Facts of the Case
In 1993, the South Boston Allied War Veterans Council was authorized by the city of Boston to organize the St. Patrick's Day Parade. The Council refused a place in the event for the Irish American Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Group of Boston (GLIB). The group attempted to join to express its members' pride in their Irish heritage as openly gay, lesbian, and bisexual individuals. The Massachusetts State Court ordered the Veterans' Council to include GLIB under a state law prohibiting discrimination on account of sexual orientation in public accommodations. The Veterans' Council claimed that forced inclusion of GLIB members in their privately-organized parade violated their free speech.
Questions
Did a Massachusetts State Court's mandate to Boston's Veterans' Council, requiring it to include GLIB members in its parade, violate the Council's free speech rights as protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments?
Conclusions
-
Yes. A unanimous court held that the State Court's ruling to require private citizens who organize a parade to include a group expressing a message that the organizers do not wish to convey violates the First Amendment by making private speech subordinate to the public accommodation requirement. Such an action "violate[s] the fundamental First Amendment rule that a speaker has the autonomy to choose the content of his own message and, conversely, to decide what not to say."
The First Amendment is Again in Colorado’s Crosshairs
No one doubts that the State of Colorado has an interest in protecting its citizens’...
Litigation Update: S.E. v. Grey
Encinitas Unified School District required two fifth-grade boys and their assigned kindergarten buddies to read...
Religious Liberty and the Court - Looking Ahead to the Next Term
For the past few Supreme Court terms we have hosted Mark Rienzi, President of the...
Net Choices: Social Media, Content Moderation, and the First Amendment
In 2021, both Florida and Texas enacted legislation to limit how social media platforms could...
2023 Annual Supreme Court Round Up
Registration is now closed. We will not be accepting walk-ins or on-site registration for this...
Courthouse Steps Decision: 303 Creative v. Elenis
On June 30, 2023 U.S. Supreme Court decided 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis. Petitioner Lorie...
Measuring and Evaluating Public Responses to Religious Rights Rulings
Federalist Society Review, Volume 23
The story of Jack Phillips and his cake shop—Masterpiece Cakeshop—is by now familiar. Jack Phillips...
Litigation Update: Meriwether v. Hartop
In a decision issued on March 26, 2021, the Sixth Circuit held Professor Nicholas Meriwether,...
Courthouse Steps Decision: USAID v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc.
On Monday, the Supreme Court released its decision in United States Agency for International Development...
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: USAID v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc.
On May 5, 2020, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in an important First Amendment...
Compelled Speech or Public Accommodation?
On September 16, 2019, the Arizona Supreme Court issued a 4-3 decision in Brush &...
Courthouse Steps: Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado CRC
Religious Liberties Practice Group Teleforum
On December 5th, The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado...
