Facts of the Case
The Ethics in Government Act of 1978 created a special court and empowered the Attorney General to recommend to that court the appointment of an "independent counsel" to investigate, and, if necessary, prosecute government officials for certain violations of federal criminal laws.
Questions
Did the Act violate the constitutional principal of separation of powers?
Conclusions
-
The Court addressed a number of constitutional issues in this case and upheld the law. The near-unanimous Court held that the means of selecting the independent counsel did not violate the Appointments Clause; the powers allocated to the special court did not violate Article III; and the Act was not offensive to the separation of powers doctrine since it did not impermissibly interfere with the functions of the Executive Branch.
The End of Independent Agencies? Restoring Presidential Control of the Executive Branch
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
On the day that President Joe Biden took office, among his first official acts was...
The Great Dissent: Justice Scalia's Opinion in Morrison v. Olson
Short video featuring Gary Lawson, Richard Pildes, and Theodore Olson
Thirty years after the decision in Morrison v. Olson, questions raised in Justice Antonin Scalia’s...
Morrison v. Olson Oral Argument Rewind: Everything Old Is New Again
Historian-turned-politician Sen. Ben Sasse (NE) likes a good historical coincidence. And last week, on April...
Towards an Administrative Rule of Lenity: Restoring the Constitutional Congress by Reforming Statutory Interpretation
Federalist Society Review, Volume 19
Note from the Editor: In this article, Joel Nolette proposes an “administrative rule of lenity”...
The CFPB, Justice Scalia, and Lone Dissents
This past Tuesday, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit—in arguably its...
REINING in the Agencies: Oversight of Executive Branch Rulemaking in the 21st Century
Engage Volume 16, Issue 3
Note from the Editor: This article critiques current procedures for agency rulemaking and proposes an...
Conservative & Libertarian Legal Scholarship: Constitutional Law
V. Constitutional Law
[Return to Table of Contents] V. Constitutional Law Note: The Heritage Foundation has published a...
PCAOB Debate
Online Debate
This debate will focus on the following questions: Is the Sarbanes-Oxley Act consistent with the...
Executive Privilege (Continued)
Online Debate
This past June, the House and Senate Judiciary Committees issued five congressional subpoenas directing the...
Executive Privilege
Online Debate
Last month, the House and Senate Judiciary Committees issued five congressional subpoenas directing the production...
Standing on the Shoulders of Scrap: Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Servs., Inc.
Environmental Law & Property Rights Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 3, Issue 3, Winter 2000
In a surprising departure from the trend it set in the 90s of increasing the...
The Independent Counsel Act: An Unconstitutional Delegation of Power of Judges
Federalism & Separation of Powers Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 3, Issue 1, Spring 1999
A defense lawyer for one of the targets of a federal independent counsel probe gave...
Novel Government Lawsuits Against Industries: An Assault on the Rule of Law
Federalism & Separation of Powers Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 3, Issue 1, Spring 1999
Presentation by Bill Pryor, Attorney General of Alabama Tuesday, June 22, 1999, U.S. Chamber of...
ABA Briefs in the 1997-98 Supreme Court Term
Criminal Law & Procedure Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 2, Issue 3, Winter 1998
In the Supreme Court’s 1997-98 term, the American Bar Association continued its past record of...
The Chemical Weapons Treaty is Unconstitutional
International & National Security Law Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 1, Issue 2, Spring 1997
I would like to thank the Chairman for the opportunity to testify on the constitutionality...