Adam Mossoff is Professor of Law at Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason University. He has published extensively on why patents, copyrights, and other intellectual property rights have been—and should be—legally secured to innovators and creators as property rights. His scholarship has been relied on by the United States Supreme Court, by lower federal courts, and by U.S. federal agencies. He has been invited to testify numerous times before the U.S. Senate and the House of Representatives on intellectual property legislation. His writings on intellectual property policy have also appeared in the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Forbes, Investors Business Daily, and in other media outlets. His journal articles can be downloaded here.
Professor Mossoff is a longstanding member of the Executive Committee of the Intellectual Property Practice Group of the Federalist Society, on which he served as Chairperson from 2016-2018, and he is Chair of the Intellectual Property Working Group of the Regulatory Transparency Project of the Federalist Society. He is a Senior Fellow and Chair of the Forum for Intellectual Property at the Hudson Institute, a Visiting Intellectual Property Fellow at the Heritage Foundation, and a member of the Board of Directors of the Center for Intellectual Property Understanding. He is a member of the Intellectual Property Rights Policy Committee of ANSI and he has served as Chair and Vice-Chair of the Intellectual Property Committee of the IEEE-USA, on which he remains a member in good standing.
*****
A person listed as a contributor has spoken or otherwise participated in Federalist Society events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on this list does not imply any other endorsement or relationship between the person and the Federalist Society. In most cases, the biographical information on a person's "contributor" page is provided directly by the person, and the Federalist Society does not edit or otherwise endorse that information. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues. All expressions of opinion by a contributor are those of the contributor.
7 Minute Presentations of Works in Progress Panel 2-B
Westin Washington DC Downtown999 9th St NW
Washington, DC 20001
The EU’s Proposed Regulations of SEP Licensing and Litigation: A Solution or Setback for the Global Innovation Economy?
A Regulatory Transparency Project Webinar
Constitutional Distancing: Unmasking the COVID Pandemic
Pace Student Chapter
Elisabeth Haub School of Law78 North Broadway
White Plains, NY 10603
Feddie Night Fights: Attack of the Clones? On the Legitimacy of Cloning
Feddie Night Fights. It's On!
Zoom WebinarCourthouse Steps Oral Argument: Illumina v. FTC
A Regulatory Transparency Project Webinar
In September, a panel of judges on the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral...
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Illumina v. FTC
A Regulatory Transparency Project Webinar
In September, a panel of judges on the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral...
The EU’s Proposed Regulations of SEP Licensing and Litigation: A Solution or Setback for the Global Innovation Economy?
A Regulatory Transparency Project Webinar
The European Union is considering adopting a wide-ranging regulatory regime for the licensing and litigation...
The EU’s Proposed Regulations of SEP Licensing and Litigation: A Solution or Setback for the Global Innovation Economy?
A Regulatory Transparency Project Webinar
The European Union is considering adopting a wide-ranging regulatory regime for the licensing and litigation...
Should the Government Limit Copyright Protection for E-books?
A Regulatory Transparency Project Fourth Branch Video
In addition to offering physical copies of books, public libraries now offer e-books which can...