Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public policy matters. Any expressions of opinion are those of the author. We welcome responses to the views presented here. To join the debate, please email us at [email protected].
Topics
Does United States v. Hansen Reveal the Court’s Reasoning in Groff v. DeJoy?
Today the Court handed down its decision in United States v. Hansen. In so doing,...
Topics
The Supreme Court’s Confused Decision in Haaland v. Brackeen
On June 15, the Supreme Court issued Haaland v. Brackeen. Among other issues, the Court...
Topics
Must the NLRB Follow Rule 56 In Its Summary Judgment Opinions?
In a recent article, published in the Mississippi Law Journal, I argue that the NLRB...
Topics
Crypto King Cites Recent SCOTUS Ruling in Effort to Dismiss Charges
Everyone deserves their day in court. Disgraced former crypto king and FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried...
Topics
Is Glacier Northwest the Tip of the Iceberg?
Nowadays, labor-law cases are a rare sight at the Supreme Court. The Court usually takes...
Topics
The Problem with AI Licensing & an “FDA for Algorithms”
Last year, we released a study for the Federalist Society predicting “The Coming Onslaught of...
Topics
Supreme Court Rules Against EPA’s Claims of Expansive Wetland Authority
On May 25, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Sackett v. EPA, a...
Topics
Double Dribble: The NLRB’s General Counsel revives a debunked legal theory to expand labor law into college athletics
Last week, the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board filed a complaint against...
Topics
ABA and the Federalist Society Host Joint Program on Civility
Deborah Enix-Ross would like to see a national movement promoting civility. She has made civics,...
Topics
Why Three Conservative Justices Enabled California to Regulate a Nationwide Industry
10 a.m. on a Thursday is a bit early to have pork chops on the...