Tara Leigh Grove is the Vinson & Elkins Chair in Law at the University of Texas School of Law. Grove graduated summa cum laude from Duke University and magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, where she served as the Supreme Court Chair of the Harvard Law Review. Grove clerked for Judge Emilio Garza on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and then spent four years as an attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, where she argued fifteen cases in the courts of appeals.
Grove’s research focuses on the federal judiciary, interpretive theory, and the constitutional separation of powers. She has published with such prestigious law journals as the Harvard Law Review, the Yale Law Journal, the Columbia Law Review, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, the New York University Law Review, the University of Chicago Law Review, the Virginia Law Review, the Texas Law Review, the Cornell Law Review, the Northwestern University Law Review, and the Vanderbilt Law Review. Grove has received awards for both her research and her teaching.
In 2021, Grove served on the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, a bipartisan commission created by President Biden and charged with examining proposals for Supreme Court reform. Since 2022, Grove has worked on the Princeton Initiative on Reclaiming the Constitutional Powers of Congress, which brings together former members of Congress, political scientists, and law professors. Grove serves as the Co-Chair of the section on the Appointments Process for the Princeton Initiative. Grove is a co-author of Low & Jeffries' Federal Courts and the Law of Federal-State Relations, a leading federal courts casebook, and she has served as the Chair of the Federal Courts Section of the Association of American Law Schools. Grove has been a visiting professor at both Harvard Law School and Northwestern Pritzker School of Law.
Reasoned Argument Book Club: The Declaration of Independence [Session 2]
The Declaration of Independence: How much of the Declaration is still largely believed?
Reasoned Argument Book Club: The Declaration of Independence [Session 2]
John S. Baker
REASONED ARGUMENT: THE COUNTER TO CANCEL CULTURE American Argument Prior to, During, and Following theFederalist-Antifederalist...
Reasoned Argument Book Club: Introduction [Session 1]
Do we live in a Democracy, a Republic, or a blended Democratic Republic?
Reasoned Argument Book Club: Introduction [Session 1]
John S. Baker
Session 1 Readings:Our Republican Constitution, pp. 18-28.Novus Ordo Seclorum, pp. 1-8. REASONED ARGUMENT: THE COUNTER...
Topics
Book Review: A Dubious Expediency: How Race Preferences Damage Higher Education
A Dubious Expediency: How Race Preferences Damage Higher Education, edited by Gail Heriot & Maimon...
Frederick Douglass: Critical Race Theorist?
Milwaukee Lawyers Chapter
State Court Docket Watch: 2020 Edition
In an effort to increase dialogue about state court jurisprudence, the Federalist Society presents State...
7 Minute Presentations of Works in Progress Panel 1-B
23rd Annual Federalist Society Faculty Conference
The Antitrust "Failing Firm” Defense in the Wake of the COVID-19 Crisis
Greg Eastman, Eric Grannon, George L. Paul
Since 1930, the Supreme Court has recognized a failing firm defense to an otherwise unlawful...
The Antitrust "Failing Firm” Defense in the Wake of the COVID-19 Crisis
Corporations, Antitrust, & Securities Practice Group Teleforum
Teleforum