65 W Jackson Blvd
Chicago, IL 60604
THIS EVENT IS SOLD OUT
Friday, May 19, 2023
Union League Club
65 W Jackson Blvd
Chicago, IL 60604
The Federalist Society has launched its In-House Counsel Network to provide a place for balanced discussion of the most pressing legal issues facing the business community. We are very pleased to present this second annual day-long national conference. It will be held on Friday, May 19 at Chicago's Union League Club.
5 hours (300 minutes) of
Continuing Legal Education (CLE)
credits available.
This conference is off the record
Featuring Address from:
Hon. Michael B. Mukasey
Former Attorney General of the United States
Other Speakers Confirmed to Date
James Burnham, Partner, Jones Day
Hon. Paul Clement, Partner, Clement & Murphy PLLC
Justin Danhof, Head of Corporate Governance at Strive Asset Management
David Morrell, Partner, Jones Day
Hon. Hester M. Peirce, Commissioner, United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Hon. Eugene Scalia, Partner, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, and Former United States Secretary of Labor
Kate Todd, Partner, Ellis George Cipollone O'Brien Annaguey LLP
CLE and Pricing
All-inclusive general registration tickets: $350
Includes lunch, CLE credit, day-long attendance, and banquet seat
Sponsors
Platinum
Gold
Silver
Bronze
Supporter
Mr. David L. Cavicke, Chicago, Illinois
Recommended lodging for attendees:
Palmer House
JW Marriott
Kimpton Gray
W Chicago City Center
Please Contact Ryan Lacey at [email protected] with any questions.
Back to topThe U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and several states are contemplating, or have passed, sweeping disclosure requirements related to Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) standards. These standards, as proposed, will require companies to disclose information that the SEC has linked to climate change, and about things like environmental practices. Were existing, voluntary company disclosures enough without regulation? What impact do these rules have on companies? Do ESG regulations assist with comparability, or does the nature of ESG disclosure make that goal unattainable? With the rise of the major questions doctrine, see West Virginia v. EPA, how will these regulations withstand legal scrutiny? Will shareholders be satisfied with compliance alone, or will they continue to push for additional ESG disclosures? Is this just a “dumb game we woke westerners play,” as Sam Bankman-Fried stated, “where we say all the right shibboleths so everyone likes us,” or is ESG now a permanent focus in the market?
Featuring:
Justin Danhof, Head of Corporate Governance, Strive Asset Management
Hon. Troy Paredes, Founder, Paredes Strategies LLC; Former Commissioner, Unted States Securities and Exchange Commission
Hon. Eugene Scalia, Partner, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher; Former United States Secretary of Labor
Moderator: Hon. Hester Peirce, Commissioner, United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Breakout Sessions
The Challenges for Business in Litigating before an Originalist and Textualist Supreme Court, The U.S. Chamber of Commerce
Lessons Learned from Suing the Federal Government, Cooper & Kirk PLLC
State Data Privacy Laws and Litigation: Recent Developments, Continuing Uncertainties, and Strategies for In-House Counsel, EimerStahl LLP
What In-House Lawyers Need to Know about the Federal Trade Commission’s Current Initiatives, Ranging from a Non-Compete Ban to Merger Enforcement Practices, Eimer Stahl LLP
Consumer Protection Enforcement and Consumer Class Action Developments, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP
How Should Companies Navigate Sub-regulatory Guidance?, Foley & Lardner
Navigating the Currents: State Pro-& Anti- ESG Laws, Foley & Lardner
The Future of Banking and FinTech: Regulatory Issues Surrounding Banks and Digital Financial Services Under the Biden Administration, Jones Day
The Evolving Landscape of U.S. Corporate Criminal Enforcement: What the DOJ’s Recent Policy Changes Mean for You and Your Company, Jones Day
Corporate Crisis Management: A View from the Legal Department, King & Spalding
Confirmed Speakers
Regulatory threats to business are commonly described in terms of rules that impose compliance burdens and costs. Arguably, the federal administrative state does not primarily regulate through rules. Agency investigations of businesses, administrative enforcement, and adjudications that lead to binding orders reflect the primary regulatory activities of the federal administrative state. As the federal courts more readily scrutinize federal rules and the rulemaking process, are regulators even more likely to look at their investigative powers as opportunities for making policy in a way that evades judicial review? Businesses, particularly those whose primary regulatory obligations are federal in nature, prefer regulation via rules because of the clarity and certainty rules provide. When proposed rules may threaten business interests, those companies can get involved in the rulemaking process or petition for new rules. Similar procedures are not available when agencies investigate and bring enforcement actions even though agencies assert that their consent decrees and administrative law orders establish a form of regulatory common law that binds market participants within an industry. In 2019, President Trump sought to address this issue through Executive Order 13,892, “Promoting the Rule of Law Through Transparency and Fairness in Civil Administrative Enforcement and Adjudication.” That order was rescinded on President Biden's first day in office. How should businesses understand the risks of agency investigations versus rulemaking, what does the future look like in agency policymaking, and how can businesses protect their interest in such an environment?
Featuring:
James Burnham, Partner, Jones Day; Former Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Federal Programs and Consumer Protection Branches, United States Department of Justice
Hon. Paul Clement, Partner, Clement & Murphy PLLC; Former United States Solicitor General
David Morrell, Partner, Jones Day; Former Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Federal Programs Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice
Reed D. Rubinstein, Senior Counselor and Director of Oversight and Investigations, America First Legal Foundation
Moderator: Kate Todd, Managing Partner, Ellis George Cipollone O'Brien Annaguey LLP
Sponsored by The U.S. Chamber of Commerce Litigation Center
Featuring:
Hon. Michael Mukasey: Former United States Attorney General