Peter Kirsanow
On June 24, 2013 the Supreme Court announced its decision in Fisher v. University of...
Sleeping Giant?: Section Two of the Thirteenth Amendment, Hate Crimes Legislation, and Academia’s Favorite New Vehicle for the Expansion of Federal Power
Gail L. Heriot, Alison E. Somin
Engage Volume 13, Issue 3 October 2012
A brief look at the Thirteenth Amendment might suggest that it has rather limited application...
Civil Rights: Who Benefits from Affirmative Action and Race and Gender Consciousness?
Carlos T. Bea, Martin Castro, Gail L. Heriot, Theodore M. Shaw, Stuart S. Taylor
2012 National Lawyers Convention
The Civil Rights Practice Group hosted this panel on "Who Benefits from Affirmative Action and...