Facts of the Case
Respondents, who are nonresident enemy aliens, were captured in China by the United States Army and tried and convicted in China by an American military commission for violations of the laws of war committed in China prior to their capture. They were transported to the American-occupied part of Germany and imprisoned there in the custody of the Army. At no time were they within the territorial jurisdiction of any American civil court. Claiming that their trial, conviction, and imprisonment violated Articles I and III, the Fifth Amendment, and other provisions of our Constitution, laws of the United States, and provisions of the Geneva Convention, they petitioned the District Court for the District of Columbia for a writ of habeas corpus directed to the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of the Army, and several officers of the Army having directive power over their custodian.
Conclusions
-
1. A nonresident enemy alien has no access to our courts in wartime. Pp. 339 U. S. 768 -777.
Separation of Powers and Prisoner Execution in Texas
On November 15, 2024, the Texas Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in In re...
OLC Memos
Online Debate
On April 16, President Obama announced that he was declassifying and releasing to the public...
Boumediene v. Bush
Online Debate
Boumediene v. Bush arises on a writ of habeas corpus filed on behalf of Lakmar...
Al-Marri: Al-Qaeda Prisoner Dentention Case
Online Debate
On June 11, 2007, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals decided the case of al-Marri v. Wright....
The War on Terrorism: Law Enforcement or National Security?
George Terwilliger*Theodore Cooperstein**Shawn Gunnarson***Daniel Blumenthal****Robert Parker***** The horrific events of September 11th were immediately labeled...