Facts of the Case
The Archbishop of San Antonio sued local zoning authorities for violating his rights under the 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), by denying him a permit to expand his church in Boerne, Texas. Boerne's zoning authorities argued that the Archbishop's church was located in a historic preservation district governed by an ordinance forbidding new construction, and that the RFRA was unconstitutional insofar as it sought to override this local preservation ordinance. On appeal from the Fifth Circuit's reversal of a District Court's finding against Archbishop Flores, the Court granted Boerne's request for certiorari.
Questions
Did Congress exceed its Fourteenth Amendment enforcement powers by enacting the RFRA which, in part, subjected local ordinances to federal regulation?
Conclusions
-
Yes. Under the RFRA, the government is prohibited from "substantially burden[ing]" religion's free exercise unless it must do so to further a compelling government interest, and, even then, it may only impose the least restrictive burden. The Court held that while Congress may enact such legislation as the RFRA, in an attempt to prevent the abuse of religious freedoms, it may not determine the manner in which states enforce the substance of its legislative restrictions. This, the Court added, is precisely what the RFRA does by overly restricting the states' freedom to enforce its spirit in a manner which they deem most appropriate. With respect to this case, specifically, there was no evidence to suggest that Boerne's historic preservation ordinance favored one religion over another, or that it was based on animus or hostility for free religious exercise.
We Are Free for a Reason
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
A review of Free to Believe: The Battle Over Religious Liberty in America, by Luke...
Hate Crimes and the Thirteenth Amendment
Hate crimes are abhorrent to all decent persons. But does Congress have the power to...
Religious Exemptions and Third-Party Harms
Federalist Society Review, Volume 17, Issue 3
Note from the Editor: This article discusses the effect that third-party harms should have on religious...
Stormans v. Wiesman: Paths to Strict Scrutiny in Religious Free Exercise Cases
Federalist Society Review, Volume 17, Issue 2
Note from the Editor: This article is about Stormans v. Wiesman, a case from the 9th...
Religious Liberty after Scalia
Some people opine that Antonin Scalia was not a friend of religious liberty, and that...
Shelby County, Alabama v. Holder: Must Congress Update the Voting Rights Act’s Coverage Formula for Preclearance?
Engage Volume 14, Issue 1 February 2013
Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act requires “covered jurisdictions”—mostly, but not exclusively, in the...
Sleeping Giant?: Section Two of the Thirteenth Amendment, Hate Crimes Legislation, and Academia’s Favorite New Vehicle for the Expansion of Federal Power
Engage Volume 13, Issue 3 October 2012
A brief look at the Thirteenth Amendment might suggest that it has rather limited application...
Testimony on the "Democracy Restoration Act"
Engage Volume 13, Issue 2, July 2012
Note from the Editor: This paper is based on testimony given by the author before...
Florida Constitutional Challenge to Obamacare: It All Comes Down to Broccoli
Engage Volume 12, Issue 3, November 2011
Note from the Editor: This paper provides an update on the litigation dealing with the...
H.R. 3335: “The Democracy Restoration Act”
New Federal Initiatives Project
Brought to you by the Free Speech & Election Law Practice Group Last year, H.R. 3335,...
RLUIPA May not Pass Constitutional Scrutiny
The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (hereafter, “RLUIPA” or the “Act”)...
Intellectual Property Rights and State Sovereign Immunity: The Recent Supreme Court Decisions
Intellectual Property Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 3, Issue 2, Summer 1999
On June 23, 1999, the last day of the most recent Supreme Court Term, the...
Congressional Control Over State Sovereign Immunity: The Recent Supreme Court Decisions
Federalism & Separation of Powers Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 3, Issue 1, Spring 1999
On June 23, 1999, the last day of the most recent Supreme Court Term, the...
State Immunity From Federal Copyright and Trademark Suits: The Chavez Decision
Intellectual Property Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 2, Issue 2, Summer 1998
In April, the Fifth Circuit held in Denise Chavez v. Arte Publico Press, 139 F.3d...
Federalism Revived? The Printz and City of Boerne Decisions
Federalism & Separation of Powers Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 2, Issue 1, Spring 1998
The following program was sponsored by the Federalism and Separation of Powers Practice Group at...
City of Boerne v. Flores: A Victory for Federalism
Federalism & Separation of Powers Practice Group Newsletter - Volume 1, Issue 3, Fall 1997
In deciding whether to invalidate the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) in City of Boerne...
The True Extent of Executive Power
Duke Student Chapter
Zoom Webinar -- Duke210 Science Drive
Durham, NC 27708
The True Extent of Executive Power
Texas Student Chapter
Zoom Webinar -- University of Texashttps://us02web.zoom.us/j/87136050075
Austin, TX 78705
Debate: The True Extent of Executive Power
Columbia Student Chapter
Zoom Webinar -- Columbia Law SchoolZoom
New York, NY 10027