Bond v. United States - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
SCOTUScast 11-08-13 featuring Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz
SCOTUScast 11-08-13 featuring Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz
On November 5, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Bond v. United States. The question in this case is twofold. First, whether the Constitution’s structural limits on federal authority place any constraints on the scope of Congress’ ability to enact legislation to implement a valid treaty, at least in circumstances where the federal law, as applied, goes far beyond the scope of the treaty, intrudes on traditional state prerogatives, and is unnecessary to satisfy the government’s treaty obligations. The second question is whether the provisions of the Chemical Weapons Convention Implementation Act can be interpreted not to reach ordinary poisoning cases, which have been traditionally handled by state and local authorities.
To discuss the case, we have Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz who is the Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center.
[Return to the SCOTUScast menu]
Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center
Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz teaches constitutional law and federal jurisdiction, and he writes articles for the Harvard Law Review and the Stanford Law Review.
He is currently developing a new theory of constitutional interpretation and judicial review. The first installment, entitledThe Subjects of the Constitution, was published in the Stanford Law Review in May of 2010, and it is among the most downloaded articles about constitutional interpretation, judicial review, and/or federal courts in the history of SSRN. The second installment, The Objects of the Constitution, was published in May of 2011, also in the Stanford Law Review. And the comprehensive version is forthcoming as a book by Oxford University Press.
Rosenkranz has served and advised the federal government in a variety of capacities. He clerked for Judge Frank H. Easterbrook on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (1999-2000) and for Justice Anthony M. Kennedy at the U.S. Supreme Court (October Term 2001). He served as an Attorney-Advisor at the Office of Legal Counsel in the U.S. Department of Justice (November 2002 - July 2004). He often testifies before Congress as a constitutional expert—most recently before the House Financial Services Oversight Subcommittee, regarding the Obama Administration's use of bank settlement agreements to circumvent the Appropriations Clause. He has also filed briefs and presented oral argument before the U.S. Supreme Court. His most recent Supreme Court brief, in Los Angeles v. Patel, was cited by Justice Alito in dissent.
Rosenkranz is a member of the New York Bar and the U.S. Supreme Court Bar. He is a Senior Fellow at the Cato Institute. He serves on the Board of Directors of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE). He is a founding member of Heterodox Academy and a member of its Executive Committee. He also serves on the Board of Directors of the Federalist Society and as the faculty advisor to the Georgetown chapter.