The National Popular Vote Plan
Federalism & Separation of Powers and Free Speech & Election Law Practice Groups Teleforum
When Alexander Hamilton spoke of the Electoral College, he said: “[If] the manner of it be not perfect, it is at least excellent.” Today, some are more doubtful, to say the least. The New York Times editorial board calls the system a “quadrennial ritual born in the economics and politics of slavery and the quill-pen era.” Some Americans want to move to a direct national election so badly that they have created an effort to do exactly that, but without a constitutional amendment. The National Popular Vote effort asks state legislatures to award their electors to the winner of the national popular vote. If states holding a majority of electors comply, then the presidential election will operate as a national direct election. This panel will discuss presidential election from several perspectives: Is the Electoral College an antiquated institution or is it an essential element of America’s republican democracy? If the Electoral College needs to be replaced with a direct election system, is NPV an appropriate route to change? Or does its interstate compact constitute an end-run around the constitutional amendment process?
Featuring:
- Prof. George C. Edwards III, University Distinguished Professor of Political Science, Texas A&M University
- Mr. Trent England, Vice President of Policy, The Freedom Foundation
- Dr. John R. Koza, Author, Every Vote Equal: A State-Based Plan for Electing the President by National Popular Vote
- Ms. Tara Ross, Author, Enlightened Democracy: The Case for the Electoral College
Call begins at 12:00 noon Eastern Time.
Teleforum calls are open to all dues paying members of the Federalist Society. To become a member, sign up here. As a member, you should receive email announcements of upcoming Teleforum calls which contain the conference call phone number. If you are not receiving those email announcements, please contact us at 202-822-8138.