Facts of the Case
In 1997, Barbara Grutter, a white resident of Michigan, applied for admission to the University of Michigan Law School. Grutter applied with a 3.8 undergraduate GPA and an LSAT score of 161. She was denied admission. The Law School admits that it uses race as a factor in making admissions decisions because it serves a "compelling interest in achieving diversity among its student body." The District Court concluded that the Law School's stated interest in achieving diversity in the student body was not a compelling one and enjoined its use of race in the admissions process. In reversing, the Court of Appeals held that Justice Powell's opinion in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978), constituted a binding precedent establishing diversity as a compelling governmental interest sufficient under strict scrutiny review to justify the use of racial preferences in admissions. The appellate court also rejected the district court's finding that the Law School's "critical mass" was the functional equivalent of a quota.
Questions
Does the University of Michigan Law School's use of racial preferences in student admissions violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment or Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964?
Conclusions
-
No. In a 5-4 opinion delivered by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, the Court held that the Equal Protection Clause does not prohibit the Law School's narrowly tailored use of race in admissions decisions to further a compelling interest in obtaining the educational benefits that flow from a diverse student body. The Court reasoned that, because the Law School conducts highly individualized review of each applicant, no acceptance or rejection is based automatically on a variable such as race and that this process ensures that all factors that may contribute to diversity are meaningfully considered alongside race. Justice O'Connor wrote, "in the context of its individualized inquiry into the possible diversity contributions of all applicants, the Law School's race-conscious admissions program does not unduly harm nonminority applicants."
The Twin Commands: Streamlining Equality Litigation Based on Students for Fair Admissions
Federalist Society Review, Volume 25
Each year, government contracting programs dole out tens of billions of dollars to businesses that...
Hispanic-Serving Institutions and Emerging Constitutional Issues
Federalist Society Review, Volume 24
In 2019, Florida Gulf Coast University’s (FGCU) “Florida Educational Equity Report” noted that FGCU “continues...
California’s Reparations Plan Founders on the Shoals of Law
No state has more aggressively advanced identitarian essentialism than California. In 2018, California passed a...
California’s Reparations Plan Founders on the Shoals of Law
No state has more aggressively advanced identitarian essentialism than California. In 2018, California passed a...
"The Diversity Lie" 20 Years Later
In 2003, Professor Brian Fitzpatrick published a piece titled "The Diversity Lie" in which he...
"The Diversity Lie" 20 Years Later
In 2003, Professor Brian Fitzpatrick published a piece titled "The Diversity Lie" in which he...
The ABA is Stretching the Limits of Law with Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Rule
The ABA recently put forth a newly revised Standard 206 on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion....
Litigation Update: Cert Granted in Students for Fair Admission v. Harvard and Students for Fair Admission v. UNC Chapel Hill
Breaking news: The Supreme Court granted certiorari in two petitions pending before the Supreme Court...
An Academic Freedom Exception to Government Control of Employee Speech
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
Public employee speech cases often arise as Section 1983 actions in which a public employee...
Legal Scholars Castigate the American Bar Association’s Proposed Diversity Standards
Several prominent legal scholars have recently weighed in against the American Bar Association’s pending proposal...
Should the Supreme Court Take Note of “Th’ Iliction Returns” Next Time It Addresses Race-Preferential Admissions Policies?
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
“[N]o matter whether th’ constitution follows th’ flag or not, th’ Supreme Court follows th’...
Real Harms from Racial Discrimination in Harvard Admissions
“If you are an Asian American — or even if you simply have an Asian...
Solicitor General Francisco Attempts to Fast-Track DACA Litigation to SCOTUS
U.S. Solicitor General Noel Francisco petitioned the Supreme Court on Monday to grant certiorari before...
Solicitor General Francisco Attempts to Fast-Track DACA Litigation to SCOTUS
U.S. Solicitor General Noel Francisco petitioned the Supreme Court on Monday to grant certiorari before...
Affirmative Action Confusion at the College of Charleston
Fast Action! On July 29, 2018, the Charleston Post and Courier ran a story entitled Affirmative...
Trump Administration Withdraws Guidance on Affirmative Action In Admissions
On Wednesday, July 3, the Departments of Education and Justice announced that they withdrew a...
Law Firm Preferences - Podcast
Major American corporations are pressuring their outside law firms to meet diversity goals both firm-wide and...
Fisher v. UT–Austin and the Future of Racial Preferences in College Admissions
Federalist Society Review, Volume 17, Issue 2
Note from the Editor: This article discusses the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Fisher v. University...
Fisher v. UT–Austin and the Future of Racial Preferences in College Admissions
Federalist Society Review, Volume 17, Issue 2
Note from the Editor: This article discusses the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Fisher v. University...
"Affirmative Action Gone Wild?": Supreme Court Upholds Race Preferences in Fisher v. University of Texas II
I like to think I am unusually gifted at political prognostication because, in 2004, I...
Most Popular Blog Posts of 2015
As a new year fast approaches, let's take a moment to look back at some...
Fisher II, Academic Mismatch, and the Constitution: A Legal Issue, or Just a Policy One?
Following Justice Scalia's controversial question about mismatch research at the Fisher v. Texas oral argument, some commentators have...
Fisher II, Academic Mismatch, and the Constitution: A Legal Issue, or Just a Policy One?
Following Justice Scalia's controversial question about mismatch research at the Fisher v. Texas oral argument, some...
On Heightening the Contradictions of Grutter v. Bollinger: Thoughts on the Fisher v. UT Oral Argument
Yesterday, Justice Scalia's controversial question about mismatch theory at the Fisher v. UT oral argument...
A Conflict of Principles: The Battle Over Affirmative Action at the University of Michigan
Engage Volume 16, Issue 3
Carl Cohen's book, A Conflict of Principles: The Battle Over Affirmative Action at the University of...
A Conflict of Principles: The Battle Over Affirmative Action at the University of Michigan
Engage Volume 16, Issue 3
Note from the Editor: This book review discusses the contentious issue of affirmative action. The Federalist...
A Conflict of Principles: The Battle Over Affirmative Action at the University of Michigan
Engage Volume 16, Issue 3
Note from the Editor: This book review discusses the contentious issue of affirmative action. The Federalist...
Accreditation Overreach Part 2
Forcing Affirmative Action on Colleges and Universities
In my last blog post, I drew attention to my Wall Street Journal op-ed, "Why...
Accreditation Overreach Part 2
Forcing Affirmative Action on Colleges and Universities
In my last blog post, I drew attention to my Wall Street Journal op-ed, "Why...
Supreme Court Preview: Fisher
An "Honest" Affirmative Action Defense?
In the long running case of Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, insufficient notice...
Supreme Court Preview: Fisher
An "Honest" Affirmative Action Defense?
In the long running case of Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, insufficient notice...
Civil Forfeiture: 3 Recent Cases (Part 2)
A continuation of our recent blog post on civil forfeiture: United States v. Coffman, 2015...
Supreme Court Preview: Of Fisher II and Paper Tigers
“There are not many dull moments in the debate about race preferences in university admissions....
Supreme Court Preview: Fisher II
Holistic Review Is a Sham
Two years ago, the Supreme Court’s 7-1 ruling in Fisher v. UT-Austin (Fisher I) made clear that...
Anecdotes as Evidence: Proving Public Contracting Discrimination in a Strict Scrutiny World
Engage Volume 16, Issue 2
Note from the Editor: This article is about the use of anecdotal evidence to justify...
Anecdotes as Evidence: Proving Public Contracting Discrimination in a Strict Scrutiny World
Engage Volume 16, Issue 2
Note from the Editor: This article is about the use of anecdotal evidence to justify...
"A Dubious Expediency: How Racial Preferential Admissions on Campus Hurt Minority Students"
"We expect that 25 years from now, the use of racial preferences will no longer...
A Lady or a Tiger?: Thoughts on Fisher v. University of Texas and the Future of Race Preferences in America
Engage Volume 14, Issue 3 October 2013
Note from the Editor: This article is about the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Fisher...
A Lady or a Tiger?: Thoughts on Fisher v. University of Texas and the Future of Race Preferences in America
Engage Volume 14, Issue 3 October 2013
Note from the Editor: This article is about the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Fisher...
The Parade of Horribles Lives: Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration, and Immigrant Rights and Fight for Equality By Any Means Necessary
Engage Volume 14, Issue 3 October 2013
Note from the Editor: This article is about the U.S. Supreme Court case Schuette v....
The Parade of Horribles Lives: Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration, and Immigrant Rights and Fight for Equality By Any Means Necessary
Engage Volume 14, Issue 3 October 2013
Note from the Editor: This article is about the U.S. Supreme Court case Schuette v....
Executive Order 13583: Establishing a Coordinated Government-Wide Initiative to Promote Diversity
Engage Volume 14, Issue 2 July 2013
Note from the Editor: This article is about Executive Order (EO) 13583—Establishing a Coordinated Government-Wide...
Book Reviews: Mismatch and Wounds That Will Not Heal
Engage Volume 14, Issue 1 February 2013
Note from the Editor: This feature reviews two new books on affirmative action in anticipation...
Fisher v. University of Texas: Affirmative Action Revisited by the Supreme Court - Podcast
Civil Rights Practice Group Podcast
Fisher v. University of Texas is being heralded as the blockbuster case of this year’s...
The Fisher Case: Mismatch & the Future of Affirmative Action - Podcast
Civil Rights Practice Group Podcast
To listen, please right click on the audio file you wish to hear and then...
Perry v. Schwarzenegger: Is Traditional Marriage Unconstitutional?
Engage Volume 12, Issue 3, November 2011
Note from the Editor: This article and the article in this issue by Mark Strasser...
Affirmative Action for Men? Strange Silences and Strange Bedfellows in the Public Debate over Discrimination Against Women in College Admissions
Engage Volume 12, Issue 3, November 2011
While some news reports indicate that discrimination against women on the basis of sex1 in...
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin: Could the Supreme Court Revisit Its Decision in Grutter?
Engage Volume 12, Issue 2, September 2011
In Grutter v. Bollinger, the Supreme Court held that achieving the educational benefits that flow...
Engage Volume 12, Issue 2, September 2011
The Journal of the Federalist Society Practice Groups
*Online-Only Issue* Special Edition: Templeton Debates The Constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act...
Barwatch Bulletin for February 9, 2008
February 9, 2008
ABA President Bill Neukom Press Conference ABA President Bill Neukom hosted a press conference on...
Barwatch Bulletin for February 9, 2008
February 9, 2008
ABA President Bill Neukom Press Conference ABA President Bill Neukom hosted a press conference on...
Super-Tuesday for Equal Rights
When the Gratz and Grutter opinions were released in 2003, many believed that eliminating race...
Panel II: Kelo, Grutter, and Popular Responses to Unpopular Decisions
2008 National Student Symposium
The Federalist Society's Student Division presented this panel at the 2008 Annual Student Symposium on...
Panel II: Kelo, Grutter, and Popular Responses to Unpopular Decisions
2008 National Student Symposium
The Federalist Society's Student Division presented this panel at the 2008 Annual Student Symposium on...
SCOTUS term
Online Debate
On June 28, 2007, the Supreme Court handed down its last decisions of the Spring...
Sordid Business: The Supreme Court Confronts the Constitutionality of Racial Preferences in K-12 Education
It is a sordid business, this divvying us up by race.—Chief Justice Roberts
The Chief Justice’s words, written in the context of a congressional redistricting case, are equally...
Sordid Business: The Supreme Court Confronts the Constitutionality of Racial Preferences in K-12 Education
It is a sordid business, this divvying us up by race.—Chief Justice Roberts The...
Sordid Business: The Supreme Court Confronts the Constitutionality of Racial Preferences in K-12 Education
It is a sordid business, this divvying us up by race.—Chief Justice Roberts The...
Bar Watch Bulletin August 8, 2006
Recommendations Considered by the House of Delegates, Karen Mendis Press Conference, Michael Greco's Farewell, Special Panel: Liberty vs. Security
The American Bar Association's Annual Meeting takes place in Honolulu from Thursday, August 3 to...
Bar Watch Bulletin July 2006
Preview of Annual Meeting
The American Bar Association Midyear Meetings take place from Thursday, August 3 until Tuesday, August...
Bar Watch Bulletin February 13, 2006
Legal Education, Health Care, Lobbying
The ABA's Council of the Section on Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar voted...
2003 Barbara K. Olson Memorial Lecture - Transcript
Address by Robert H. Bork, Senior Fellow, American Enterprise Instituteand Co-Chairman, Federalist Society Board of...
A Roadmap for the Continuing Legal Challenge to Race-Based Admissions
The higher education establishment breathed a sigh of relief in June when the Supreme Court’s...
