Jonathan Urick is senior associate chief counsel at the U.S. Chamber Litigation Center, the litigation arm of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Urick handles a variety of litigation matters for the Chamber.
Urick rejoined the Chamber after helping launch the national litigation boutique Lehotsky Keller LLP, where he represented large corporations and trade associations as one of the firm’s early partners. He previously served as senior counsel for the Chamber Litigation Center, primarily covering arbitration and class-action issues.
Before his first stint at the Chamber, Urick practiced law at McGuireWoods LLP on the firm’s appeals and issues team. With a diverse commercial-litigation practice focused on appeals and dispositive motions, Urick represented a variety of businesses across federal and state courts.
Urick served as a law clerk at all three levels of the federal judiciary: For Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas of the U.S. Supreme Court, Judge Jeffrey Sutton of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, and Judge Amul Thapar, then a judge on the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky.
Urick graduated Order of the Coif from the University of Virginia School of Law, where he served as Articles Development Editor of the Virginia Law Review. He received his undergraduate degree in economics from the University of Delaware.
Topics
Does the Restoring Internet Freedom Order Preempt Conflicting State Laws?
Justice Clarence Thomas’s intriguing discussion of the Supremacy Clause and federal agency preemption in Lipschultz v....
Necessary & Proper Episode 52: Can Congress Enforce their Subpoenas?
William J. Murphy
Can Congress enforce subpoenas they issue? Dr. William Murphy, Founder and President of Good Government...
Topics
The NLRB and Weaponization of Recusal Motions
National Labor Relations Board member William Emmanuel has been under attack almost immediately after and...
Federalist Society Review, Volume 20
Katie McClendon
Federalist Society Review, Volume 20
The Federalist Society Review is the legal journal produced by the Federalist Society for Law...
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Holguin-Hernandez v. U.S.
At issue in the case of Holguin-Hernandez v. United States is whether a formal objection...
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument Teleforum: Hernandez v. Mesa
Peter M. Thomson
Criminal Law & Procedure Practice Group Teleforum
The case of Hernandez v. Mesa arises from a 2010 confrontation on the U.S.-Mexican border in...
Kisor v. Wilkie Makes Auer a Paper Tiger
Karen Harned, Aeron Van Scoyk
Federalist Society Review, Volume 20
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
Credentials Not Required: Why an Employee’s Significant Religious Functions Should Suffice to Trigger the Ministerial Exception
Thomas C. Berg, Erik Money, Nathaniel M. Fouch
Federalist Society Review, Volume 20
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
Topics
Constitutional Vagueness Today
Imagine a criminal statute commanded: “Don’t be a jerk.” Or: “Thou shalt not be unpleasant.” ...
Kansas v. Garcia - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
Jonathan D. Urick
featuring Jonathan Urick
On Oct. 16, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court heard argument in Kansas v. Garcia, a...