Senior Attorney, Pacific Legal Foundation
Damien Schiff is a senior attorney at Pacific Legal Foundation. He leads its environmental practice group, a unique initiative that draws broadly from PLF’s expertise and success in property rights and separation of powers litigation. Over the years, Damien has represented hundreds of landowners and property rights advocates to defend their liberties against heavy-handed and unwarranted environmental and land-use regulation. His litigation experience includes Sackett v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, a groundbreaking decision in which the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the right of landowners to challenge Clean Water Act compliance orders issued by EPA, and Contoski v. Norton, PLF’s successful effort to force the federal government to make good on its promise to delist the bald eagle from the Endangered Species Act.
Besides litigation, Damien has written academic articles on a variety of subjects, including the Endangered Species Act, the Clean Water Act, greenhouse gas torts, the duty to rescue, and international water law. He has appeared on a variety of television and radio programs and has been quoted in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Harper’s Magazine, and The Economist, among other publications.
He obtained his law degree magna cum laude from the University of San Diego School of Law, and his undergraduate degree magna cum laude from Georgetown University. While at USD, he was a research assistant for Professor Bernard Siegan, a leading constitutional theorist and advocate for property rights and economic liberty. Immediately prior to joining PLF, Damien clerked for Judge (and former PLF attorney) Victor Wolski of the United States Court of Federal Claims. Damien credits the mentoring and examples of Professor Siegan and Judge Wolski for his decision to pursue a career in liberty-based public interest litigation.
Damien lives in Sacramento with his wife, two young sons, four chickens, and a cat named Princess. In his off hours he enjoys stamp collecting, Gregorian chant, and martinis—preferably at the same time.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co., Inc.: Wetlands Jurisdictional Determinations and the Right of Federal Judicial Review
Damien Michael Schiff
Federalist Society Review, Volume 17, Issue 1
Note from the Editor: This article discusses U.S. Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes, a...
Topics
CFPB Report
On February 8, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) wrote to the CFPB to describe the...
Topics
The FCC's Flawed Understanding of Competition
That the Federal Communications Commission has been on a pronounced regulatory binge over the last...
Topics
Members of Congress File Amicus Brief in Opposition to EPA's Clean Power Plan
On February 23, 2016, the Chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, Sen....
Topics
ED Texas Patent Docket Facing Headwinds
In 2015, patent holders filed 2523 suits in the Eastern District of Texas, according to data...
Topics
SCOTUS Orders and Opinions: 3/7/2016
Today the Court issued 3 opinions and a new Order List, summarized below: OPINIONS Two...
Topics
2016 James Kent Summer Academy
The Federalist Society's Faculty Division is accepting applications for the 2016 James Kent Summer Academy, which...
Topics
Justice Scalia and the Proper Role of a Judge
With the passing of Justice Antonin Scalia, many Americans have begun to ask: What is...
Topics
Enough Is Enough: Justice Scalia, Auer Deference, and Judicial Duty
It is one of the most fundamental principles of Anglo-American law: No person may be...
Topics
Written Briefs and the Spoken Word at SCOTUS
Anyone who follows the actual work product of the Supreme Court knows that oral argument...