Facts of the Case
An Oklahoma law prohibited persons who were not licensed optometrists or ophthalmologists to fit lenses for eyeglasses. Non-licensed individuals were also prohibited from duplicating optical instruments without written prescriptions from licensed ophthalmologists. The Lee Optical Company challenged the law.
Questions
Did the Oklahoma law violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?
Conclusions
-
In a unanimous decision authored by William Orville Douglas, the Court held that while the law may have been "needless" and "wasteful," it was the duty of the legislature, not the courts, "to balance the advantages and disadvantages of the new requirement." That is, Courts should not be able to invalidate state economic regulations on the grounds that they disagree with the theories supporting them. Even if the state law imposes burdens or waste, the legislature has the sole authority over weighing its benefits against its costs. In sum, the opticians could not prove that the law had no rational relationship to legitimate state objectives.
Does the Original Meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment Protect a Right to Work?
Recent scholarship says yes. At least one federal judge agrees. And soon, we may have an answer from the U.S. Supreme Court.
The story of unenumerated rights is a familiar one. Most law students learn it in...
Does the Original Meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment Protect a Right to Work?
Recent scholarship says yes. At least one federal judge agrees. And soon, we may have an answer from the U.S. Supreme Court.
The story of unenumerated rights is a familiar one. Most law students learn it in...
Protecting Economic Liberty in the Federal Courts: Theory, Precedent, Practice
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
The 14th Amendment meaningfully protects economic liberty. While this protection was originally housed in the...
Protecting Economic Liberty in the Federal Courts: Theory, Precedent, Practice
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
The 14th Amendment meaningfully protects economic liberty. While this protection was originally housed in the...
Which Rights Are We Mediating?
Federalist Society Review, Volume 21
A review of How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights Is Tearing America...
Which Rights Are We Mediating?
Federalist Society Review, Volume 21
A review of How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights Is Tearing America...
Differing Levels of Scrutiny for Economic Regulations: "Anything Goes" Rational Basis v. Rational Basis "With Bite"
Recently, the South Carolina Supreme Court issued a decision striking down a state law that...
Differing Levels of Scrutiny for Economic Regulations: "Anything Goes" Rational Basis v. Rational Basis "With Bite"
Recently, the South Carolina Supreme Court issued a decision striking down a state law that...
Lions Under the Bureaucracy: Defending Judicial Deference to the Administrative State
Federalist Society Review, Volume 18
A Review of: Law’s Abnegation: From Law’s Empire to the Administrative State, by Adrian Vermeule ...
The Circuit Splits Are Out There—and the Court Should Resolve Them
Engage Volume 16, Issue 2
Note from the Editor: This article argues that the U.S. Supreme Court should resolve a...
