Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public policy matters. Any expressions of opinion are those of the author. We welcome responses to the views presented here. To join the debate, please email us at [email protected].
Topics
Are "Knock-Off Elves" An Emergency?
Judge Steven Seeger of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois...
Topics
Preemption Issues in Broadband Regulation
In an article published last week, The Preemption Predicament Over Broadband Internet Access Services, Lawrence J....
Topics
Salgado v. United States: Will the Supreme Court Require the Department of Justice to Follow the Plain Text of CAFRA’s Attorneys’ Fees Provision?
On April 3rd, the Supreme Court is scheduled to review a crucial petition for a...
Topics
Right to Work Foundation Asks NLRB to Enforce Cannabis Industry Workers’ Rights against State Schemes to Force Them into Union Ranks
Yesterday the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation called on National Labor Relations Board...
Topics
When Missing the Point is the Point: The U.S. Civil Rights Commission Demonstrates Why We Have Recusal Norms
Sometimes, a part of our government goes off-the-rails and pursues policies directly divergent from its...
Topics
Remarks from the 2020 Joseph Story Award
Chair of the 2020 Joseph Story Award, Brendan Anderson “The constitution is the will, the...
Topics
The 2020 Joseph Story Award
The Federalist Society is proud to present the 2020 Joseph Story Award to Professor Stephen...
Topics
Wireless Exceptionalism: Court Concludes T-Mobile/Sprint Merger Will Speed 5G
The New T-Mobile scored a sweeping victory in New York v. Deutsche Telekom AG. A...
Topics
South Dakota Supreme Court Rejects a Version of ABA Model Rule 8.4(g)
On March 9, in a thoughtful letter, the Chief Justice of the South Dakota Supreme...
Topics
South Dakota Rejects Rule 8.4-inspired Effort
Noting that opponents focused on the breadth of the proposed rule and its impact on...