Facts of the Case
Chantell and Mike Sackett own a half-acre lot in a residential area near Priest Lake, Idaho. In April and May of 2007, the Sacketts filled in about one-half acre of that property with dirt and rock in preparation for building a house. On November 26, 2007, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency issued a compliance order against the Sacketts. The compliance order alleged that the parcel is a wetland subject to the Clean Water Act and that the Sacketts violated the CWA by filling in their property without first obtaining a permit. The order required the Sacketts to remove the fill material and restore the parcel to its original condition.
The Sacketts sought a hearing with the EPA to challenge the finding that the Parcel is subject to the CWA. The EPA did not grant the Sacketts a hearing and continued to assert CWA jurisdiction over the parcel. The Sacketts filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho seeking injunctive and declaratory relief. They challenged the compliance order as (1) arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act; (2) issued without a hearing in violation of the Sacketts' procedural due process rights; and (3) issued on the basis of an "any information available" standard that is unconstitutionally vague. The district court granted the EPA's motion to dismiss, finding that the CWA precludes judicial review of compliance orders before EPA has started an enforcement action in federal court. On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the lower court order.
Questions
Do landowners have a right to go to court to challenge a Clean Water Act order of the Environmental Protection Agency?
Conclusions
-
Yes. In a 9-0 decision, Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the majority opinion holding that the EPA's compliance order is a final agency action, and there is no other remedy for the Sackett's other than judicial review. Justice Scalia rejected each of the government's arguments that the Clean Water Act precluded judicial review of compliance orders. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote a concurrence, noting that the Court ruled only on whether the Sackett's can seek review of the EPA's authority to regulate their land, not whether they can challenge the specific terms of the compliance order. Justice Samuel A. Alito also concurred, stating that judicial review of compliance is better than nothing, but the only real solution is a clarification by Congress of the ambiguities in the Clean Water Act .
Florida and EPA Defend Clean Water Act Permit Program in the D.C. Circuit
In its report last month on The Biggest Enviro Cases To Watch In 2024, Law360 identified...
Ambiguity in the Law and San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency
If there is one thing a bureaucracy loves more than power, it’s ambiguity in the...
Corner Post and 28 U.S.C. § 2401(a): Not Much to Look At?
Federalist Society Review, Volume 25
This term the U.S. Supreme Court will decide Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors...
Breakout Panel 5 - Environmental Law and the Constitution: Exceeding the Limits
ERBXII
In his Sackett v. EPA concurrence, Justice Thomas suggested that "many environmental regulatory schemes” appear...
The Myth of Mass Incarceration Remains Strong—Despite All Evidence to the Contrary
Federalist Society Review, Volume 25
A review of Jeffrey Bellin, Mass Incarceration Nation: How the United States Became Addicted to...
Environmental Law Visits Bedford Falls at the National Lawyers Convention
It’s almost that time of year when TV channel-flippers (like me) invariably stumble across “It’s...
[Film Screening & Discussion] Sackett v. EPA: A Tale of Wetland Regulations
A Regulatory Transparency Project Event
Join the Federalist Society and the American Conservation Coalition for a film screening and discussion...
The Northwest Ordinance: Historically Significant, Still Relevant
Happy birthday to the Northwest Ordinance, which the Articles of Confederation Congress enacted on July...
Tyler v. Hennepin County: Why This Seemingly Innocent Decision is Disquieting
A Supreme Court ruling, like many other things, may not be quite what it seems....
Supreme Court Rules Against EPA’s Claims of Expansive Wetland Authority
On May 25, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Sackett v. EPA, a...
Major Unanimous Supreme Court Victory for Property Rights in Tyler v. Hennepin County
This post was originally published at the Volokh Conspiracy. [Thursday] morning, the Supreme Court issued...
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Army Corps of Engineers revise Clean Water Act regulations defining “navigable waters” for the fourth time in seven years
On January 18, 2023, U.S. EPA and the Army Corps published new regulations in the...
Clean Water Act – Forward to the Past?
The federal Clean Water Act regulates discharges to “navigable waters,” which the Act defines as...
Clean Water Act – Forward to the Past?
The federal Clean Water Act regulates discharges to “navigable waters,” which the Act defines as...
Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
Tony Francois, Matthew Z. Leopold, Damien Schiff, William Snape
One of the longest-standing environmental law challenges is how to define the scope of waters...
Deep Dive Episode 240 - Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency
Regulatory Transparency Project's Fourth Branch Podcast
One of the longest-standing environmental law challenges is how to define the scope of waters...
The Latest Energy and Environmental Regulations
As usual, there are many energy and environmental regulatory developments across the federal government. This...
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency
One of the longest-standing environmental law challenges is how to define the scope of waters...
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency
One of the longest-standing environmental law challenges is how to define the scope of waters...
Sackett v. EPA: How Will the U.S. Supreme Court Define "Waters of the United States?"
A Regulatory Transparency Project Webinar
One of the most controversial and long-standing environmental issues deals with what waters are regulated...
A Seat at the Sitting - October 2022
The October Docket in 90 Minutes or Less
Each month, a panel of constitutional experts convenes to discuss the Court’s upcoming docket sitting...
A Seat at the Sitting - October 2022
The October Docket in 90 Minutes or Less
Each month, a panel of constitutional experts convenes to discuss the Court’s upcoming docket sitting...
After Fifty Years of Clean Water Act Confusion, the Supreme Court Should, in Sackett v. EPA, Finally Apply a Reasonable Standard to Federal Government Regulation
The first case of the Supreme Court’s October 2022 term is Sackett v. EPA, No....
Is Our Modern Administrative State Unmoored from the Morality of Law?
Federalist Society Review, Volume 21
A review of The Dubious Morality of Modern Administrative Law, by Richard A. Epstein (Manhattan Institute...
Will We Soon Have Clarity on Navigable Waters?: How the Supreme Court’s October 2017 Term Set the Stage
Federalist Society Review, Volume 19
Note from the Editor: This article discusses the longstanding legal battle over the meaning of...
A Shy Frog, the Administrative State, and Judicial Review of Agency Decision-Making: A Preview of Weyerhaeuser v. United States Fish & Wildlife Service
Federalist Society Review, Volume 19
Note from the Editor: This article previews one of the first cases of the Supreme...
Towards an Administrative Rule of Lenity: Restoring the Constitutional Congress by Reforming Statutory Interpretation
Federalist Society Review, Volume 19
Note from the Editor: In this article, Joel Nolette proposes an “administrative rule of lenity”...
Lions Under the Bureaucracy: Defending Judicial Deference to the Administrative State
Federalist Society Review, Volume 18
A Review of: Law’s Abnegation: From Law’s Empire to the Administrative State, by Adrian Vermeule ...
Final Agency Actions and Judicial Review: United States Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co.
Federalist Society Review, Volume 17, Issue 3
Note from the Editor: This article discusses the Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States Army...
Administrative agencies can't just "mak[e] it up as [they] go along."
In late May, Judge James Boasberg of the U.S. Court for the District of Columbia...
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co.
Unreviewable Authority Breeds Extravagant Claims of Clean Water Act Jurisdiction
Background Imagine you own a plot of land. You may want to build a house...
Can the Environmental Protection Agency Stop the Pebble Mine?
Engage Volume 14, Issue 2 July 2013
Note from the Editor: This article discusses whether the Environmental Protection Agency has the authority...
The Reach of Agency Authority: Sackett v. EPA - Podcast
Environmental Law & Property Rights Practice Group Podcast
On March 21, 2012, the unanimous Supreme Court handed down its decision in Sackett v....
Engage Volume 13, Issue 2, July 2012
The Journal of the Federalist Society Practice Groups
*Online-Only Issue* ADMINISTRATIVE LAW & REGULATION Gmail.gov: When Politics Gets Personal, Does the Public Have...
Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency: Compliance Orders and the Right of Judicial Review
Engage Volume 13, Issue 2, July 2012
The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency1 promises to be important...
EPA and U.S. Army Corps Seek to Expand Jurisdiction Under the Clean Water Act
Engage Volume 13, Issue 1, March 2012
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) (jointly, the...
Sackett v. EPA - Post-Decision SCOTUScast
SCOTUScast 03-27-12 featuring Elizabeth Papez
On March 21, 2012, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Sackett v. EPA. This case...
Sackett v. EPA: When May a Landowner Take the EPA to Court? - Podcast
Environmental Law & Property Rights Practice Group Podcast
To listen, please right click on the audio file you wish to hear and then...
Sackett v. EPA - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
SCOTUScast 01-25-12 featuring Elizabeth Papez
On January 9, 2012, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Sackett v. EPA. This...
Supreme Court Preview: What Is in Store for October Term 2011?
October 3rd marks the first day of the 2011 Supreme Court term. This term the...
Supreme Court Preview: What Is in Store for October Term 2011?
October 3rd marks the first day of the 2011 Supreme Court term. This term the...