Facts of the Case
Ohio's Pilot Project Scholarship Program provides tuition aid in the form of vouchers for certain students in the Cleveland City School District to attend participating public or private schools of their parent's choosing. Both religious and nonreligious schools in the district may participate. Tuition aid is distributed to parents according to financial need, and where the aid is spent depends solely upon where parents choose to enroll their children. In the 1999-2000 school year 82 percent of the participating private schools had a religious affiliation and 96 percent of the students participating in the scholarship program were enrolled in religiously affiliated schools. Sixty percent of the students were from families at or below the poverty line. A group of Ohio taxpayers sought to enjoin the program on the ground that it violated the Establishment Clause. The District Court granted them summary judgment, and the Court of Appeals affirmed.
Questions
Does Ohio's school voucher program violate the Establishment Clause?
Conclusions
-
No. In a 5-4 opinion delivered by Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, the Court held that the program does not violate the Establishment Clause. The Court reasoned that, because Ohio's program is part of Ohio's general undertaking to provide educational opportunities to children, government aid reaches religious institutions only by way of the deliberate choices of numerous individual recipients and the incidental advancement of a religious mission, or any perceived endorsement, is reasonably attributable to the individual aid recipients not the government. Chief Justice Rehnquist wrote that the "Ohio program is entirely neutral with respect to religion. It provides benefits directly to a wide spectrum of individuals, defined only by financial need and residence in a particular school district. It permits such individuals to exercise genuine choice among options public and private, secular and religious. The program is therefore a program of true private choice."
Originalism Carries On
Federalist Society Review, Volume 24
A review of Erwin Chemerinsky, A Momentous Year in the Supreme Court: October Term 2021...
Nine Agencies Propose Regulations for Partnerships with Faith-Based and Neighborhood Organizations
On January 13, 2023, nine agencies issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled “Partnerships...
Religious Schools, Collective Bargaining, & the Constitutional Legacy of NLRB v. Catholic Bishop
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
It would be difficult to find a corner of American labor law more anomalous than...
States have been violating religious schools’ First Amendment rights for decades. The Supreme Court may be about to stop them.
The Supreme Court rarely goes out of its way to make sweeping pronouncements. The Justices...
Why Nineteenth Century Bans on “Sectarian” Aid Are Facially Unconstitutional: New Evidence on Plain Meaning
Federalist Society Review, Volume 19
Note from the Editor: This article presents original research on the nineteenth century meaning of...
Does Part of Workers’ Wages Belong to Their Monopoly Bargaining Agent, Even If They Aren’t Union Members?
On September 28, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in Janus v. American Federation of...
Docket Watch: The Constitutionality of School Choice Tax Credits (Gaddy v. Georgia Department of Revenue)
The Georgia Supreme Court’s unanimous decision in Gaddy v. Georgia Department of Revenue continues the...
The Constitutionality of School Choice Tax Credits (Gaddy v. Georgia Department of Revenue)
The Georgia Supreme Court’s unanimous decision in Gaddy v. Georgia Department of Revenue continues the unbroken record...
When a Pastor’s House Is a Church Home: Why the Parsonage Allowance Is Desirable Under the Establishment Clause
Federalist Society Review, Volume 18
Note from the Editor: This article discusses the parsonage allowance, whereby the value of a...
Religious Liberty after Scalia
Some people opine that Antonin Scalia was not a friend of religious liberty, and that...
Indiana Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of Vouchers for K-12 Education
State Court Docket Watch Article
In a landmark 5-0 decision, Chief Justice Brent Dickson of the Indiana Supreme Court delivered...
Panel One: Are Vouchers and Charter Schools Viable Alternatives to Public Schools?
2013 Annual Western Conference
Parental and community support for school choice has increased dramatically in recent years, with vouchers,...
Does the Establishment Clause Require Broad Restrictions on Religious Expression As Recommended By President Obama’s Faith-Based Advisory Council?
New Federal Initiatives Project
Brought to you by the Religious Liberties Practice GroupThe Federalist Society takes no position on particular...
New York and Maine High Courts Review State Financing of Schools
In the last year, the highest courts in New York and Maine issued important rulings...
The Establishment Clause, Federalism and the States
At the conclusion of its 2001-2002 term, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Zelman...
School Vouchers: Past Lessons and Future Prospects - A Case Study on Constitutionality: Zelman v. Simmons-Harris
MR. AMMEEN: The fortunate timing of this conference is not a coincidence. Knowing that the...
Recent Developments (October 2002) in Civil Rights Law
Supreme Court Upholds School Voucher Program Last term, the United States Supreme Court upheld the...
School Vouchers: Past Lessons and Future Prospects - The Successes of Voucher Programs Thus Far
MR. ENLOW: We are talking about the real world, and it is important to note...
The Grand Finale is Just the Beginning: School Choice and the Coming Battle over Blaine Amendments
The oral arguments in the Cleveland school choice case, Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, held on February...
The Battle Over School Choice: National and Local Perspectives
Alston & Bird LLP Bank of America Plaza 101 S. Tryon StreetCharlotte, North Carolina 28280
Panel One: Are Vouchers and Charter Schools Viable Alternatives to Public Schools?
2013 Annual Western Conference
Ronald Reagan Presidential Library40 Presidential Drive
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Cleveland Program
The City Club of Cleveland 850 Euclid Ave., Second FloorCleveland, Ohio 44115
The Conservative Case for an Activist Judiciary
Goodwin Hotel One Haynes StreetHartford,
Stuart Lark is a partner in the firm's Colorado Springs office. He concentrates on corporate, tax, constitutional and transactional matters for nonprofit organizations. His experience includes joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions, tax exempt financing, corporate structure, IRS rulings, private foundations, unrelated trade or business income tax, property and sales tax, international structure and transactions, planned giving, government funding for religious organizations, faith-based employment rights, immigration, church property disputes and other religious liberty issues. He has published articles and given presentations on many of these issues.