Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public policy matters. Any expressions of opinion are those of the author. We welcome responses to the views presented here. To join the debate, please email us at [email protected].
Topics
HHS Proposes Special HIPAA Privacy Rules for “Reproductive Health Care” Information
In accord with the Biden administration’s pro-abortion agenda, the U.S. Department of Health and Human...
Topics
Remembering C. Boyden Gray: 1943 – 2023
We are deeply saddened by the passing of Boyden Gray. He was a wonderful man,...
Topics
A Bug in the Logic: Regulators try to solve the workplace “AI problem” before finding any problem to solve
Earlier this month, the Biden administration published a “request for information” on artificial intelligence in...
Topics
ALI to Vote on No-Injury Medical Monitoring Proposal
The American Law Institute (ALI) will hold its Annual Meeting in Washington, DC on May...
Topics
Implementation of Reagan-Udall’s Recommended Reforms for the Center for Tobacco Products Reforms, A Six Month Status Report
About six months ago, the Reagan-Udall Foundation sent the Food and Drug Administration its Operational...
Topics
FTC v. Facebook: Does the Punishment Fit the Crime?
Industry-wide problems such as data security and privacy require industry-wide solutions. While there is broad...
Topics
How Clear is Clear Enough: A Mix of Textualism, Tribal Sovereignty, and Bankruptcy at the Supreme Court
Indian Tribes are unique entities. They’re sui generis (one of a kind) in American law....
Topics
Chevron Is Dead, Long Live Chevron
The Supreme Court has agreed to revisit Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council (1984), the...
Topics
Answering Threats to Taiwan
Last month, the Federalist Society’s International and National Security Law Practice Group hosted Part II...
Topics
Is a Ban on TikTok a Bill of Attainder?
The White House and a bipartisan group of congressional members have called for measures that...