Facts of the Case
In 1994 Oregon enacted the Death with Dignity Act, the first state law authorizing physicians to prescribe lethal doses of controlled substances to terminally ill patients. Attorney General John Ashcroft declared in 2001 that physician-assisted suicide violated the Controlled Substances Act of 1970 (CSA). Ashcroft threatened to revoke the medical licenses of physicians who took part in the practice. Oregon sued Ashcroft in federal district court. That court and, later the Ninth Circuit, held Ashcroft''s directive illegal. The courts held that the CSA did not authorize the attorney general to regulate physician-assisted suicide, which was the sort of medical matter historically entrusted to the states.
Questions
Did the Controlled Substances Act authorize the attorney general to ban the use of controlled substances for physician-assisted suicide in Oregon?
Conclusions
-
No. In a 6-3 opinion delivered by Justice Anthony Kennedy, the Court held that Congress intended the CSA to prevent doctors only from engaging in illicit drug dealing, not to define general standards of state medical practice. Moreover, the CSA did not authorize Attorney General John Ashcroft to declare a medical practice authorized under state law to be illegitimate.
The Major Questions Doctrine Is Not About Delegation, but Usurpation—And That Matters
This post was originally published at the Yale Journal on Regulation’s Notice & Comment blog....
Originalism Carries On
Federalist Society Review, Volume 24
A review of Erwin Chemerinsky, A Momentous Year in the Supreme Court: October Term 2021...
What May Be Lurking in the Future of Environmental Law After West Virginia v. EPA
In West Virginia v. EPA, decided in June, the Supreme Court struck down EPA’s attempt...
Yet Another Federal Court Rules Against the CDC Eviction Moratorium
Note: This blog was originally posted at the Volokh Conspiracy. Earlier today, the Judge...
Georgia Supreme Court Strikes Down Ban on Assisted Suicide Advertisements
State Court Docket Watch Spring 2012
In Final Exit Network, Inc. v. Georgia,1 the Georgia Supreme Court unanimously2 concluded that Georgia’s...
